Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question  
User currently offlineVimanav From India, joined Jul 2003, 1516 posts, RR: 14
Posted (6 years 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 9277 times:

Apart from the fact that the A320-214 has CFM56-5B4 or -5B4/P engines and the -216 has CFM56-5B6 engines is there a higher take off weight (77000kgs) for the latter model? Which other 320 variant with CFM engines has a 77000kgs MTOW?

Appreciate comments.

brgds//Pran


Sarfaroshi kii tamannaa ab hamaare dil mein hai, Dekhnaa hai zor kitnaa baazu-e-qaatil mein hai
17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17054 posts, RR: 67
Reply 1, posted (6 years 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 9215 times:

AFAIK the only other 320 variant with CFM engines is the -212. Don't know the MTOW.

-212 = CFM56-5A3
-214 = CFM56-5B4/P or CFM56-5B4/2P
-216 = CFM56-5B4/p (Uprated by 300 lb)



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4683 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (6 years 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 9156 times:



Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 1):
AFAIK the only other 320 variant with CFM engines is the -212

Ah, how dare you forget the -211 with the 5A1!  biggrin  On top of that, there's the -215 with the -5B5/P engine.

Information about each model and the corresponding weight options can be found here:

http://www.easa.europa.eu/ws_prod/c/...0Iss%204%20dtd%2017%20Jul%2008.pdf



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17054 posts, RR: 67
Reply 3, posted (6 years 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 9119 times:



Quoting A342 (Reply 2):

Ah, how dare you forget the -211 with the 5A1! biggrin On top of that, there's the -215 with the -5B5/P engine

Heh. People forget to send me updates. I can hardly be blamed for this.  Wink

http://www.rosboch.net/aviation.htm#Codes



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4683 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (6 years 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 9014 times:



Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 3):
Heh. People forget to send me updates. I can hardly be blamed for this.

No problem. Apart from that, there never was an A320-100 with IAE engines, so the -131 version doesn't exist. And using the link I provided, you can add data for the A321-212/213.
There's also the A380-842 with the Trent 970B (or so I think).
Some HGW versions of the A345/6 use more powerful engines, the -643 has the Trent 560 and the -542 has the Trent 556.



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17054 posts, RR: 67
Reply 5, posted (6 years 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 9009 times:

Thanks man! I'll update again later.


"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineLASOctoberB6 From Japan, joined Nov 2006, 2380 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (6 years 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 8980 times:



Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 1):
-212 = CFM56-5A3

Is that the engine the older HP birds use?



[NOT IN SERVICE] {WEStJet}
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17054 posts, RR: 67
Reply 7, posted (6 years 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 8966 times:

All updated thanks. I'll double check the existing ones with that pdf some other day. No time now. Sick kid x2 in da house.  Sad


"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineTS-IOR From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 3488 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (5 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 8737 times:

Rare are the 215 and 216 variants ! The most commons are -211, -212, -214. Difference remains in the appelation, and the power !

For A32S, IAE engines are most powerful.


User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4683 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (5 years 12 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 8639 times:



Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 7):

Hi, I noticed a glitch with the A320-216. It is actually powered by the -5B6/P. Compared to the -5B4/P, it actually has less thrust, hence the lower takeoff weights.

And I feel guilty for not giving the exact designations for the A340-643, which is powered by the Trent 560A2-61. Same goes for the -542, it is powered by the Trent 556A2-61.



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4683 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (5 years 12 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 8620 times:

Whoops, a mistake on my part. The A380-842 is actually powered by either the Trent 972-84 or Trent 972B-84, the -841 is powered by either Trent 970-84 or Trent 970B-84.


Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17054 posts, RR: 67
Reply 11, posted (5 years 12 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 8603 times:

Thanks for the updates. I'll fix that later.


"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineLH707330 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 788 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (8 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 2898 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 3):
Heh. People forget to send me updates. I can hardly be blamed for this. Wink

Based on my read of this, it looks like the last number meaning a certain engine only works within a type (A3XX), not types within the family, which doesn't quite make sense to me. For example, An A340-313 and an A340-213 have exactly the same engine, the CFM56-5C4, whereas an A319-112 and an A320-212 have different engines. Structurally, these two sets of planes are rather analogous (one of each pair is a slight shrink), so why not keep the same engine designation numbers? If I were in a MX team, I would find it much easier to memorize one set of last numbers that correspond to an entire family (e.g. A32X-X33 always has a V2527) than have to get it for each of the different members.

