Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
J-52 / JT8D / Swedish RM-8 Turbofan: Spool-up Time  
User currently offlineBlackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3577 times:

Okay... the JT8D's spool up time is around 6.5 to 8 seconds. What was the original J-52's spool-up rate? -- It seemed as if the A-6 intruders spooled up faster than that?

Also the RM-8, was it modified at all from the baseline JT8D design? Was it's spool-up rate different? Was it designed to fly faster?

(Assuming none of this is classified -- I doubt it would be since the A-6 is an outdated aircraft -- that is)


I'm not asking this question on the military forum because the JT8D was used for both civilian and military uses and I figure should be under tech-ops which is not military (or even civilian) specific.


Andrea Kent

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 43
Reply 1, posted (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3550 times:



Quoting Blackbird (Thread starter):
Also the RM-8, was it modified at all from the baseline JT8D design?

The Volvo Flygmotor RM-8A or B(as was used in the Saab Viggen) was a standard JT8D but modified internally and an after burner was added.
It also features a different reverser.

Can't help you with the other questions.



The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineJetlagged From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 2532 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3519 times:



Quoting Blackbird (Thread starter):
Okay... the JT8D's spool up time is around 6.5 to 8 seconds. What was the original J-52's spool-up rate? -- It seemed as if the A-6 intruders spooled up faster than that?

Also the RM-8, was it modified at all from the baseline JT8D design? Was it's spool-up rate different? Was it designed to fly faster?

The J52 was a turbojet, with one less compressor stage than a JT8D or an RM8. It might well have different dynamics. Also a civilian engine might be set up with a wider surge margin, and hence have its ACU set to spool up more slowly. A military variant could be allowed less surge margin and so accelerate faster. Whether the ACU was different I don't know.

The Volvo RM8B was certainly different to the JT8D as it apparently had three fan stages. The last question is rather obvious as clearly both the RM8A and RM8B were designed for a supersonic application.



The glass isn't half empty, or half full, it's twice as big as it needs to be.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16908 posts, RR: 67
Reply 3, posted (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3489 times:



Quoting Blackbird (Thread starter):

Also the RM-8, was it modified at all from the baseline JT8D design? Was it's spool-up rate different? Was it designed to fly faster?

"fly faster" is a bit of a misnomer. Even in supersonic flight, intake speed is slowed to subsonic. And that's as much as I know on the subject.

Quoting Blackbird (Thread starter):
(Assuming none of this is classified -- I doubt it would be since the A-6 is an outdated aircraft -- that is)

Yes and no. There are privately owned aircraft (museum pieces mostly) out there from the A-6 era that are not allowed to be made airworthy because they are too advanced. I'm sure there are plenty of third and fourth rate air forces that would (literally) kill to get a bunch of A-6s in service. And just because it's outdated doesn't make it totally ineffective against a first rate air power. Even in a best case scenario (from the first rate side) it would tie up resources.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineBlackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3464 times:

Dear Jetlagged,

What's an ACU?

Regarding the design being used for supersonic operation? Does that mean like more air-cooling or something?


Andrea Kent


User currently offlineJetlagged From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 2532 posts, RR: 24
Reply 5, posted (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3438 times:

ACU = Acceleration Control Unit. Part of the engine fuel control unit which limits fuel flow, so limiting engine acceleration to prevent surges.

Supersonic mods are mainly in the intake and exhaust nozzle area. The intake is designed to compress the air using shock waves and variable ramps and so reduce air velocity to subsonic. The additional air pressure is a useful bonus. The exhaust nozzle is variable area so the air can be expanded supersonically when necessary.



The glass isn't half empty, or half full, it's twice as big as it needs to be.
User currently offlineAirgypsy From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 130 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3411 times:

ACU = Compressor Bleed Control for JT8s. The range of JT8s makes any general statement impossible. Straight 8s (1-17R) and the -200 series. The -17s bore almost no resemblance to the very popular early -7s. -200s came with a real fan and very advanced compressor control. Acceleration times are very dependant on the type and number of the bleed valves and the controller set up. I always gave a DC-9/MD-80 plenty of time to make up its mind when maintenance taxiing because unless you did a lot of checking first, you never knew what to expect when you pushed up the throttles.
6th stage, 8th stage, 13th stage bleed valve numbers changed with every effort to eliminate the chuffing and banging that was brought on by the EPA requirements to burn cleaner (particulate emissions). Unlike the GE compressor articulated stator vanes that provided a smooth transition from idle to power, the 8s shifted like a drag racer dropping the hammer when the bleed vaves closed (provided they didn't stick). Then there are the fuel control 3D cam issues with the 8s.
Besides - read closely and you'll find that acceleration limits are manufacturers "recommendations".
Military engines (like the Spey) are also saddled with governors and limiters that allow the operator to move the throttle without regard to overspeed or overtemp.
You will still be discussing this next Christmass. Happy new year.


