Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
30 Hour TAF  
User currently offlineFuturecaptain From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1613 times:

I just read the NWS is changing the format of TAF's in the US to conform more with international standards and the new TAF will be valid for 30 hours.
What do you all think of this?

http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/notification/scn08-15_30hr_taf.txt
http://aviationweather.gov/notice/taf30.php

It doesn't look like a major change in how it is read. Different date/time format throughout. I'm sure like many things though it will have a rocky start with the people not expecting this.
Change comes in November.

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineYWG From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 1147 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1611 times:

It's nothing that a skilled pilot and a GFA couldn't tell you!


Contact Winnipeg center now on 134.4, good day.
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21795 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1606 times:

Not much change there. The only slightly confusing thing is the presence of all the extra dates in places where they weren't before. But nothing you can't get used to.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineTb727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1629 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 1549 times:

More mumbo jumbo. Will they actually be able to guess the weather 30 hours ahead correctly is what I am looking forward to seeing.


Too lazy to work, too scared to steal!
User currently offlineDispatchguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1249 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (6 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1466 times:

They cant get the first 6 hours correct now, why add more time thats going to be wrong anyway...


Nobody screws you better than an airline job!
User currently offlineJetset From Canada, joined Jun 2001, 353 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1427 times:

Here in Canada, Enviornment Canada can't get the first 3 hours correct. The worst that I have seen personally
is 20 TAFS for CYHZ in 24 hours. Case in point here today nothing is going on in the weather and they still can't
get it right :

TAF AMD CYHZ 161121Z 161106 35008KT P6SM OVC003 TEMPO 1113 SCT003
BKN010
FM1300Z 33010KT P6SM FEW015 BKN150 TEMPO 1315 BKN015
FM1500Z 33010KT P6SM SCT060
BECMG 0204 15005KT
RMK NXT FCST BY 12Z

CYHZ 161138Z 161212 35008KT P6SM OVC003 TEMPO 1213 SCT003 BKN010
FM1300Z 33010KT P6SM FEW015 BKN150 TEMPO 1315 BKN015
FM1500Z 33010KT P6SM SCT060
BECMG 0204 15005KT
FM1100Z 09008KT P6SM SCT060 BKN120
RMK NXT FCST BY 15Z

TAF AMD CYHZ 161038Z 161006 33010KT P6SM BKN006 BKN150 TEMPO 1012
OVC004
FM1200Z 33010KT P6SM FEW015 BKN150 TEMPO 1213 BKN015
FM1700Z 34010KT P6SM SCT060
BECMG 0204 15005KT
RMK NXT FCST BY 12Z

CYHZ 160838Z 160906 35010KT P6SM FEW015 BKN120 TEMPO 0912 BKN015
FM1700Z 34010KT P6SM SCT060
BECMG 0204 15005KT
RMK NXT FCST BY 12Z

CYHZ 160538Z 160606 34007KT P6SM FEW030 BKN080
FM0900Z 34010KT P6SM FEW015 TEMPO 0912 BKN015
FM1700Z 34010KT P6SM SCT060
RMK NXT FCST BY 09Z


Officials at Enviornment Canada claim they are more accurate than the NWS. I say ask the Dispatchers that
work Transborder flights and let them decide who is better. My money is on the NWS.

Rgds / Jetset


User currently offlineGoldenshield From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 6094 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (6 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1424 times:



Quoting Jetset (Reply 5):
Here in Canada, Enviornment Canada can't get the first 3 hours correct

Also, they tend to WAY over-do the TAF with things like BKN019, SCT234, etc. And then there are the nested TAFs.

2305 10SM BKN025
TEMPO 2305 1SM OVC001
PROB 30 2305 5SM OVC020

Which, to mean screams that they don't know what the hell they are doing, and basically making an all-around cover-all TAF.



Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic 30 Hour TAF
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Su-30 Airbrake On A Civilian Aircraft? posted Thu Dec 27 2007 18:18:31 by Alessandro
"Broken" DC-10-30 posted Tue Sep 4 2007 19:07:16 by Fxfan
TF-30 Nozzle Bypass Doors On F-111 posted Thu Apr 26 2007 07:32:34 by SCAT15F
DC-8-30 Icao Code posted Sat Apr 14 2007 00:04:54 by Ratherbflyin
Flight Crew Rotation On 17-hour Flight posted Mon Jan 1 2007 22:34:28 by Jawed
Fadec Or EEC On DC-10-30? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 01:50:47 by MD11Fanatic
Single-color Nacelles: 30,000 Gal Per Year Saving posted Wed Oct 4 2006 20:12:38 by Keta
DC-10-30 Extra Wing Fairing posted Thu Jul 13 2006 01:53:45 by Dispatcher
50, 40, 30, 20, Retard, Retard....why? posted Wed Feb 15 2006 20:22:41 by Leigh pilgrim
Why The Extra Bogie On DC10-30? posted Thu Jan 5 2006 22:00:40 by SK909
Fadec Or EEC On DC-10-30? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 01:50:47 by MD11Fanatic
Single-color Nacelles: 30,000 Gal Per Year Saving posted Wed Oct 4 2006 20:12:38 by Keta
DC-10-30 Extra Wing Fairing posted Thu Jul 13 2006 01:53:45 by Dispatcher
50, 40, 30, 20, Retard, Retard....why? posted Wed Feb 15 2006 20:22:41 by Leigh pilgrim

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format