Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Question About Winglets  
User currently offlineAT777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 193 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2805 times:

Lately (4-5 years) airlines have been applying winglets on their planes. We all know that winglets add fuel economy. With the way fuel costs are and they look like they are not going to go down any time soon, is it possible to put winglets on the horizontal stabilizers somehow? I know it might sound funny or look funny, but if they help on the wings, can they not help on the stabilizers? This is just something I have been thinking about for the past couple of weeks now.

Ashley in CLT

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2799 times:



Quoting AT777 (Thread starter):
is it possible to put winglets on the horizontal stabilizers somehow?

No.... is does not added benefits by doing so.



"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineKcrwFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3834 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2782 times:

The B1900D has them, but I think thats more of a stability thing due to using the same tail as the Kingair.

User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2760 times:

Quoting KcrwFlyer (Reply 2):
The B1900D has them

Not really the same. Those are way inboard of the tip and only added because of the changes from the C model to the D model due to the raised roof. Beech had two option....1) a total redesign of the tail... or 2) add the strakes on the tail and deliver faster. Like you said, it was for stability reason due to the air flow over the raised roof on the D.

[Edited 2008-07-21 16:16:58]


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5875 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2697 times:

Because the H-tail doesn't provide the primary lifting force, it wouldn't add benefit. There's no point in increasing the efficiency of a wing that barely flies in cruise.
Further, any right angles you make create vortices. This is true even of blended winglets- they're very small, and that's why the blended technology was developed, but they're still present.
On the main wing, this minor addition of drag is more than overcome by the improved efficiency of the airfoil, hence a 5-6% reduction in fuel burn.
But on the tail, it wouldn't be so.
So, in conclusion, you'd be adding drag to a wing that doesn't require any improved lifting efficiency.

In the future, you might have more luck posting items like this in the 'tech-ops' forum. That way, you cater to a more... cough, knowledgeable base of folk.
Flame on, folks.


User currently offlineAT777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 193 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2652 times:

Yeah I just got the email about it being moved to this forum. That's my bad.
Thanks for all the feed back.


User currently offlineAeroWeanie From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 1610 posts, RR: 52
Reply 6, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2560 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Winglets work by reducing the induced drag of a lifting surface. The penalty is that they increase the parasitic drag.

Induced drag increases by the square of the lift load on the surface. Horizontal tails don't carry much load in cruise flight, so they don't generate much induced drag. A winglet on the horizontal tail would then just increase the parasitic drag. Hence, winglets wouldn't do any good on a horizontal tail.

The Beech 1900 has the things hanging down from the horizontal tail to add directional stability. The 1900 was created by stretching a King Air 200, including using the tail with minimum changes. The aircraft was found to need more longitudinal and directional stability, so the horsals and little verticals were added to address each issue respectively. I should note that the 1900 also has a different inboard wing and nacelle than the King Air 200.

1900C and 1900D:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Md Faridz
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Art Brett - Photovation Images



User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5875 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2454 times:



Quoting AeroWeanie (Reply 6):
Induced drag increases by the square of the lift load on the surface. Horizontal tails don't carry much load in cruise flight, so they don't generate much induced drag. A winglet on the horizontal tail would then just increase the parasitic drag. Hence, winglets wouldn't do any good on a horizontal tail.

Your post was more concise, more eloquent, and more correct than mine... nice job.

Quoting AeroWeanie (Reply 6):
The 1900 was created by stretching a King Air 200,

Indeed, and the -200 by stretching the -90, although it got a new tail.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Question About Winglets
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Question About 737s And Winglets posted Thu Oct 17 2002 01:45:14 by Clickhappy
Question About 4-6 Seat Aircraft posted Mon May 19 2008 19:33:45 by MSP718
Question About 737-500 Cockpit (Pic). posted Sat May 3 2008 01:48:02 by Cumulus
Question About Jet Throttles posted Mon Apr 28 2008 17:15:28 by Ngr
Question About Electro-chromatic Dimmable Windows posted Sat Apr 5 2008 03:51:35 by Beaucaire
Question About The 24hrs Before Your Flight posted Sat Jan 19 2008 18:15:06 by FastEddie07
Question About 767 Landing Gear Position posted Sun Jan 13 2008 10:44:21 by USADreamliner
Question About 767-200 Vs. 767-200ER posted Thu Nov 8 2007 12:46:59 by Absimilliard
Question About R/T posted Mon Oct 1 2007 00:57:04 by Ajd1992
Question About Aircraft At Cruising Alttitude posted Wed Sep 26 2007 04:27:44 by Mike89406

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format