Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Any Curved Dgps Appoarches?  
User currently offlineTsra From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 214 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2484 times:

I know the FAA was looking into curved flight path differential GPS approaches as apposed to a straight in approach. Is there any approved curved DGPS approaches out there? I am interested because an airport I fly out of could use this method. Right now the longest northern runway at this airport can not have an ILS approach because of terrain and towers.

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 1, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2441 times:



Quoting Tsra (Thread starter):
. Is there any approved curved DGPS approaches out there?

Take a look at Naverus's case study for Brisbane:
http://www.naverus.com/Case_Studies/...nd_the_Environment_in_Brisbane.htm

Tom.


User currently offlineTsra From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 214 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2319 times:



Quoting Tdscanuck (Reply 1):
Tom.


Good info, Thanks Tom


User currently offlineDescendVia From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2235 times:

Quoting Tsra (Thread starter):

Actually they are not "GPS" approaches though GPS is a requirement for them. They are RNAV(RNP) approaches that require a SAAAR (Special Aircraft and Aircrew Requirement) or if its an ICAO approach an AR (Authorization Required).

Thing is that some planes can meet the low RNP requirements (Smith/GE FMCs and Pegasus (Honeywell) FMCs) yet not a lot of airlines are investing in this. IMO in a few years more and more airlines will be investing in this but it will only be airlines. GA will just stick to WAAS GPS approaches. AFAIK, there was only one (RNP) approved GA jet and it was sorta by default as it was (still is?) the Gulfstream V Honeywell FMS test plane.

I'm personally surprised that NACO/FAA actually publish these approaches and have them open to the general public and actually two (RNP) approaches that CO developed for 29 at EWR where just published by NACO as well. IMHO, its just a waste (even though I don't use NACO charts) since NO ONE is RNP approach approved and the people who are use higher quality products like Jeppesen or just have Jeppesen produce company charts.

So the long to short is..... if your airport would even get an (RNP) approach, you would not be able to fly it unless your company (if that is your case) supped up the plane(s) and made them comply w/ AC 90-101 which would more then likely not be cost effective since the number of RNP approaches you would actually do would be close to 0. Heck most airlines that (RNP) approach approved, besides AS, Air China, and QF only fly the approaches in the sim every 6 or so months.

In conclusion, its going to take many more years of the HAR to actually see these approaches common place in the states. Australia on the other hand has really embraced these approaches though, so who knows. I got a feeling if the WN (RNP) conversion is a success after 2012, or whenever, more airlines might look at this stuff with more of an open mind.

If you want to see some approaches look at: (RF= Radius-to Fix)
KLGB (RF)
KDCA (RF)
KPSP (RF)
KJFK (RF)
KEWR (RF)
KTUS (RF)
KONT
KJAC

Don't get me wrong, I really dig PBN (performance based navigation) stuff like this but unfortunately I'm also a realist  
[Edited 2009-04-08 14:33:35]

User currently offlineDescendVia From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2234 times:



Quoting DescendVia (Reply 3):

Just to add........

Google AC 90-101, its some pretty good reading and really does not have much of the MATH crap that TERPS/Naverus use to design the approaches.


User currently offlineTsra From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 214 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 2146 times:



Quoting DescendVia (Reply 3):

More good info thanks Descend!


User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 6, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2086 times:



Quoting DescendVia (Reply 3):
since NO ONE is RNP approach approved

Define "no one"?

There are operators who have applied for RNP approval and airlines that are already flying RNAV (RNP) SAAAR approaches.

Most large airports with parallel runways that meet the criteria for simultaneous ILS approaches can't use RNAV approaches in a simultaneous operation due to the 7110.65 criteria. The separation criteria needs to ramp up quickly (good luck on that) as well as a change to the controller handbook so RNAV (GPS) or RNAV (RNP) can be flown using the same lateral and vertical track as the ILS otherwise they will not be used as DescendVia mentions.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineDescendVia From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2041 times:



Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 6):

Define "no one"?

That was in reference to people who would be using NACO charts and why they actually publish them for the general public.

AFAIK these airlines are (RNP) approach approved:
CO (all except for the non-NG 737s)
QF (737NG)
DL (Peg 757s)
CA (Peg 757 and A320)
NZ (737 and A320)
AS
Plus a few others I'm probably missing and my point is that all of the above use Jeppesen charts or the similar. Even the Honeywell Gulfstream V uses Jeppesen as part of the EFB in there.

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 6):
change to the controller handbook so RNAV (GPS) or RNAV (RNP) can be flown using the same lateral and vertical track as the ILS otherwise

That "could" work for RNAV(GPS) approaches that have the small final approach course and I know of a few controllers that just use the ILS for vectors to final (though not legal). Other then that I mean most (RNP) approaches have to be flown in full from an IAF or IF where radar is required to join it (KGYY) taking even more time, though some straight in ones like CVG and ATL can be vectors but again, the ILS would be flown since they can do a lot more stuff with the ILS as you know/pointed out.

The WN conversion should be real interesting to see.......


User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 8, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2032 times:



Quoting DescendVia (Reply 7):
That "could" work for RNAV(GPS) approaches that have the small final approach course and I know of a few controllers that just use the ILS for vectors to final (though not legal).

Not to sound ignornant, but I'm not sure what a "small final approach course" means!

Quoting DescendVia (Reply 7):
though some straight in ones like CVG and ATL can be vectors but again

IAH has used RNAV approaches for years with CO having S, all have been vectors to final exactly like the ILS as they mirror the ILS.

Quoting DescendVia (Reply 7):
the ILS would be flown since they can do a lot more stuff with the ILS

Until the time that the ILS is out of service for some reason and then you are certainly glad to have the ability to use the RNAV's.

Back to the topic, curved RNAV (RNP) approaches are sure slick sounding however, I would bet the required criteria will run into many roadblocks.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineDescendVia From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2029 times:



Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 8):
"small final approach course"

My bad, I meant same final approach course.......


User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 10, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1993 times:



Quoting DescendVia (Reply 9):
My bad, I meant same final approach course

I wake up confused so please don't help me along!  Smile



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineDescendVia From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1979 times:



Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 10):

 Smile
I actually think I had a brain fart.... I swore I typed "same" and proof read "same".


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Any Curved Dgps Appoarches?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airline RES Systems: Any Reason To Have Multiple? posted Fri Nov 7 2008 14:56:47 by Sankaps
Idea To Survive Any Plane Crash posted Wed Sep 17 2008 09:51:02 by KSBD
Any Danger At Running Props Full Power? posted Tue Sep 2 2008 19:47:36 by Triebwerk
Any Runways Made Of Brick? posted Fri Jun 27 2008 14:14:47 by SirDeath
Is There Any Rules For Take Off... posted Sun Jun 22 2008 21:40:53 by Airbalticfan
Any Alaska Airlines Pilots On Here? posted Sun May 25 2008 17:13:14 by AAH732UAL
Is There Any Available Cost Breakdown posted Sun May 11 2008 05:56:26 by Placekicker
Some Technical Questions, Any Help Appreciated posted Wed Apr 23 2008 12:17:28 by Speedbird001
Q-400.... Any Good At High Altitude Arpts? posted Wed Apr 23 2008 05:21:51 by NwaLAS
Early 737s Vs NG - Are Any Parts Still The Same? posted Mon Mar 24 2008 17:22:36 by Viscount724

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format