Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A320 Nose Gear Retraction  
User currently offlineMeister808 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 973 posts, RR: 1
Posted (7 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 6080 times:

Ok folks, I guarantee this has been discussed before, but I can't find it - does the A320 family nosewheel turn 90° on retraction into the nose wheel well, or does it go straight forward? I can't seem to find anything that would suggest that it turns, but the topic came up in discussion and there's more than a few people I know that insist such a design was the reason for the well-publicized Jetblue incident at LAX last year.

Am I missing something?

-Meister

[Edited 2007-04-24 23:19:05]


Twin Cessna 812 Victor, Minneapolis Center, we observe your operation in the immediate vicinity of extreme precipitation
29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineB78710 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 340 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 6077 times:

most nose gear have whats called a centering cam which ensures the nose gear is straight before retraction, if it isn't it will not retract! the gear probably wouldnt even fit into the bay if it was at 90 degree's.....but dont quite me on that!

wasn't the jet blue incident something to do with some kind of nose wheel steering failure causeing it to go full one way?


User currently offlineTristarSteve From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 3976 posts, RR: 34
Reply 2, posted (7 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 6078 times:

Well wrong twice.
It doesn't turn 90deg, and it goes straight forward, not back.

The only gear I know that turns 90deg is the HS Trident MLG. This MLG had 4 wheels on a single axle, and rotated 90 deg on retraction to fit into the wing.


User currently offlineMeister808 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 973 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (7 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 6067 times:

Thanks - fixed the forward/back thing, brain fart on my part

Good to know I wasn't crazy.

-Meister



Twin Cessna 812 Victor, Minneapolis Center, we observe your operation in the immediate vicinity of extreme precipitation
User currently onlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24801 posts, RR: 22
Reply 4, posted (7 years 3 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6020 times:

Quoting TristarSteve (Reply 2):
The only gear I know that turns 90deg is the HS Trident MLG. This MLG had 4 wheels on a single axle, and rotated 90 deg on retraction to fit into the wing.

That wasn't the Trident's only unusual landing gear feature. It also had the strange off-center nosegear that retracted sideways. As I recall that was to facilitate the location of the Trident's then state-of-the-art autoland equipment.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ray Pettit
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Petch



User currently offlineRwy04LGA From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 3176 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (7 years 3 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 6006 times:

The USAF XB-70 MLG also rotated 90 degrees before retracting rearward.


Check THIS out! http://www5a.biglobe.ne.jp/~t_miyama/b70leg01.html



Just accept that some days, you're the pigeon, and other days the statue
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31667 posts, RR: 56
Reply 6, posted (7 years 3 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5965 times:

The centering cams will locate the NLG wheel in a Straight line along the Longitutional axis when the strut extends.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineTristarSteve From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 3976 posts, RR: 34
Reply 7, posted (7 years 3 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 5952 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 4):
It also had the strange off-center nosegear that retracted sideways. As I recall that was to facilitate the location of the Trident's then state-of-the-art autoland equipment.

There was a myth around that the NLG retracted sideways so that the nose wheels did not hit the centre line landing lights when doing Cat 3 autoland.


User currently offlinePGNCS From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 2820 posts, RR: 45
Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 5815 times:

It centers. In my A-320 AOM under the topic of Brake and Steering Control Unit (BSCU) it says "An internal cam mechanism returns the nose wheel to the centered position after take-off."

Hope this helps!


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21510 posts, RR: 55
Reply 9, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 5768 times:

Don't the main gear of the Tu-144 do some kind of funky retraction?

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31667 posts, RR: 56
Reply 10, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5767 times:

Quoting Mir (Reply 9):
Don't the main gear of the Tu-144 do some kind of funky retraction?



Watch the Bounce.

regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineTristarSteve From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 3976 posts, RR: 34
Reply 11, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 5749 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 4):
That wasn't the Trident's only unusual landing gear feature

Also the Trident mainwheels were single wheels with two tyres on each wheel. I remember the trouble we had getting them off. They seemed to be an interference fit over the brakes, and more than once we had to remove the whole wheel/brake assy because the wheel would not come off!

