Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
777 Mechs: "Working Together"- Did It Work?  
User currently offlineReidYYZ From Kyrgyzstan, joined Sep 2005, 536 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2457 times:

With the well known "Working together" program that was (still is??) in force during the building of the 777, being the inclusion of many never before sought after opinions, did it indeed help to make a better aircraft. I'm looking for the maintenance aspect specifically. For those of you familiar with other Boeing products that predate this program (primarily 757, 767) and now have a fair amount of time on type, did the program help make the aircraft better to maintain ie: access, simplification of unnecessarily complicated items/systems, better documentation (TSM,AMM,SRM.....etc), higher use of common -(dash) numbered item, deactivation procedures simplified/better tooling ....etc. I ask to compare to the 757/767 because, some items that you may have come across on these older models you wonder "Well, why did they do it like this...?" Were some oddities repeated?

Ever curious, Reid.

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 1, posted (6 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2412 times:



Quoting ReidYYZ (Thread starter):
With the well known "Working together" program that was (still is??) in force during the building of the 777

Still is. They started using the system to work with operators on other fleets to deal with in-service issues too, although it's too late to redesign a lot of the older stuff.

Tom.


User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16975 posts, RR: 67
Reply 2, posted (6 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2336 times:

I only know two anectodes:

An access hatch had the tech standing inside it on the 767. The light was at the top. Boeing thought that would be a logical place. But of course with the tech inside the light was obscured by said tech's head, and he had to hold a flashlight in his mouth. Boeing heard of this during the "working together programme" and replaced the original design with a light on either side.

Another one was the two piece flap assembly instead of the intended one piece. That way it would fit into existing autoclaves.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic 777 Mechs: "Working Together"- Did It Work?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
"Licensed Aircraft Engineer", What Is It Exactly? posted Fri Aug 5 2005 01:33:35 by Sabena332
Did Turbojets Ever Produce A "buzzsaw" Noise? posted Thu Jun 17 2004 15:57:01 by Happy-flier
"Flicker Vertigo" - Anyone Experienced It? posted Wed Apr 14 2004 02:18:09 by Mr Spaceman
777 GE-90 "dome" Combustion posted Mon Mar 22 2004 05:42:45 by QANTAS747-438
Why Does 777 Have Glass "backup" ADI posted Tue Aug 26 2003 19:34:57 by Jhooper
"Metering......." What Does It Mean? posted Thu Jul 26 2001 22:14:38 by Trickijedi
"Turn Right 095"... Etc. What It Means? posted Mon Mar 19 2001 20:00:33 by Redngold
To Continue The "777 Brakes On Fire..." Topic posted Wed Jul 12 2000 12:14:50 by Cricri
B2 Style "rudder" On Conventional Aircraft? posted Mon Feb 18 2008 13:14:06 by Flexo
Dispatcher Question: "Default" Flight Plans posted Sat Jan 5 2008 19:23:02 by Cubsrule

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format