Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Accuracy Of Older Planes Avionics/gauges  
User currently offlineTheSonntag From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 3579 posts, RR: 29
Posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1886 times:

A lot of old DC-3 airplanes are still flying around, as are old Ju-52s and other old planes.

This leads to my question: How precise were old gauges compared to new ones. For example, were altitude and speed gauges in the 1940s as precise as newer ones which were installed in the 1960s and today?

Certainly modern planes have more capabilities than the older ones, but what about the instruments themselves, how good are the old ones?

Michael

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFredT From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2002, 2185 posts, RR: 26
Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1845 times:

As with everything else, there are variations in quality in aircraft instruments. You can buy cheap ones with less precision and you can buy expensive ones with more precision. Technology advances, meaning instruments get cheaper for the same precision or more precise at the same cost. Instruments age and wear, and as they do they become less precise.

Was that the answer to your question?

If you want to quantify this, you have to specify which instruments you want to compare. The instruments in a state-of-the-art 1930's airliner differed a lot from the instruments in a 1930's surplus WWI warbird barnstormer. I frankly would not bother looking it up, even if I had any idea about where to find the data, as the exact figures won't really do much to further the progress of mankind.

For an example of how to measure instrument performance, I suggest googling at the requirements for RVSM certification.

Cheers,
/Fred



I thought I was doing good trying to avoid those airport hotels... and look at me now.
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1843 times:

Accurate enough for the speed and performance in question. A Fokker trimotor can just barely turn fast enough to keep up with gyroscopic precession.  

Seriously, if reliability is not in question, the accuracy of these gauges will permit you to hand-fly ILS approaches to 200' and a half mile any old rainy night.

ADF approaches were fun, in a Revolutionary War re-enacting sort of way. Like blacksmithing or flint-knapping, it is cool to master a skill of another time.

edit: Kay for tea

[Edited 2007-08-30 20:30:17]


Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineJetlagged From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 2556 posts, RR: 24
Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1790 times:

Quoting TheSonntag (Thread starter):
A lot of old DC-3 airplanes are still flying around, as are old Ju-52s and other old planes.

This leads to my question: How precise were old gauges compared to new ones. For example, were altitude and speed gauges in the 1940s as precise as newer ones which were installed in the 1960s and today?

If you are comparing pitot-static gauges, then there is no reason why not, because the technology involved is exactly the same. Since the 1960's, Air Data Computers have allowed correction for position errors, etc. EFIS has removed the instrument errors, but ultimately the altitude and airspeed displays still rely on the same pitot-static sources. It's only comparatively recently that accuracy has been increased significantly to cater for RVSM, etc.

I should imagine that the design and construction standards of original Ju-52 gauges would be hard to beat even today.



The glass isn't half empty, or half full, it's twice as big as it needs to be.
User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6381 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1786 times:

Quoting SlamClick (Reply 2):
ADF approaches were fun, in a Revolutionary War re-enacting sort of way. Like blacksmithing or flint-knapping, it is cool to master a skill of another time.

How about following a course on an old four-course radio range?  eyebrow 

Okay, back to my Ernie Gann books...  Wink



Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1765 times:

Quoting KELPkid (Reply 4):
How about following a course on an old four-course radio range?

Never flew one of them but I did mess around with a similar technology.
Adcock range used the morse code A or N (.- or -.) for orientation.
The Army used FM homers that converted a signal received by dipole antennas to a D or a U (-.. or ..-) They overlap in precisely the same manner as A and N. So the memory gouge to stay on the beam was either "step on the dash" or "U-turn right"



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineSaintsman From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2002, 2065 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

Not exactly ancient but still old, the compass system on the VC-10 was (is) set up to an accuracy of 0.2 of a degree. That was more accurate than the pilots can read on their instruments.

Items such as altimeters were set up in the workshop bays using manometers and correction tables issued. The limits were pretty strict.

People think that just because things are modern they must be better. For example digital radios. In order for them to be digital they clip the top of the frequencies to make a square wave. A high end analogue radio will therefore produce a better sound because you get all of the frequency. Modern probably means more reliable though.


User currently offlineJetlagged From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 2556 posts, RR: 24
Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1710 times:

Quoting Saintsman (Reply 6):
For example digital radios. In order for them to be digital they clip the top of the frequencies to make a square wave. A high end analogue radio will therefore produce a better sound because you get all of the frequency.