Also strange was the emergency lowering of the gear. This used a compressed air bottle which blew high pressure air into the normal retraction jacks. You then had to use a turner adaptor to let the pressure out on the ground.

There was a lot of engineering on the Trident.


User currently offlineMemphis From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 143 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 5367 times:

hey, isn't that the airwolf soundtrack???


nocturnal
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21510 posts, RR: 55
Reply 13, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 5299 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 4):
It also had the strange off-center nosegear that retracted sideways. As I recall that was to facilitate the location of the Trident's then state-of-the-art autoland equipment.

I heard it was because the autoland system was too good, and was putting the nose gear down right on the runway lights, which created a lot of vibration, so they chose of offset it.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16991 posts, RR: 67
Reply 14, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 5273 times:

Quoting Memphis (Reply 12):
hey, isn't that the airwolf soundtrack???

Hehe. Certainly is.

Man that was loud inside!



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineBAW2198 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 637 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 5207 times:

Quoting Meister808 (Thread starter):
does the A320 family nosewheel turn 90° on retraction into the nose wheel well,

some aircraft that do are

The Beechcraft Sierra the nose wheel turns 90 and then retracts backward and the Piper Malibu (the older ones without the gear doors) which retracts in the same manner as the Sierra.



"And remember, Keep your stick on the ice"--->Red Green
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31667 posts, RR: 56
Reply 16, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 5153 times:

Quoting BAW2198 (Reply 15):
some aircraft that do are

I don't think the A320 Nose Wheel turns 90deg on before retraction.The centering cam ensures its Straight.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineDH106 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 626 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 5142 times:

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 16):
I don't think the A320 Nose Wheel turns 90deg on before retraction.The centering cam ensures its Straight.

Exactly - what would be the point?
Twin wheels are pretty much as wide as long so no real space saving.
Usually when they turn on retraction it's so a single wheel can lie flat and save space.



...I watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tanhauser Gate....
User currently offlineBAW2198 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 637 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 5104 times:

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 16):
I don't think the A320 Nose Wheel turns 90deg on before retraction.The centering cam ensures its Straight.
regds

HAWK, I wasn't saying that the 320 did. Everybody above already answered that, I was just giving examples of planes that did use that retraction method.



"And remember, Keep your stick on the ice"--->Red Green
User currently offlineMoo From Falkland Islands, joined May 2007, 3865 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 5069 times:

Quoting Meister808 (Thread starter):
Ok folks, I guarantee this has been discussed before, but I can't find it - does the A320 family nosewheel turn 90° on retraction into the nose wheel well, or does it go straight forward? I can't seem to find anything that would suggest that it turns, but the topic came up in discussion and there's more than a few people I know that insist such a design was the reason for the well-publicized Jetblue incident at LAX last year.



Quoting B78710 (Reply 1):
wasn't the jet blue incident something to do with some kind of nose wheel steering failure causeing it to go full one way?

There was a very good reason for the Jet Blue incident last year, and infact the actions of the nose gear on that occasion was by design.

When the A320 series leaves the ground, a mechanical cam system centres the gear (as Hawk21M said). If this mechanism fails, the gear system does not infact know where the wheel is pointing with any certainty.

In order to provide for a safe landing in this case, the gear is rotated until it locks at the 90 degree point - its safer to land in this way and destroy the front gear and strut than it is to land with the gear facing an unknown direction with the potential for an uncontrolled forward motion off the central axis at speed.

Thats the reason for the 90 degree rotation.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31667 posts, RR: 56
Reply 20, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 4973 times:

Quoting BAW2198 (Reply 18):
I was just giving examples of planes that did use that retraction method.

My Apoligies.Guess I read the sentence Differently.

regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offline320tech From Turks and Caicos Islands, joined May 2004, 491 posts, RR: 5
Reply 21, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4944 times:

Quoting Moo (Reply 19):
There was a very good reason for the Jet Blue incident last year, and infact the actions of the nose gear on that occasion was by design.

