Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
380 Engine...Running On One Engine Or Problems  
User currently offlineRelic From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 114 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 4 months 2 hours ago) and read 4168 times:

Hi everyone
This was taken a few days ago near toulouse.Do you think she is running on one engine or is there a problem.
Cheers
Andy

Big version: Width: 780 Height: 1024 File size: 356kb
Hi everyone,This was taken near Toulouse a few days ago.Is she flying on one engine,or do you think she has a problem.Cheers Andy


20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLH526 From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 2356 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (7 years 4 months 1 hour ago) and read 4139 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

This ain't a contrail, those begin much farther away from the engine, the case that the gear is lowered also makes me suspect that it's a fuel dump. I have no Idea where the fuel-dump valve is located on the A380, but right over the engine outlet is a rather odd place.

Mario
LH526



Trittst im Morgenrot daher, seh ich dich im Strahlenmeer ...
User currently offlineRelic From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 114 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4096 times:

I must admit Mario i thought it might be a fuel dump,and it probably is,but what a place to put the valve.lol.

User currently offlineANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3302 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 4056 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Why would she dump over land, as well? This seems to be quite bizarre to me, but then again, I don't know much, haha.

You may want to throw this thread over to Tech/Ops.

TIS



www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 4, posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 4045 times:

they're just testing the dispersal system for chemtrails...
Probably testing the nozzels one at a time to make sure they all work before trying the entire system as one.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineLnglive1011yyz From Canada, joined Oct 2003, 1608 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3969 times:

Quoting ANITIX87 (Reply 3):
Why would she dump over land, as well? This seems to be quite bizarre to me, but then again, I don't know much, haha

Judging by the altitude that this plane appears to be flying (probably over 5,000 ft).. by the time the fuel would reach the ground, it would have dispersed into vapour.

Looks to me like a simple test of something..

Perhaps someone working @ Airbus can elaborate?

1011yyz



Pack your bags, we're going on a sympathy trip!
User currently offlineStevenL From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3911 times:

I could have sworn that was a 747-400, but then after a closer look, it is an Airbus.

But honestly it looks like a 747....


User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 7, posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3890 times:

Quoting ANITIX87 (Reply 3):
Why would she dump over land, as well?

Standard practice as long as you're high enough.



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineAgill From Sweden, joined Feb 2004, 1010 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 3772 times:

Quoting Jwenting (Reply 4):
they're just testing the dispersal system for chemtrails...

Haha if you look carefully you can see the stonemason logo.


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 9, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3705 times:

Quoting StevenL (Reply 6):
But honestly it looks like a 747....

It doesn't. The wing is too broad and a bit too far forward to be a 747.
Fuselage seems too wide as well.
Landing gear is down and gear configuration is quite different from a 747.

Quoting Agill (Reply 8):
Haha if you look carefully you can see the stonemason logo.

Shhh, now We'll have to send Our Black Helicopters after you.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineBoeingFixer From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 530 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3589 times:

Quoting Relic (Thread starter):
Hi everyone
This was taken a few days ago near toulouse.Do you think she is running on one engine or is there a problem.
Cheers
Andy

Why start a second thread on exactly the same photo/subject?

380 Engine.Is This A Fuel Dump Or Another Test (by Relic Apr 25 2007 in Tech Ops)

Personally I feel it's just an engine problem. Looks too much like burning engine oil. No too difficult to imagine with a new engine type. Could be a labyrinth seal, bearing scavenge pump, oil line seal, partially plugged breather, etc......

One thing it's not is a fuel dump. The dump nozzle is located in the second from outboard flap track canoe fairing (you would never get certification for a dump nozzle located directly behind an engine).... http://flickr.com/photos/19138132@N00/437592838/ I highly doubt it's a smoke generator for a flight test as they would generally have done this in the flight test area and not close to the airport on final approach in landing configuration. The smoke does look like it's below the flap tip and in the engine exhaust gas path. If it was a test to check flap tip vortices, the smoke would be more defined.

Cheers,

John



Cheers, John YYC
User currently offlineN215AZ From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 77 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 3561 times:

Quoting BoeingFixer (Reply 10):

While most of that was Greek to me, I would have to agree. I cant imagine them running the plane on one engine, but weirder things have happened. An oil burn makes the most sense of all the other suggestions here.

N215AZ



"Atra esterní ono thelduin, Mor'ranr lífa unin hjarta onr, Un du evarínya ono varda."
User currently offlineFerroviarius From Norway, joined Mar 2007, 225 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 3528 times:

Good evening.

