Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A340-600HGW As Beluga?  
User currently offlineAlessandro From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (5 years 6 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 7024 times:

With the low backlog of the A340-600 (only 20 airplanes) would Airbus agree to build a Beluga of the 75.3 meter long aircraft if asked?
The An-225 is 84 meters long and can carry 50 tonnes on its back, but I a bigger cargo hold could be possible I guess in the A340-600HGW?

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4675 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (5 years 6 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 7025 times:

Airbus studied this concept for transporting A380 parts, but in the end, it was shelved.

But what about a MegaBeluga BASED on the A380?  biggrin 



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineAlessandro From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (5 years 6 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 7019 times:

Hardly based on the A340-600HGW since the decision of how the A380 parts transport was decided already before that. A380-800 is shorter than the A340600HGW and the line is busy
something which the A340-600 isn´t with a backlog of 20 aircrafts.


User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4675 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (5 years 6 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 6872 times:



Quoting Alessandro (Reply 2):
Hardly based on the A340-600HGW since the decision of how the A380 parts transport was decided already before that.

Do have have to move into hair-splitting?



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineRheinwaldner From Switzerland, joined Jan 2008, 2197 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (5 years 6 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 6854 times:

IMO quite easy because all modules for a A346 Beluga exist. The A300 Beluga is built upon the same cross section that the A346 has. Thus you could take a A300 Beluga, apply the A346 wingbox, wings, gear, engines and stretch it as much as desired. The maximum length would be equal to the A346 but maybe the length of the A345 would be enough (and offer more payload).

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (5 years 6 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 6781 times:

...and carry what with it, a box of envelopes?

The things' payload density profile would be atrocious! As useless as the A345 may be, at least it could do a better job at such a task.


User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4675 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (5 years 6 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 6781 times:



Quoting Rheinwaldner (Reply 4):

The point for another Beluga would be a larger cross section, not additional payload or cargo bay length. IIRC the A346 Beluga would have featured an upper fuselage with a diameter of something like 11m!



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineEA772LR From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 2836 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (5 years 6 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 6659 times:



Quoting ConcordeBoy (Reply 5):
The things' payload density profile would be atrocious! As useless as the A345 may be, at least it could do a better job at such a task.

 checkmark  Unfortunately the A340NGs were built to structurally inefficient to be good freighters of any kind. The A346 Beluga would be cool as hell to see though!




We often judge others by their actions, but ourselves by our intentions.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic A340-600HGW As Beluga?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
A340 Lack Of Power - Is It True? posted Fri Oct 10 2008 11:30:14 by NEMA
When A Plane Pulls 4g What Weighs 4x As Much? posted Tue Oct 7 2008 22:37:21 by ThreeFourThree
A330 And A340 Exit Door 3 :Design posted Thu Oct 2 2008 15:39:03 by B773A346
A340 Landing Procedures posted Mon Sep 8 2008 23:43:14 by Speedbird741
Why Constant Upgrades For 777 & None For A340? posted Fri Aug 29 2008 17:00:29 by TriniA340
Cabin Air System As Infection Transport? posted Mon Aug 25 2008 16:58:26 by SashA
DL People - DL/AS #4456 posted Tue Aug 12 2008 09:11:11 by Frequentflykid
A340 Cargo Weight And Fuel Consumption Question posted Thu Jul 31 2008 15:12:29 by TheMirror
757 As A Heavy? posted Fri Jul 11 2008 14:33:39 by JoseKMLB
Contraindication For Working As Flight Dispatcher posted Thu Jun 5 2008 09:40:51 by Longitude

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format