When the A320 series leaves the ground, a mechanical cam system centres the gear (as Hawk21M said). If this mechanism fails, the gear system does not infact know where the wheel is pointing with any certainty.

In order to provide for a safe landing in this case, the gear is rotated until it locks at the 90 degree point - its safer to land in this way and destroy the front gear and strut than it is to land with the gear facing an unknown direction with the potential for an uncontrolled forward motion off the central axis at speed.

Thats the reason for the 90 degree rotation.

As far as I can tell, this isn't true. This incident had nothing to do with a failure in the centring cam, and there's hardly anything in there to fail, anyway.

It was actually a failure in the nosewheel steering system. An oring failed, causing hydraulic pressure to turn the wheels over to the mechanical stop, which is at the (approx, I forget) 86 degree position. This has happened several times.

You can read the article on Jet Blue flight 292. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JetBlue_Airways_Flight_292



The primary function of the design engineer is to make things difficult for the manufacturer and impossible for the AME.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16991 posts, RR: 67
Reply 22, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4916 times:

Quoting 320tech (Reply 21):

As far as I can tell, this isn't true. This incident had nothing to do with a failure in the centring cam, and there's hardly anything in there to fail, anyway.

It was actually a failure in the nosewheel steering system. An oring failed, causing hydraulic pressure to turn the wheels over to the mechanical stop, which is at the (approx, I forget) 86 degree position. This has happened several times.

If we ignore for a second the cause, didn't the gear go to the mechanical stop at about 90 degrees? That would seem to be the objective right?



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offline320tech From Turks and Caicos Islands, joined May 2004, 491 posts, RR: 5
Reply 23, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 4892 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 22):
If we ignore for a second the cause, didn't the gear go to the mechanical stop at about 90 degrees? That would seem to be the objective right?

Well, my point is that having the gear rotate isn't a design feature, it's just the way it happens in that particular failure. I think the A320 is a well-designed airplane, but let's not give Airbus more credit than they deserve.  Smile



The primary function of the design engineer is to make things difficult for the manufacturer and impossible for the AME.
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31667 posts, RR: 56
Reply 24, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4861 times:

Quoting 320tech (Reply 21):
It was actually a failure in the nosewheel steering system. An oring failed, causing hydraulic pressure to turn the wheels over to the mechanical stop, which is at the (approx, I forget) 86 degree position. This has happened several times

What was the ADs Instructions like.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
25 Post contains links Troubleshooter : FAA AD 99-23-09 This is the only one I could find in a minute...
26 Starlionblue : From what I have heard it is in fact a design feature. I may be wrong of course.
27 320tech : I may be wrong, too. I'll see what I can find next time I'm at work.
28 HAWK21M : requires modification of the electro-distributor for the nose wheel steering servo-control Thanks. regds MEL
29 David L : I seem to recall from previous discussions that it was considered safer to land with the nose gear stuck 90o off-centre, producing no tendency to vee
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic A320 Nose Gear Retraction
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
A320 Nose Gear Brakes? posted Mon Sep 5 2005 15:49:10 by LongHauler
Creaking Sounds On 747-400 Nose Gear posted Sat Mar 24 2007 17:58:59 by 744lover
Question About MD-11 Nose Gear. posted Wed Feb 14 2007 05:10:43 by Gunsontheroof
A320 Nose Wheel Steering Faults... posted Sun Nov 19 2006 23:04:52 by Kaddyuk
Nose Gear Spray Deflector posted Fri Sep 22 2006 19:16:36 by Ferret
Object On Back Of MD-80 Nose Gear posted Fri Aug 4 2006 22:21:00 by WHPBUR
What If The Nose Gear Collapsed On Takeoff? posted Sat May 20 2006 11:31:42 by F.pier
Are There Brakes On The Nose Gear? posted Tue Jan 24 2006 02:16:47 by Airfoilsguy
Beech 1900: Nose Gear Collapse But Save Props? posted Fri Dec 30 2005 20:01:14 by Eksath
Tupolev Gear Retraction Sequence posted Tue Dec 6 2005 03:39:18 by Ptrjong

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format