Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Would A Raked Tailplane Help?  
User currently offlineHypersonic From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2005, 149 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 7 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2271 times:

Hi All,
Seems that accumulative fuel savings are being achieved by adding firstly winglets onto airliners both big & small.
More recently we're seeing either blended winglets or Raked tips.

However, the tail-plane, esp on larger aircraft like the 777, MD-11 etc, DO produce draggy vortices to a lesser degree. Therefore raking them with a positive twist, thus creating a slight forward thrust component, similar to the rakes on the 777-300 would surely help.

See this link in large view for an example of the tailplane creating draggy vortices like the wings.

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1237444/L/

Just a thought...
Hyper

[Edited 2008-05-28 09:17:46]

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineZuluAviator994 From Australia, joined Mar 2008, 510 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 7 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2196 times:

Hm...i suppose, but I believe the extra weight would probably offset the benefits...
And as you see on the picture, the vortices aren't that great on the tailplane, and like I just said, I think more fuel would be burned than saved
Heck, let's let the guys in the biz answer... Wink
Rgrds



If Speed is life, Altitude is life insurance. No one has ever collided with the sky.
User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8956 posts, RR: 60
Reply 2, posted (6 years 7 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2194 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR



Quoting Hypersonic (Thread starter):
However, the tail-plane, esp on larger aircraft like the 777, MD-11 etc, DO produce draggy vortices to a lesser degree.

They do, but not so much in cruise flight.

The aircraft in the photo you reference is in landing configuration with flaps down. The flaps create a pitching moment that must be counteracted by the horizontal stabilizer. We can see vorticies in that photo because the horizontal stabilizer is creating lift of its own, compensating for the pitching moment created by the flaps.

In cruise flight, the flaps are retracted and the horizontal stabilizer creates little to no lift of its own. Thus, little to no induced drag is created, and wingtip devices would offer little to no benefit.

2H4



Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineBoeingOnFinal From Norway, joined Apr 2006, 476 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 7 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2162 times:



Quoting 2H4 (Reply 2):
The aircraft in the photo you reference is in landing configuration with flaps down. The flaps create a pitching moment that must be counteracted by the horizontal stabilizer. We can see vorticies in that photo because the horizontal stabilizer is creating lift of its own, compensating for the pitching moment created by the flaps.

Many airliners with autoland capability (if not all?) trim nose up on final approach (don't remember the height, modes etc, probably differ from aircraft and manufacturer), which must be counteracted with elevator down. I believe this is to speed up the transition for a go-around in case of windshear or other situations where climb pitch is crucial. Type Rated pilots might have some more insight on this subject though.

But as 2H4 states, with a variable incidence tailplane the lift created by the horisontal stabiliser is not much in cruise. As far as my knowledge goes, the raked wingtips are there to reduce induced drag (a product of lift), and would not help on form drag nor friction drag. An aircraft that can vary it's C of G by moving fuel, has almost zero tail load. An airliner with the right C of G position could also encounter a situation with minimal tail loading. Thus, not much help in trying to reduce induced drag, when there is minimal lift, which means minimal induced drag to begin with.



norwegianpilot.blogspot.com
User currently offlineRwessel From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2429 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (6 years 7 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2138 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Also, there's really nothing you can accomplish with winglets or raked wingtips that a better (usually longer) wing can't do better. Since there's rarely any length limitation on the horizontal stabilizer, if there are issues with tip-vortex losses in cruise (and as others have pointed out, there usually isn't), you can just increase the aspect ratio.

User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21882 posts, RR: 55
Reply 5, posted (6 years 7 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2138 times:



Quoting BoeingOnFinal (Reply 3):
Many airliners with autoland capability (if not all?) trim nose up on final approach (don't remember the height, modes etc, probably differ from aircraft and manufacturer), which must be counteracted with elevator down. I believe this is to speed up the transition for a go-around in case of windshear or other situations where climb pitch is crucial.

It's more because that's the angle of attack it takes to fly at the approach speed. If you fly slower, you have to pitch up more to maintain the same amount of lift.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineBoeingOnFinal From Norway, joined Apr 2006, 476 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 7 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2016 times:



Quoting Mir (Reply 5):
It's more because that's the angle of attack it takes to fly at the approach speed. If you fly slower, you have to pitch up more to maintain the same amount of lift.

That is true, for a given AoA, weight and C of G the tailplane loading would be the same regardless of trim. Good observation  Smile



norwegianpilot.blogspot.com
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Would A Raked Tailplane Help?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Can Someone Help Me With Operating Costs For A DC9 posted Fri May 23 2008 09:35:10 by A380US
Some Technical Questions, Any Help Appreciated posted Wed Apr 23 2008 12:17:28 by Speedbird001
Need Help On Research Paper posted Sun Apr 6 2008 16:32:37 by MCOflyer
An Idea, Thought I Would Float It Here(Fuel Redx) posted Sun Apr 6 2008 10:32:20 by Osiris30
Winglets Versus Raked Versus Fence posted Wed Apr 2 2008 07:53:16 by Hypersonic
Saudi Arabian Timetable Need Help! SV1997/796... posted Mon Mar 10 2008 17:23:22 by 22886
Help Needed ID'ing Photo posted Sun Mar 9 2008 20:48:53 by Mark5388916
Help Wanted: Swaying During Takeoff? posted Sat Mar 1 2008 14:41:24 by JetBlueGuy2006
Aircraft Dispatcher Help posted Tue Feb 5 2008 23:10:00 by Fxfan
Need Help From A KLM Insider posted Tue Feb 5 2008 06:03:30 by Yago
Help Needed ID'ing Photo posted Sun Mar 9 2008 20:48:53 by Mark5388916
Help Wanted: Swaying During Takeoff? posted Sat Mar 1 2008 14:41:24 by JetBlueGuy2006
Aircraft Dispatcher Help posted Tue Feb 5 2008 23:10:00 by Fxfan
When Would *I* Remove *my* Heels? posted Thu Sep 19 2013 22:03:05 by Grisee08

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format