Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
RNAV vs. GPS STAR  
User currently offlineYYZatcboy From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1083 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 10666 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT

I am probably very confused, but can anyone explain the difference between an RNAV STAR (Approach) and a GPS Star?


DHC1/3/4 MD11/88 L1011 A319/20/21/30 B727 735/6/7/8/9 762/3 E175/90 CRJ/700/705 CC150. J/S DH8D 736/7/8
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 1, posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 10661 times:

I will attempt to explain.

STAR is a Standard Terminal Arrival Route which gets arrival traffic into the terminal area from the enroute structure within the U.S. RNAV STARS are one of two types......either a STAR that requires all aircraft flying the route must be GPS as their navigation souce while the other allows for GPS equipped aircraft or other navigation sources such as DME/DME/IRU or similar area navigation capable aircraft. If DME/DME/IRU is allowed there will be certain critical NAVAIDS that must be operational in order for these aircraft to fly the arrival while a GPS equipped aircraft would not have that restriction.

There is no GPS named STAR, it would be named as an RNAV Arrival such as AGGEE RNAV Arrival to IAH or HONIE RNAV Arrival to ATL.

I hope this helped and didn't muddy the water.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineAAH732UAL From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 10650 times:

Quoting YYZatcboy (Thread starter):
I am probably very confused, but can anyone explain the difference between an RNAV STAR (Approach) and a GPS Star?

I think your basic understanding of the difference between a STAR and an Approach is the first thing that needs to be addressed and IAHFLYR did a pretty good job of that.

Now there are a few different types of RNAV approaches.
RNAV(GPS)(GNSS), RNAV(RNP), VOR/DME RNAV, GPS, and RNAV(DME/DME). Maybe you meant the RNAV(GPS) v. standalone GPS approach? If so here is the very basic info you need to know right now.......

RNAV(GPS) approaches are all RNP0.3 or GPS, DME/DME updating to RNP0.3 is not allowed hence (GPS). That also serves a purpose of letting pilots with just GPS units know they can shoot this approach (as long as the unit comply s with the proper TSO requirements). RNAV(GPS) approaches are basically redesigned stand alone GPS approaches that allow multi mode FMS systems (what you would find on a 777) along with GPS units to shoot these approaches.

Standalone GPS approaches were part of the original concept along with VOR/DME RNAV approaches. Only airplanes with a actual GPS unit can shot standalone GPS approaches. IE a 777 cannot shot GPS17 into KVCV. Its weird though that somehow this approach found its way into few UA airway manuals   

As we speak stand alone GPS approaches, along with VOR/DME RNAV approaches, are being converted to RNAV(GPS) at a very fast rate and all should be gone sometime soon.

[Edited 2009-01-06 20:20:34]

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic RNAV vs. GPS STAR
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rnav And GPS posted Thu Jul 19 2001 23:12:26 by Modesto2
RNAV/GPS Approaches In Europe? posted Tue Oct 30 2007 19:56:37 by Mir
Rnav Precision/implementation/GPS Use posted Tue Dec 13 2005 21:35:33 by Julesmusician
ATC Vectoring Vs Star Approaches posted Fri Mar 26 2004 15:29:12 by TOGA
GPS Vs Other IFR Approaches posted Sat Sep 30 2000 16:45:38 by AA737-800
Star Vs. Profile Descent posted Sun Jul 16 2000 03:05:41 by Modesto2
Noise Levels MD11 Vs. B777F posted Mon Dec 1 2008 13:39:58 by AKE0404AR
WN Has Very Few Acars Messages Vs Others posted Mon Dec 1 2008 08:13:33 by Rw774477
MD11 Vs 757 Which Has The Sharpest Climb? posted Sun Nov 23 2008 14:19:05 by 747400sp
Part 141 Vs. 142 posted Fri Nov 21 2008 21:32:34 by N6238P
NDB/VOR Vs GPS Approaches posted Wed May 17 2006 00:23:10 by Julianuk
Rnav And GPS posted Thu Jul 19 2001 23:12:26 by Modesto2
RNAV/GPS Approaches In Europe? posted Tue Oct 30 2007 19:56:37 by Mir
Rnav Precision/implementation/GPS Use posted Tue Dec 13 2005 21:35:33 by Julesmusician
ATC Vectoring Vs Star Approaches posted Fri Mar 26 2004 15:29:12 by TOGA
GPS Vs Other IFR Approaches posted Sat Sep 30 2000 16:45:38 by AA737-800
Star Vs. Profile Descent posted Sun Jul 16 2000 03:05:41 by Modesto2
Regular Descent Vs Steep Descent posted Sun May 6 2012 11:16:21 by aerotech777
B744 Vs B748 - Flight Deck Differences? posted Thu May 3 2012 06:51:42 by sevenheavy
A Twist On The A Vs B Argument posted Sun Apr 29 2012 10:53:08 by abnormal

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format