Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Improvements On The Dreaded "Equipment Box"?  
User currently offlineSoxfan From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 870 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2951 times:

On planes with seatback TVs in coach, many passengers have complained that the accompanying equipment box, usually located under the seat, significantly restricts legroom. Does anyone know if there are plans to install systems which don't need the box in that location? Are there any systems like that available? Some planes have the box located only at the aisle seats, while others have the box under every seat. I know that each box basically holds everything needed for the TVs to work, but I'm wondering if there's another place that the box can be located to increase underseat storage (which be significant given that carry-ons are getting larger due to checked-baggage fees).

Thanks!

Soxfan  Smile


Pilot: "Request push, which way should we face?" JFK Ground: "You better face the front, sir, or you'll scare the pax!"
1 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineA10WARTHOG From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 325 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2844 times:

I would say maybe in the future, but not anytime soon. I work a lot on the Panasonic EX2 system which is a fairly new system, compare to others. The Seat electronic box or SEB is very thin in the coach seat. The SEB is basically a router. The brains for each seat are the monitor. The Seat power module or SPM is what is thick on the coach class seats.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Improvements On The Dreaded "Equipment Box"?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No Extra "cockpit" Windows On The Top Of A-380 posted Tue May 27 2008 04:10:37 by L1011CPH
Exhaust Mixers On JT4s: The First "Hushkits"? posted Tue Sep 11 2007 20:04:39 by Happy-flier
"leave 5000 On The Glidepath? posted Thu Jun 21 2007 05:11:15 by Dakotasport
"Ridges" On The Intakes Of Early JT9D's posted Sun Apr 8 2007 00:26:00 by N231YE
"descend On The Ils" Question posted Mon Sep 25 2006 21:42:28 by JulianUK
The Effects Of The 12 Vmc On A "normal" Light Twin posted Mon Feb 27 2006 15:08:07 by NorCal
"I Just Got A Windshear Warning On The System" posted Fri Dec 2 2005 18:55:23 by Julesmusician
Why No "Clarinet Look" On The 787? posted Wed Aug 31 2005 03:19:40 by Zippyjet
Concorde's "bulge" On The Vertical Fin Question posted Wed Sep 29 2004 15:19:57 by StudentFlyer
A Yellow "hole" On The 737 Wing posted Tue May 18 2004 23:31:59 by Tg 747-300

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format