User currently offlineJetlagged From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 2532 posts, RR: 24
Reply 7, posted (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3399 times:



Quoting Airgypsy (Reply 6):
ACU = Compressor Bleed Control for JT8s

I was talking about the ACU within the fuel control unit, not surge bleed valves. Bleed valves certainly affect engine acceleration, but fuel control gives a more precise effect.

Quoting Airgypsy (Reply 6):
Military engines (like the Spey) are also saddled with governors and limiters that allow the operator to move the throttle without regard to overspeed or overtemp.

Not just a military thing. Rolls Royce typically added many more governors than were usual on a Pratt & Whitney engine of that era. That included civil Speys, Conways, RB211s.



The glass isn't half empty, or half full, it's twice as big as it needs to be.
User currently offlineBlackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3360 times:

Since the RM-8 was designed for high-speed flight in excess of Mach 2, conditions which would drive up the airplane's turbine inlet temperature, did it feature a modified turbine?

How quick were the RR-Ghost, RR-Avon, and RR-Spey spool-up rates if any of you guys know any of them by the way?


Starlionblue,

Quote:
There are privately owned aircraft (museum pieces mostly) out there from the A-6 era that are not allowed to be made airworthy because they are too advanced.

Like a B-58 or something?


User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3348 times:



Quoting Airgypsy (Reply 6):
The -17s bore almost no resemblance to the very popular early -7s. -200s came with a real fan and very advanced compressor control.

What exactly do you mean by "Real Fan?" Are you saying the str8 8s were basically turbojets (in a sense)


User currently offlineBlackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3344 times:

So, even some older military turbojets in addition to having a fuel-control system designed with a narrower surge margin, and possibly more liberal use of bleed valves to allow faster spool-up, also were designed with governors and limiters to allow the pilot to achieve maximum performance out of the engine safely?


BR715-A1-30,

I would guess that he meant that the plane had a fan of more pronounced size than the earlier JT8D's, and a more substantial bypass-ratio.


Andrea Kent


User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16908 posts, RR: 67
Reply 11, posted (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 3331 times:



Quoting Blackbird (Reply 8):
Quote:
There are privately owned aircraft (museum pieces mostly) out there from the A-6 era that are not allowed to be made airworthy because they are too advanced.

Like a B-58 or something?

Some F-4s. Ok those are a bit younger but not much.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineAirgypsy From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 130 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3320 times:

Straight 8s are "low" bypass engines. -200s are "medium" bypass engines. JT9s are "high" bypass. A J-75 turbojet is a no bypass.
Otherwise referred to as LRT = Little Round Things and BRT = Big Round Things.


User currently offlineBlackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (6 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 3316 times:

Airgypsy,

I thought the cut-off for low-bypass ratio ended at 2.0 to 1... the JT8D-200 start at 1.76 to 1...


Andrea Kent


User currently offlineMarkC From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 259 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (6 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3285 times:

Is there really a definition of high and low bypass ratios? I don't know if you can really define it as a number.

Number aside, the straight 8's fan is like an early fan or fighter fan design. Multiple stages. An 8D-200 has a single stage fan and is more like a modern fan.


User currently offlineBoeing767mech From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 1021 posts, RR: 3
Reply 15, posted (6 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3279 times:



Quoting Airgypsy (Reply 12):
Otherwise referred to as LRT = Little Round Things and BRT = Big Round Things.

Personally I prefer big round things......................................................................

Easier to inspect.........
I hated trying to check in blades on a JT8. I much rather be standing in the inlet than bent up like a preztel in the inlet.

David



Never under-estimate the predictably of stupidty
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic J-52 / JT8D / Swedish RM-8 Turbofan: Spool-up Time
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Embraer 135-145 Engine Spool-Up Procedure posted Sat Dec 30 2006 07:28:49 by N243NW
A320 'spool Up' During Cruising posted Thu Dec 23 2004 13:07:15 by MD80BOY
Engine Spool Up Before Take Off Power posted Mon Apr 16 2001 04:16:06 by Sxmarbury33
Turbofan With Free-spinning Fan Section? posted Thu Dec 27 2007 14:49:58 by KELPkid
Apparent Time While Flying posted Wed Dec 12 2007 10:38:24 by CoolGuy
What Happens If A Crew Goes Over Time - Midflight? posted Mon Dec 10 2007 06:29:56 by Jamesbuk
MD-83 Start Up Sound. posted Fri Dec 7 2007 08:29:26 by Sudden
TurboFan Engine: Fan Operating In Reverse? posted Thu Nov 15 2007 11:24:54 by Guessbb
Captain Extending His Flying Time. posted Tue Nov 6 2007 09:00:23 by Readytotaxi
Payload Range - How They Stack Up posted Fri Oct 5 2007 23:43:26 by WingedMigrator

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format