Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Southwest And Cutting Corners.  
User currently offlineAlfa75 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 614 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2071 times:

Ok, this doesn't have anything to do with the latest news about WN. My question is about turns on approach and takeoff.

I flew WN this past weekend PVD-MDW-SAN-BWI-PVD. It was my first time out of PVD, second flight with WN, and second flight out of SAN.

When leaving SAN at about 0710 on Monday we took off heading west and banked for a very hard left turn to go east. I looked out my window and could barely see Coronado Island below us. To me that seemed like a very tight turn. On approach to both BWI and PVD we came in very close to the airport, passed, then did a very sharp 180 degree turn before landing.

I suppose it wouldn't strike me that odd but when I flew out of SAN last year on DL, I remember the pilot coming over the intercom telling us that we would be flying over Mexico as we circled around to head east. That is a much wider turn.

Is this standard WN practice? Does it save fuel by 'cutting corners'?


The best things in life aren't things!
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePilotboi From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 2366 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2060 times:

I highly doubt so. Every airport has standard procedures for departures and arrivals, and these are usually followed, especially during peak hours. And even without these, the aircraft have to follow the instructions of ATC, they can't just turn whenever they feel like it. If anyone could do this, all airlines would take the shortest possible approach or departure as practical.

I think if you want to try to make some theories about things, you should try doing several flights in to the same airport for each airline and then tally it up. But comparing one to the other...there are so many other variables then the airline. The reason for your difference could have been 1 or more of a number of things not even relating to the airline.


User currently offlineWILCO737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 8968 posts, RR: 76
Reply 2, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2040 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Sometimes you get offered a shorter approach than published! Not a 10NM final, more a 5NM final! But this needs to be approved by ATC! you can ask for it if it is possible and if traffic permits, ATC will allow that and you can get that short approach and save a few minutes! But at bigger airports this doesnt happen too often! Smaller airports: you get it  Wink

For the departure, you have to follow the SID (standard instrument departure). And I havent heard of many cases where you can do shortcuts right after take off, because of noise abatement, obstacle situation there etc etc....

WILCO737 (MD11F)
 airplane 



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineQANTAS747-438 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1925 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2021 times:

An example of getting offered a shorter approach happened the other night at LAX. I was working a flight that was coming from northern California (SJC, SMF, OAK... don't remember) and the flight was cleared for the visual over Santa Monica. Light traffic was the reason for the offer. So the plane flew a short downwind and then did a very quick decent and hard right U-turn into LAX. Saved 10 mins or so causing the plane to arrive a little early allowing us to board a full flt and leave on time!


My posts/replies are strictly my opinion and not that of any company, organization, or Southwest Airlines.
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1931 times:

Sharper than this?

http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0802/00373BORDER.PDF


User currently offlineWILCO737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 8968 posts, RR: 76
Reply 5, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1912 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR



Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 4):

Yeah, thats an early and tight turn for sure! But even here I would climb to about 1000' AGL before starting the turn...

WILCO737 (MD11F)
 airplane 



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineAlfa75 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 614 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1839 times:



Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 4):
Sharper than this?

Maybe. If I were a pilot I might be able to understand the chart!  confused 

It is interesting to see that if the right conditions permit ATC would allow it to happen. I don't think it's a bad thing. It was actually kind of fun.

Thanks for the input.



The best things in life aren't things!
User currently offlineAAR90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3466 posts, RR: 47
Reply 7, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1810 times:



Quoting Alfa75 (Reply 6):
Maybe. If I were a pilot I might be able to understand the chart!

It is interesting to see that if the right conditions permit ATC would allow it to happen. I don't think it's a bad thing. It was actually kind of fun.

OPNLguy showed you the STANDARD departure for KSAN. There are not "right conditions" required... it is what virtually ALL eastbound departures fly. OTOH, a Captain making a PA stating you are going to be flying over Mexico is NON-standard.... VERY non-standard! So the WN departure from KSAN reads like it was the normal procedure (the fact that you could see Coronado indicates it was not a tighter than normal turn) while the DL departure was definitely NOT normal. Your arrival descriptions read like standard visual approaches from a "downwind entry." Very normal in good weather at locations with no special noise procedures that prohibit same.



*NO CARRIER* -- A Naval Aviator's worst nightmare!
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1810 times:



Quoting Alfa75 (Reply 6):
Maybe. If I were a pilot I might be able to understand the chart!

