Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ER Vs Etops  
User currently offlineZebfly2 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 416 posts, RR: 1
Posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2681 times:

I understand that some twins are certified ETOPS due to modfications to the aircraft but what is the difference between a aircraft such as a 767ER or 757ER and one that is ETOPS certified? Do they have the same capabilities such as range,avonics,MTOW? If so, why not classify all big twins as ETOPS? Do they come from the assembly line rated ETOPS or are the modifications made after delivery? It is to my understanding that the 767-400 is the only aircraft classified 'out the box' by the FAA as ER and that the airlines are the ones who classify their aircraft as ER's. I hope that I'm making sense. Please explain. Thanks. ?:-l


Educate your children before others mis-educate them!!!
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineB767-400er From Hong Kong, joined Apr 2000, 290 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2652 times:

The designation ER simply means Extended Range. It's a Code used by Boeing and other manufacturers, it is not issued by the FAA. ETOPS, however, is a standard set by the FAA.

There are not many differences between a Etops and a non-Etops twin. However, there are minor equ. requirements such as more life jackets, etc.

Etops is actually more of an Airline rating, not so much the plane's. Even the Airbus 32X family are certified for 120min ETOPS. Etops requires the airline to have stricter(sp?) rules on the aircraft's maintance, one good example is that a mech. will only replace an oil filter on one engine, while another mech. will replace the other's. This elimates the chance the the mech can do the wrong thing twice, therefore leaving a twin engine-less.

Boeing 777's are 180min out-of-the-box, and there are rumors that the recently launched LRs will be 207min -out-of-the-box, which currently, is only granted on a case-by-case basis, and only with the right airline/plane/engine combo.

Hope I got it right,

Tony,
B767-400er



User currently offlineZebfly2 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 416 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2623 times:

Thanks for the info.I guess it's more of a matter of expenses as to why airlines don't adhere to the stricter rules for ETOPS.


Educate your children before others mis-educate them!!!
User currently offlineGt1 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 133 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2613 times:

There are other more important differences than just life jackets. Some differences between a 767ER a
non-ER 767 would be:

FAA required:
Hydraulic Motor Generator (HMG)
195 Minute cargo fire suppression (vs 60 Min.)
APU start capability up to FL350


Boeing added:
Higher Gross Weight
More fuel capacity
Fuel Jettison system
A CDU with Stand-by navigation capabilities
Up-rated engines
Different backup power wiring for the IRU's and EFIS

Usually to fly ETOPS you need an ER, or at least the FAA required mods.

To summerize: Boeing builds ER's while airlines fly with an FAA approved ETOPS program.





Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic ER Vs Etops
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
ETOPS: Time Vs Distance posted Mon Oct 15 2001 05:09:58 by Timz
JAR Vs FAA posted Wed Mar 21 2007 05:09:16 by Newagebird
Wing-loading Vs Ride & Turbulence posted Fri Mar 9 2007 11:43:26 by Redcordes
Crosswind Crab Landing VS Lowering One Wing? posted Thu Mar 8 2007 00:15:34 by SSTsomeday
Bird Vs. 767 Flap Fairing posted Mon Feb 26 2007 12:08:40 by Miamiair
Packs - Norm Vs. A/B posted Tue Feb 20 2007 06:38:25 by Futterman
Scrapping Vs D Check posted Thu Feb 15 2007 22:37:41 by Xbraniffone
US Ramtaf Vs. NWS Forecast posted Sat Feb 3 2007 03:53:29 by Allstarflyer
A343 VS MD11ER posted Fri Jan 26 2007 08:35:28 by Asianguy767
Nose Down Vs Nose Up Approaches posted Thu Jan 18 2007 07:22:19 by Aaden

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format