Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Landing Gear Never Retracted Dash 8 RJ Flight  
User currently offlineSaambas From Australia, joined Jul 2008, 5 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 12 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 4867 times:

In December 2006 I took a Dash8 400 series flight on Royal Jordanian Airlines from Aleppo, Syria to Amman, Jordon.

I was seated directly next to the landing gear, and was amazed to find they were completely extended during the whole flight!
There was no announcement from the Captain about any issues with the plane, however I did note that the flight time was a lot longer than usual. Flight time on this sector is usually around 45 minutes, but today we were in the air for around 1.25 minutes.
It was a very cold morning in Aleppo (possibly still below 0C when we took off), and the aircraft had been overnighted on the turn around.

Is this common on Dash8 flights? My immediate thought was their was a problem with the gear but captain just decided to continue to Amman with the gear extended.

Can anyone think of any reason or issue with this situation?

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLowrider From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 3220 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (5 years 12 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 4838 times:

The gear may have been pinned down for a maintenance reason. Some aircraft are permitted to conduct revenue flights like this. There are a variety of performance issues to account for, but it does not diminish safety. Cruise speed would probably be affected, and it would require more fuel, but if the only other option may have been a cancellation.


Proud OOTSK member
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31667 posts, RR: 56
Reply 2, posted (5 years 12 months 3 days ago) and read 4399 times:

Mx issue requiring the Gear to be extended for Flight,thus need for speed reduction to avoid Gear damage.
Out here though it would need to be a ferry flight & not a revenue flight.

regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlinePGNCS From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 2821 posts, RR: 45
Reply 3, posted (5 years 12 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4327 times:



Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 2):
Mx issue requiring the Gear to be extended for Flight,thus need for speed reduction to avoid Gear damage.
Out here though it would need to be a ferry flight & not a revenue flight.

Here it depends on what's in the MEL...some aircraft in our fleet must be ferried with no passengers onboard, while others are allowed to operate in revenue service with passengers with the gear down. (I honestly don't know why the difference exists.)

Obviously this is normally a one time deal to get the plane to a maintenance station to repair whatever the problem is. The plane will have to be operated below the maximum gear extended speed, which will increase flight time significantly. Also increasing significantly (VERY significantly, in fact) will be fuel burn, as others have alluded to.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31667 posts, RR: 56
Reply 4, posted (5 years 12 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4198 times:



Quoting PGNCS (Reply 3):
(I honestly don't know why the difference exists.)

Obviously this is normally a one time deal to get the plane to a maintenance station to repair whatever the problem is.

Out here the justification by the Regulatory Authorities is to avoid Pax casualties in case of a ferry,as purpose is to get the aircraft to a Mx base for repairs hence no revenue service provided.

regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently onlineDashTrash From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 1520 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (5 years 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4092 times:



Quoting PGNCS (Reply 3):
Here it depends on what's in the MEL...some aircraft in our fleet must be ferried with no passengers onboard, while others are allowed to operate in revenue service with passengers with the gear down. (I honestly don't know why the difference exists.)

Obviously this is normally a one time deal to get the plane to a maintenance station to repair whatever the problem is. The plane will have to be operated below the maximum gear extended speed, which will increase flight time significantly. Also increasing significantly (VERY significantly, in fact) will be fuel burn, as others have alluded to.

Single engine performance is why. A -100 isn't going to climb much on one motor and much weight in it. A -300 would be a little better, but not much.

I had to ferry one from HXD-SBY with the gear pinned a few years ago. Empty, no flight attendant, it wouldn't go much over 10,000 ft, and it wouldn't go anywhere near the 172 kt Vle when we got there. It'll go past 172 kts at lower altitudes with the gear down, but single engine performance on the Dash is lousy with the gear down.

Don't know why someone would leave it down on a revenue flight unless they forgot to retract it. That has happened before....


User currently offlineCharlienorth From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 1119 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (5 years 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4077 times:



Quoting Lowrider (Reply 1):
The gear may have been pinned down for a maintenance reason. Some aircraft are permitted to conduct revenue flights like this. There are a variety of performance issues to account for, but it does not diminish safety. Cruise speed would probably be affected, and it would require more fuel, but if the only other option may have been a cancellation

At simmons?AMR Eagle we sometimes needed to place the gear system (SD360 & ATR's) on MEL with the provision they were locked down,we would use thes aircraft on ORD-MKE & ORD-SBN trips.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31667 posts, RR: 56
Reply 7, posted (5 years 12 months 10 hours ago) and read 3967 times:



Quoting PGNCS (Reply 3):
some aircraft in our fleet must be ferried with no passengers onboard, while others are allowed to operate in revenue service with passengers with the gear down.