Also, I've read a number of seemingly conflicting things regarding the HGW/non-HGW designations about the A340-500/600. On your site, the A340 500/600 appear to have a consistent designation for engine types, as follows:
A340-541: T553
A340-X42 (where X can be 5 or 6): T556
A340-643: T560

I've seen in numerous posts that the HGW variants have an "X" appended to their designation, and that both have the 380 ton MTOW and more powerful engines. Thus, I would expect the entire family to look like this:

A340-541: T553, 372 t MTOW
A340-542X: T556, 380 t MTOW (HGW version)
A340-642: T556, 368 t MTOW
A340-643X: T560, 380 t MTOW (HGW version)

Now, there are plenty of pictures of LH A340-600s in the a.net database, and as far as I can see they're all labeled "A340-642." On LH-taufnamen, the last 10 of them (D-AIHP-D-AIHZ) are listed as A340-642X. Does this mean that LH bought 380 t A340-600s with T556 engines, or is there an inconsistent labeling format? If so, what's the correct one?


User currently offlinestrfyr51 From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 1252 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (8 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2823 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

the A320 models 211-214-216 231-232-233 can be ordered with any variation of weight variations or engines either CFM56-5B
for the 21X or v2500 for the23X. the highest weight variants were wv7,10,12 77T mgwt, 15 and 17 with 78T
I paged thru the SRM and found NO wv-17's , a few -15's, and a L:OT of 10's 77T, (mostly ordered by UAL and AmWest (now American via USAir).
The Problem with the A320 is the Life limit of 48K Hrs and 37.5K cycles unless the life extension si done for 80K hrs and 48K cycles. This might rule out A320's as freighters in the coming years.


User currently offlineLH707330 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 788 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (8 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2689 times:

Quoting strfyr51 (Reply 13):

Thanks! Does this same pattern hold true for the A340s as well, where the MTOW and engine combos can be swapped around? IIRC, the T500 is the same engine anyway, and the thrust level is a software issue, do you know if you can buy a 380 ton frame with the weaker engines?


User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17054 posts, RR: 67
Reply 15, posted (8 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2650 times:

Quoting LH707330 (Reply 14):
Thanks! Does this same pattern hold true for the A340s as well, where the MTOW and engine combos can be swapped around? IIRC, the T500 is the same engine anyway, and the thrust level is a software issue, do you know if you can buy a 380 ton frame with the weaker engines?

Certainly you can get engines at different ratings, so I assume you can get different MTOW options.

A340
-211/311 = CFM56-5C2
-212/312 = CFM56-5C3
-213/313 = CFM56-5C4
-541 = Trent 553-61
-542 = Trent 556A2-61
-642 = Trent 556-61
-643 = Trent 560A2-61



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineLH707330 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 788 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (8 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2598 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 15):

Does this mean that a LH A340-642X has the T556 and the 380 t MTOW?


User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17054 posts, RR: 67
Reply 17, posted (8 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 2583 times:

Quoting LH707330 (Reply 16):
Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 15):

Does this mean that a LH A340-642X has the T556 and the 380 t MTOW?

All I can tell you is that it had the 556-61. I don't know about the MTOW.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
B737-7-8-9 & A320-1 Question posted Fri Apr 15 2005 07:01:51 by TACAA320
A319 Vs A320 Fuel Question posted Sat Jul 26 2008 06:19:20 by Panais
A380 & 787 Landing Gear Question posted Thu Nov 1 2007 01:36:40 by BritJap
Technical Question On A340 Engines & Flight posted Fri Jan 13 2006 21:46:52 by Fergulmcc
Airbus A320 Electrical Failure Question. posted Mon Nov 28 2005 14:17:41 by TheBigOne
A320 Family Flaps Question posted Tue Nov 8 2005 18:04:15 by AM
Quick Question Re: A380 & 787 Carbon Fiber Content posted Mon Aug 15 2005 06:04:40 by 2H4
Tape On Windows & Doors, And Toilet Question posted Thu Apr 7 2005 01:47:39 by Sul
A320 PTU Question posted Wed Mar 30 2005 08:03:19 by HorizonGirl
A320 Hydraulic System Question posted Sun Feb 29 2004 11:37:32 by LMML 14/32
Pressurization & Bleed Air Question. posted Wed Aug 28 2002 15:18:49 by TOGA
B737-7-8-9 & A320-1 Question posted Fri Apr 15 2005 07:01:51 by TACAA320
A320 Width Question posted Wed Apr 4 2012 03:19:15 by Max Q
LH A320-family Question posted Fri Nov 25 2011 17:43:50 by Viscount724
B6 - A320 - ETOPS question posted Fri Nov 25 2011 14:11:18 by jbcontrails
A320 And 737-700 Question posted Wed Jan 27 2010 09:28:22 by MetJetCEO
Landing Gear Wheels & Tires Question posted Wed Sep 2 2009 12:32:07 by Propilot83
A320 & Boeing 737 Successor, Open Rotor? posted Thu Jul 16 2009 14:22:13 by Keesje
Question About A320 Series Wing posted Tue May 19 2009 19:20:41 by Teo747

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format