Digital radio means that amplitude information is sent in digital form, analogous to a CD. Nothing to do with clipping waveforms. Fidelity is preserved as long as the bit rate is high enough.

On the modern versus less modern theme, most people listen to music on MP3 download these days without realising this is a significant loss of quality compared to CD. You pay the same amount for poorer quality, assuming legal downloads of course.  Confused



The glass isn't half empty, or half full, it's twice as big as it needs to be.
User currently offlineSprout5199 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1853 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1703 times:

Quoting Saintsman (Reply 6):
For example digital radios. In order for them to be digital they clip the top of the frequencies to make a square wave. A high end analogue radio will therefore produce a better sound because you get all of the frequency.

Actually, what you describe is sort of what happens in a FM radio. You can amplify a FM signal many times without losing any of the quality, but with AM when you amplify it you also amplify all the noise with it I.E. lighting stikes and such. The digital radios that I work on are a 4 level modulation using a IMBE Vocoder(APCO project 25). when looking at it with a Oscope, it sort of looks like a sine wave depending of the what tone you using to modulate it.

Dan in Jupiter


User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17038 posts, RR: 66
Reply 9, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1689 times:

I am currently reading the Hornblower books by Forester. Interesting to see how navigation was carried out in the Age of Sail. Chronometers, sextants, soundings, logs (the original wooden kind), estimates of currents. Even counting of oar strokes in the fog. It amazes me the kind of precision they actually managed given the technology. It required a lot of the navigators to get it just right.

Quoting Jetlagged (Reply 3):
I should imagine that the design and construction standards of original Ju-52 gauges would be hard to beat even today.

Those Germans always know what they are doing.

Quoting Saintsman (Reply 6):
Modern probably means more reliable though.

Don't forget smaller and cheaper, probably the two main advantages of modern electronics.

Quoting Jetlagged (Reply 7):
On the modern versus less modern theme, most people listen to music on MP3 download these days without realising this is a significant loss of quality compared to CD. You pay the same amount for poorer quality, assuming legal downloads of course.

You're assuming ripping at a lower bitrate. Digital rips do not inherently have lower quality than a CD. While MP3 always has some compression (and thus some loss), it is possible to record at full bitrate (320kbps if memory serves) and get pretty much CD quality. Or you can just use AAC or some similar lossless format.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineJetlagged From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 2556 posts, RR: 24
Reply 10, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1647 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 9):
You're assuming ripping at a lower bitrate.

Well I was only thinking about the extra compression, comparing a download to a CD, rather than a ripped MP3 to the original CD. However I see your point, because my experience of reduced MP3 quality is from ripped CDs, rather than downloads (my son's area of expertise).

[Get's coat, sees self out]



The glass isn't half empty, or half full, it's twice as big as it needs to be.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17038 posts, RR: 66
Reply 11, posted (7 years 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1571 times:

Quoting Jetlagged (Reply 10):
Well I was only thinking about the extra compression, comparing a download to a CD, rather than a ripped MP3 to the original CD. However I see your point, because my experience of reduced MP3 quality is from ripped CDs, rather than downloads (my son's area of expertise).

Well, you and I know about loss. Most people don't. Most people use a lower bitrate for MP3 ripping. If nothing else, programs like Windows Media Player rip at a lower bit rate by default (192kbps if memory serves).



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Accuracy Of Older Planes Avionics/gauges
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Engines On Older Planes posted Tue Apr 25 2006 22:33:09 by JayinKitsap
Tech Question - Older Planes posted Tue May 25 2004 08:04:08 by Videns
Small Planes: Why Land Left Of The Centerline? posted Tue Jan 9 2007 22:59:38 by ManuCH
Thinking Of Going To Schoool For Avionics posted Tue Aug 24 2004 03:28:11 by Aviationhack
Your Way Of Avoiding Airsickness In Small Planes posted Fri Dec 28 2001 03:21:35 by Sushka
Landing (Stopping) Distance Of Small Aircraft posted Tue Aug 28 2007 21:56:15 by Flexo
Lights On Planes...? posted Mon Aug 27 2007 22:17:03 by Pizzaandplanes
FAA Emergency AD Of 737's posted Mon Aug 27 2007 17:44:38 by Readytotaxi
A Tri Jet The Size Of The A380? posted Sun Aug 26 2007 08:22:29 by NEMA
Lower Flap Speeds On Older Aircraft posted Sun Aug 26 2007 01:33:11 by Blackbird

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format