Aren't the landing gears lowered? Wouldn't this indicate that the plane is not so high in the air?
Could it hence be that the Contrail - if it is one - we see is generated by a plane high in the air and hidden to our eyes by the wing?

Just a suggestion.

Best,

Ferroviarius


User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17015 posts, RR: 67
Reply 13, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3492 times:

Quoting Ferroviarius (Reply 12):
Aren't the landing gears lowered? Wouldn't this indicate that the plane is not so high in the air?
Could it hence be that the Contrail - if it is one - we see is generated by a plane high in the air and hidden to our eyes by the wing?

In testing, they may have the gear down at higher than normal altitude.

Contrails are normally generated at higher altitudes but in some conditions they can be generated at any altitude.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineBoeingFixer From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 530 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3470 times:

Quoting Ferroviarius (Reply 12):
Could it hence be that the Contrail - if it is one - we see is generated by a plane high in the air and hidden to our eyes by the wing?



Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 13):
Contrails are normally generated at higher altitudes but in some conditions they can be generated at any altitude.

I think Ferroviarius was trying to say it could be a contrail from a higher flying aircraft that is hidden from view by the A380 wing.

I still go by my theory in reply 10 as a contrail ot high altitude wouldn't difuse as quickly as this one does.

Cheers,

John



Cheers, John YYC
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17015 posts, RR: 67
Reply 15, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3428 times:

Quoting BoeingFixer (Reply 14):
I think Ferroviarius was trying to say it could be a contrail from a higher flying aircraft that is hidden from view by the A380 wing.

Ooooooh.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineFrancoflier From France, joined Oct 2001, 3741 posts, RR: 11
Reply 16, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3289 times:

I'll definitely agree with BoeingFixer. From the blueish color of that thing, it's gotta be oil...

I haven't heard anything concerning engine problems or inflight shutdowns during certification (BTW are those the EA or RR?), but then I doubt we'd hear anything about it anyway. When flying with uncertified engines, that's the kind of thing you can expect, especially considering those engines take a serious beating during proving flights.



Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit posting...
User currently offlineBoeingFixer From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 530 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3281 times:

Quoting Francoflier (Reply 16):
(BTW are those the EA or RR?),

Looks like the RR nacelles to me.

Cheers,

John



Cheers, John YYC
User currently offlineOvercast From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 160 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3272 times:

I think this photo gives us the answer, for the smoke/contrail.

http://www.planepictures.net/netshow.php?id=615197

What they are using this to test is another question.


User currently offlineRelic From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 114 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3272 times:

Quoting BoeingFixer (Reply 10):

Hi
just replying to this quote.
This thread was initially in the photography forum.ANET removed it and put it in here after i had already started a new thread in tech/ops.Hence two threads on the same topic


User currently offlineBoeingFixer From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 530 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3222 times:

Quoting Overcast (Reply 18):
I think this photo gives us the answer, for the smoke/contrail.

http://www.planepictures.net/netshow.php?id=615197

What they are using this to test is another question.

First I've ever heard of a smoke producer being placed in the engine exhaust cone. Looks more like the first start of a new engine burning out the inhibiting oil or they could be trying to find out the malfunction that produced the original in-flight picture.

Cheers,

John



Cheers, John YYC
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic 380 Engine...Running On One Engine Or Problems
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Can A 777/767/757 Fly Only On One Engine? posted Wed Mar 1 2006 07:43:52 by Swank300
Operating On One Engine?! posted Sun Jun 6 2004 10:45:49 by Soaringadi
T/O On One Engine? posted Fri Dec 12 2003 09:36:15 by Cricri
Can A 747 Survive On One Engine? posted Mon Sep 22 2003 04:33:24 by Tarzanboy
Can They Fly On One Outboard Engine? posted Fri Mar 7 2003 08:36:36 by Mhsieh
Flying On One Engine posted Thu Aug 30 2001 12:04:42 by EFG
Can A Twin Jet Go Around On One Engine? posted Wed Aug 29 2001 12:34:42 by STEINWAY
"On Final" Or "On Finals"? posted Sat Feb 3 2007 01:09:05 by Evan767
Brake Failure On One Side - Know Before? posted Mon Jun 26 2006 21:24:59 by Julianuk
A Car Running On 100LL posted Wed Sep 7 2005 05:21:34 by FLY2HMO

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format