Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Cessna 421 Successor?  
User currently offlineLordarpad From Ireland, joined Jul 2008, 16 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 4 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4125 times:

Hiya

I have been thinking about a potential successor to the Cessna 421 using the aerodynamics of the Piaggio Avanti P.180 and the 4l Centurion Diesel engines.

I figure that one should be able to get up to something like 260 to 300 kts with 2 + 5 seats and potty, as well as something like 1500 nm range.

Does anybody see merit in that kind of plane?

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWingscrubber From UK - England, joined Sep 2001, 854 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 4 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4075 times:

The Citation Mustang already fills that gap, it cruises 340 knots for 1167 nm range, and seats up to 5 plus pilots, according to wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_Citation_Mustang

I like the sound of your idea though... definately feasible, question is who will buy it while VLJs are so in-vogue.



Resident TechOps Troll
User currently offlineLordarpad From Ireland, joined Jul 2008, 16 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (6 years 4 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 4018 times:

VLJs have tiny cabins and are a fair bit more expensive (especially fuelwise!) than what I am envisioning.

I am simply thinking that we will live to see 300$/barrel oil prices and that one probably won't want to fly jets when that has happened. Also the bird itself would be cheaper.


User currently offlineMeister808 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 973 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (6 years 4 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 4014 times:

I think the aircraft we have currently filling this market segment most directly would be the enormously successful Pilatus PC-12. Compare fuel burns, speeds, cabin volumes, and you will see the 2 aircraft are very close.

-Meister



Twin Cessna 812 Victor, Minneapolis Center, we observe your operation in the immediate vicinity of extreme precipitation
User currently offlineLordarpad From Ireland, joined Jul 2008, 16 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (6 years 4 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 4009 times:

My problem is

a) fuel consumption of a turboprop and
b) the single-enginedness of the PC-12, as in Europe you are a bit more likely to fly over
water. Climb rate after engine failure for the PC-12 frankly sucks  Wink


User currently offlineLordarpad From Ireland, joined Jul 2008, 16 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 4 months 6 days ago) and read 3996 times:

Centurion 4.0 fuel burn is 11.6 gph so for 2 engines we are talking about 23.2 gph compared to the PC-12's 64 gph ...

The PC-12 is not exactly aerodynamically advanced IMO


User currently offlineMeister808 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 973 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (6 years 4 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3967 times:



Quoting Lordarpad (Reply 4):
b) the single-enginedness of the PC-12, as in Europe you are a bit more likely to fly over
water. Climb rate after engine failure for the PC-12 frankly sucks

Well, yeah, but I think the failure rate of a PT6-A67 compared to the failure rate of the old GTSIO-520 is enough risk management for me if I'm sitting behind the controls. Hell, there's even the old argument that a single is safer if an engine quits close to the ground because there's less of a decision to make. I'm not sure I agree too much with that one, but you will have it. I'm not sure what the failure rate of the Centurion 4.0 is, but I'd imagine even if it is very good it will have miles to go before it gets close to a turboprop.

Quoting Lordarpad (Reply 5):
Centurion 4.0 fuel burn is 11.6 gph so for 2 engines we are talking about 23.2 gph compared to the PC-12's 64 gph ...

I was comparing the 421 to the PC-12, and I was basing the numbers on 350-400 pph for the Pilatus and about 350 pph for the 421. You are correct, the Centurion would greatly shift the economics.

-Meister



Twin Cessna 812 Victor, Minneapolis Center, we observe your operation in the immediate vicinity of extreme precipitation
User currently offlineLordarpad From Ireland, joined Jul 2008, 16 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (6 years 4 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3935 times:

well, that is why I am thinking successor. The Centurion 4.0 will hopefully eventually be usable for reengining the 421, but the 421 is a bit on the slow side. And for the kind of run I am envisioning like EIWT to BMA or ideally to ESCM and shit weather over Irish Sea and North Sea I think I'd still be more comfy with 2 engines.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Cessna 421 Successor?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Cessna 310 Question posted Thu May 22 2008 15:41:07 by MSP718
Cessna Citation Columbus posted Thu Feb 7 2008 05:54:12 by HAWK21M
Cessna Stationair Etc. Weight And Balance Issues? posted Thu Jan 3 2008 13:19:27 by TupolevTu154
I Want To Buy A Scrap Cessna posted Sun Oct 7 2007 23:21:15 by Quetzal
High Time Cessna Conquests Grounded? posted Sat Aug 25 2007 10:02:24 by Curmudgeon
April, 1962 - Cessna Marketing Execs Get Desperate posted Tue Aug 7 2007 00:28:12 by 2H4
Cessna 172 Info Needed For Novel posted Sat Dec 2 2006 05:00:32 by Mrmgraphics
Weight & Balance For Cessna 208 (or Other) posted Sun Oct 22 2006 11:18:26 by Flybyguy
The Cessna Cutlass posted Tue Oct 10 2006 02:29:49 by Arch89U
Cessna 172 Trim posted Tue Jun 27 2006 23:52:07 by Bruce

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format