Is this common for all US Airlines?
regds
MEL.



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlinePGNCS From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 2821 posts, RR: 45
Reply 8, posted (5 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3847 times:



Quoting DashTrash (Reply 5):
Quoting PGNCS (Reply 3):
Here it depends on what's in the MEL...some aircraft in our fleet must be ferried with no passengers onboard, while others are allowed to operate in revenue service with passengers with the gear down. (I honestly don't know why the difference exists.)

Obviously this is normally a one time deal to get the plane to a maintenance station to repair whatever the problem is. The plane will have to be operated below the maximum gear extended speed, which will increase flight time significantly. Also increasing significantly (VERY significantly, in fact) will be fuel burn, as others have alluded to.

Single engine performance is why. A -100 isn't going to climb much on one motor and much weight in it. A -300 would be a little better, but not much.

Sorry Dash, I wasn't specific enough. I was not talking specifically about a single aircraft type (Dash 8) or set of subtypes. I was referring to a very large fleet of several types (and many variants) of large turbojets. Obviously Climb Limit Weight has to be considered for the gear down condition, but for the sectors in question it would not be limiting on any of the types. I apologize if I was unclear. It seems as though certain manufacturers elected to allow it for some models, and others elected not to.

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 7):
Quoting PGNCS (Reply 3):
some aircraft in our fleet must be ferried with no passengers onboard, while others are allowed to operate in revenue service with passengers with the gear down.

Is this common for all US Airlines?

I don't know about all US airlines, but it is common at my current airline and the other two I have worked for as well. I'm sorry I can't be completely authoritative, I don't have a good link to the FAA MMELs.


User currently offlineA10WARTHOG From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 324 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (5 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3786 times:



Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 7):
Quoting PGNCS (Reply 3):
some aircraft in our fleet must be ferried with no passengers onboard, while others are allowed to operate in revenue service with passengers with the gear down.

Is this common for all US Airlines?

I think the big difference is it all depends on the manufacture and I would say the airline. The ERJ I worked you could not MEL the retraction/extendtion system, so if the plane had to fly gear down it was pinned and ferried. But I have heard of CRJ flying revenue with gear down and pinned.

I would also think the airline MOC and dispatch would take into account: Do you have a spare aircraft that can make the trip and where does the broke plane go to be fixed? Sometime the hubs are not the best place to take the plane, if they are busy and you have an outstation that can fix the plane, ferry the plane there get it fixed and repo it where you need it.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31667 posts, RR: 56
Reply 10, posted (5 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3779 times:



Quoting A10WARTHOG (Reply 9):
Sometime the hubs are not the best place to take the plane, if they are busy and you have an outstation that can fix the plane, ferry the plane there get it fixed and repo it where you need it.

L/G problems require at times a retraction test, that needs a Hangar.Outstations it might be tougher to get one on hire cheap.

regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineA10WARTHOG From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 324 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (5 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3757 times:



Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 10):
Outstations it might be tougher to get one on hire cheap.

I should have chose better wording, I mean an outstation with airline MX personal there. Many have a hangar. The one I worked at we had hangar that could hold three airplanes. From our station we only flew to two locations. They would ferry in planes that where broke, to take the load off the hubs.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31667 posts, RR: 56
Reply 12, posted (5 years 11 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3669 times:



Quoting A10WARTHOG (Reply 11):

True if the company has a hangar at a less congested place,its def cheaper then.

regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Landing Gear Never Retracted Dash 8 RJ Flight
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Landing Gear Down In Mid Flight? posted Thu Sep 13 2007 18:51:09 by 747LUVR
737NG Landing Gear posted Fri Jul 25 2008 11:39:30 by AeroWeanie
Middle Landing Gear On Airbus 340 posted Tue Jun 10 2008 22:36:35 by Oasis
Landing Gear Extension / Retraction Videos. posted Sun Mar 9 2008 12:03:33 by JetMech
A320 Landing Gear posted Fri Jan 18 2008 03:30:40 by BritJap
Question About 767 Landing Gear Position posted Sun Jan 13 2008 10:44:21 by USADreamliner
A380 Landing Gear posted Sun Jan 6 2008 22:29:04 by Downunderontop
DC-8 Castoring Main Landing Gear posted Sat Dec 29 2007 09:38:35 by Blackbird
A380 Landing Gear Retraction Videos? posted Mon Dec 17 2007 19:14:40 by GearDownPlease
Unique Landing Gear Designs posted Sun Dec 2 2007 14:42:38 by 747Dreamlifter

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format