Poggi (PGY) is a radio navigational facility about 13 miles from SAN. When taking off from SAN on runway 27, they stay on the published 275 degree heading until 19 miles from PGY (the "D" with the 19 inside), which is about 5-6 miles after takeoff. Once 19 miles from PGY, they make a left turn to a 120 degree heading until intercepting the 260 degree radial from PGY. (Think of a wheel with 360 spokes centered on PGY, and the 260 degree one is roughly west of PGY). You then overfly PGY itself and on to BROWS, and then either to JLI or IPL depending upon where you're going.


User currently offlineAirWillie6475 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 2448 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1783 times:



Quoting Alfa75 (Thread starter):
Ok, this doesn't have anything to do with the latest news about WN. My question is about turns on approach and takeoff.

I flew WN this past weekend PVD-MDW-SAN-BWI-PVD. It was my first time out of PVD, second flight with WN, and second flight out of SAN.

When leaving SAN at about 0710 on Monday we took off heading west and banked for a very hard left turn to go east. I looked out my window and could barely see Coronado Island below us. To me that seemed like a very tight turn. On approach to both BWI and PVD we came in very close to the airport, passed, then did a very sharp 180 degree turn before landing.

I suppose it wouldn't strike me that odd but when I flew out of SAN last year on DL, I remember the pilot coming over the intercom telling us that we would be flying over Mexico as we circled around to head east. That is a much wider turn.

Is this standard WN practice? Does it save fuel by 'cutting corners'?

If you're trying to go EAST while losing time and burning fuel going West, why take your time in performing the U-turn? It's not standard WN practice, it's a standard flying practice. The pilot was probably hand flying the airplane and was using maximum amount of bank to minimize the time in turning the airplane around to the proper course. Maximum banks close to the ground can be uncomfortable for the passengers but believe it or not you can save company money by flying a certain way.


User currently offlineTb727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1576 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1673 times:

This one is really tight, I think it's the tightest DP I've done. Needless to say there is a lot going on on this one. It's really fun watching an F-18 do it too!

http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0802/00903JULIAN.PDF


I did this one yesterday http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0802/00413LEWIS.PDF and kept it especially tight since they were firing artillery in the restricted areas to the south, it was intimidating hearing the guns fire as we were preflighting knowing we were taking off that direction.

Anyways, you aren't going to be really saving any money or fuel by turning early or anything like that, the real savings are in cruise and flying the airplane smoothly and economically following specific profiles for climb and cruise, especially long range cruise.



Too lazy to work, too scared to steal!
User currently onlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21526 posts, RR: 55
Reply 11, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1660 times:



Quoting WILCO737 (Reply 5):
But even here I would climb to about 1000' AGL before starting the turn...

In the US you get 400' before you have to start making turns (if ATC wants you to).

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineWILCO737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 8968 posts, RR: 76
Reply 12, posted (6 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1653 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR



Quoting Mir (Reply 11):
In the US you get 400' before you have to start making turns (if ATC wants you to).

I know, but I said I would climb a little further! dont like turns with that big bird in such low altitudes Big grin

WILCO737 (MD11F)
 airplane 



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Southwest And Cutting Corners.
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Southwest's Speedy Taxis And Takeoffs posted Sat Sep 29 2007 03:26:32 by UAL747
A+P And JAR 66 Licenses posted Wed Mar 12 2008 11:24:56 by Zvocio79
ATC And Shuttle Launch posted Tue Mar 11 2008 02:06:28 by KL773ER
Airports And Gales posted Sun Mar 9 2008 13:34:27 by Oly720man
737-200 Antennae Cables Between Tail And Fuselage? posted Fri Feb 29 2008 08:13:38 by DIA
Redeye Flights And Fuel Consumption posted Sun Feb 24 2008 12:49:12 by GentFromAlaska
B737 And Turbulence posted Fri Feb 22 2008 23:30:39 by Luvaulter
Fuel To Climb Comparison: Empty And Full posted Thu Feb 21 2008 11:19:08 by NCB
Night Currency And Flight Instruction posted Thu Feb 14 2008 07:29:06 by FlyMKG
Wet, Damp And Dry Lease posted Thu Feb 14 2008 01:50:49 by B7X7

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format