Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Gravel Deflectors & 737NG / Other Newer?  
User currently offlineRikkus67 From Canada, joined Jun 2000, 1577 posts, RR: 1
Posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 5774 times:

I noticed today a great close-up photograph posted of the 737-200 nose gear gravel deflector plate, and it got me to thinking:

Why wasn't the gravel deflector adopted to newer 737's, and is there ANY other (non 737-200)aircraft flying that uses this technology?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © A.Mahgoli




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Barry Shipley




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter Nowacki




AC.WA.CP.DL.RW.CO.WG.WJ.WN.KI.FL.SK.ACL.UA.US.F9
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24061 posts, RR: 23
Reply 1, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 5743 times:

The nosegear gravel deflector is part of a special gravel runway kit offered by Boeing on the 737-200 (most were 737-200C combis with main deck cargo door). That kit also included bleed air nozzles at the front of the engines to deflect debris that might otherwise be ingested into the engines, heavy duty brakes/tires, special Teflon coating on the lower fuselage/wings to reduce damage from flying stoes, and a retractable lower rotating beacon (retracted on takeoff/landing to prevent breakage by gravel).

There is no need for that equipment on aircraft that operate on paved runways. Several of those 732Cs with the gravel runway equipment still operate in northern Canada wherea some runways aren't paved. They also operate charters to mine sites etc. with gravel airstrips.

I doubt there was any demand for that kind of equipment on later 737 models. AS had that equipment on 732C combis (now retired) at one time, but I think they eventually removed it as they were no longer operating to any airports with unpaved runways.


User currently offline71Zulu From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3049 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 5741 times:



Quoting Rikkus67 (Thread starter):
Why wasn't the gravel deflector adopted to newer 737's, and is there ANY other (non 737-200)aircraft flying that uses this technology?

I guess the larger intakes of the CFMs used on the -300s and up would have made it hard to keep the debris out. Did the 727 offer some version of the gravel kit (obviously without the vortex generators)?

Here is some more info:

http://www.b737.org.uk/unpavedstripkit.htm



The good old days: Delta L-1011s at MSY
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31568 posts, RR: 57
Reply 3, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 5738 times:

This was only on the B732s due to the surface they operated on.

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 1):
Several of those 732Cs with the gravel runway equipment still operate in northern Canada wherea some runways aren't paved

Any reason in todays times,why the runways would not be paved,this will unnecessary reduce tire life.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offline71Zulu From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3049 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 5736 times:

Some of these operate to mines and oil fields where there is no paved runway and maybe will never be. Also some operate off of ice runways where you can still have debris and chunks of ice and snow getting to the engines.


The good old days: Delta L-1011s at MSY
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24061 posts, RR: 23
Reply 5, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 5736 times:



Quoting 71Zulu (Reply 2):
Did the 727 offer some version of the gravel kit (obviously without the vortex generators)?

Not sure what special equipment they may have had (can't recall anything like the nosegear deflector), but 727s have definitely operated off gravel runways. Photo below taken sometime in the 1970s of a 727-100C combi operated by former Canadian regional carrier Pacific Western (which merged with CP Air in 1987 to form Canadian Airlines) at Resolute Bay (YRB) in Canada's Arctic, 74 deg. N, 922 nm from the North Pole. YRB has a 6,500 ft. gravel runway.

http://www.pwareunion.com/images/Aircraft/B727-YRB.jpg


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24061 posts, RR: 23
Reply 6, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks ago) and read 5731 times:



Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 3):
Any reason in todays times,why the runways would not be paved,this will unnecessary reduce tire life.

I expect one reason is the huge temperature variations from summer to winter (e.g. from approximately +25C to -50C) which would make paved runways prone to cracking and a lot of maintenance. The few communities with scheduled service that still have unpaved runways are also very small (some with a population of just a few hundred) so there would also be a cost factor. Runways at larger towns in that area are paved.


User currently offlineMrChips From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 925 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 5686 times:



Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 6):
I expect one reason is the huge temperature variations from summer to winter (e.g. from approximately +25C to -50C) which would make paved runways prone to cracking and a lot of maintenance. The few communities with scheduled service that still have unpaved runways are also very small (some with a population of just a few hundred) so there would also be a cost factor. Runways at larger towns in that area are paved

Those are some good reasons, but the biggest reason why most runways in Northern Canada are unpaved is because of the permafrost. In case you're wondering what permafrost is, it's exactly what it sounds like - the soil (and even the underlying rock) is mixed with ice that never melts.

