Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Stage I JT3Ds: Were The DC-8's Nacelles Quieter?  
User currently offlineHappy-flier From Canada, joined Dec 1999, 299 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1558 times:

I know that's not exactly proper grammar - what I mean to ask, of course, is whether the long-duct nacelles on the series -62/-63 Eight provided better noise insulation than those of the non-hushkitted 707 and 720. Here is a takeoff clip filmed by videographer Henry Tenby last year aboard the Honeywell engine testbed aircraft, a 720. I assume these are JT3D1 engines. Immediately what you can hear is the full spectrum of high-pitched compressor scream and whistle; these classic nacelles sure don't seem to offer much in the way of sound insulation, as the core of the fan engine is fully exposed. As we know, the long-duct nacelle on the DC-8 at least directed the bypass around the core to the end of the engine. Did those long nacelles significantly cut noise before any huskitting was applied? Can anyone here who flew on those jets remember a difference in sound quality for passengers sitting in front of the wing?

720 takeoff video

(I put in an embedded player version, but didn't know how to alter the script to turn off autoplay.)

[Edited 2008-03-09 08:59:17]


May the wind be always at your back . . . except during takeoff & landing.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Stage I JT3Ds: Were The DC-8's Nacelles Quieter?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Airlines Coped When The DC-10s Were Grounded posted Sun Dec 17 2006 22:13:46 by Jimbobjoe
Early DC-8 Nacelles: Why The Ponderous Mechanism? posted Wed Dec 8 2004 20:32:43 by Happy-flier
Air Canada's DC-8s: What Were The Interiors Like? posted Mon Dec 6 2004 22:53:01 by Happy-flier
Why Was The DC-3 Cockpit So Leaky? posted Tue Dec 18 2007 14:15:51 by KELPkid
Did The DC-7 Have Any Influences... posted Wed Aug 29 2007 19:55:53 by Blackbird
Lets Praise The DC-10 posted Thu Jun 28 2007 19:41:16 by Mlsrar
The DC-9's Takeoff Length posted Sat Jun 9 2007 13:57:30 by MPLSflyer
The DC-10's Version Of Etops Restrictions? posted Wed Apr 25 2007 14:08:30 by MD11Fanatic
What Was The Range Of The DC-8-62? posted Sun Oct 30 2005 03:01:05 by AmericanB763ER
Was The DC-8-62/-63 Quieter Than The 707-320B/C? posted Thu Oct 20 2005 00:52:19 by Happy-flier

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format