A paved runway will absorb a large amount of heat from the sun (even at these high latitudes), and in turn melt the permafrost underneath it, causing the runway to literally break apart after a few years. Of course, it is possible to build a paved runway that will not melt the permafrost, but it would be prohibitively expensive, even for a large center.



Time...to un-pimp...ze auto!
User currently offlineCanadianNorth From Canada, joined Aug 2002, 3387 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 5594 times:



Quoting MrChips (Reply 7):
but the biggest reason why most runways in Northern Canada are unpaved is because of the permafrost



Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 6):
The few communities with scheduled service that still have unpaved runways are also very small (some with a population of just a few hundred) so there would also be a cost factor.

Both are correct really. Permafrost is the big reason, but also there is the factor that for a community of only a few hundred that only has a couple flights per week, there's just not enough usage to justify the costs.

And as for the original question, I believe ground clearance issues with the CFM engines are the main reason for the gravel kit only being available on the 737-100/200. I could be wrong however.


CanadianNorth



What could possibly go wrong?
User currently offlineJAGflyer From Canada, joined Aug 2004, 3458 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 5566 times:

While we're discussing unpaved runways, Indian Airlines has special A320s with double bogie main gear (4 wheels on each gear instead of 2). I've heard the aircraft fly from unpaved or improperly maintained runways and therefore need this type of modified landing gear if they are going to be landing/taking off from there frequently with such a heavy aircraft.

Compare these two A320's landing gear:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Yuda




Support the beer and soda can industry, recycle old airplanes!
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24061 posts, RR: 23
Reply 10, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5480 times:



Quoting JAGflyer (Reply 9):
While we're discussing unpaved runways, Indian Airlines has special A320s with double bogie main gear (4 wheels on each gear instead of 2). I've heard the aircraft fly from unpaved or improperly maintained runways

That double-bogie gear was only on their early A320s. Later deliveries have the standard single-bogie gear. As I recall, the special gear wasn't for use on unpaved runways but on runways with a low bearing strength where the standard gear would risk damaging the surface. I assume the runways in question were upgraded, thus permitting use of the standard gear on their later A320s.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31568 posts, RR: 57
Reply 11, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 5434 times:



Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 6):
I expect one reason is the huge temperature variations from summer to winter (e.g. from approximately +25C to -50C) which would make paved runways prone to cracking and a lot of maintenance.

This is educational. Thanks.

Quoting JAGflyer (Reply 9):

While we're discussing unpaved runways, Indian Airlines has special A320s with double bogie main gear (4 wheels on each gear instead of 2). I've heard the aircraft fly from unpaved or improperly maintained runways and therefore need this type of modified landing gear if they are going to be landing/taking off from there frequently with such a heavy aircraft.



Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 10):
I assume the runways in question were upgraded, thus permitting use of the standard gear on their later A320s.

IC or rather now AI has all Twin Main wheels now.also the earlier LG service closed shop,forcing IC to go in for standard equipment as the situation on the runways were vastly improved.

regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineAlessandro From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 5181 times:

SAAB 340 got a gravelkit as well?
I wonder if a MD-11 could be gravelkitted and land with only the middle engine running or would that practice be too dangerous?


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Gravel Deflectors & 737NG / Other Newer?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Weight & Balance For Cessna 208 (or Other) posted Sun Oct 22 2006 11:18:26 by Flybyguy
737NG & CFM56 posted Thu Nov 2 2000 05:13:19 by Tarantine
Foreign Tower Communication In Other-than-English? posted Mon Nov 24 2008 15:57:55 by ConcordeBoy
B737 & A320 Replacement Engine (For New Aircraft) posted Fri Nov 21 2008 15:39:55 by Dkramer7
Pilot A.netter To Other A.netters-inflight posted Mon Nov 17 2008 01:07:00 by Deaphen
Retrofitting 737NG W. Flat Bulkhead posted Fri Nov 14 2008 06:31:39 by JustPlaneNutz
Smoke Detectors On Planes - When & Where posted Wed Nov 12 2008 09:59:46 by B777Neuss
Work On Cdccl & ALI Items posted Sat Nov 1 2008 11:29:57 by HAWK21M
Weights & Balances EMB 145 posted Wed Oct 29 2008 18:10:55 by Adools
Boeing Greys?why One, Not The Other? posted Thu Oct 23 2008 11:09:20 by Soon7x7

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format