Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Photo: NW Seats On EA DC-7?  
User currently offlineSeptember11 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3623 posts, RR: 21
Posted (4 years 6 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 7649 times:

Please take a look at picture below. A cabin view of Eastern DC-7 at a museum.. Did these seats come from Northwest?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dan Brownlee




Airliners.net of the Future
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline411A From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1826 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (4 years 6 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 7610 times:

Hard to tell, however, they don't look like the standard Weber seats that were fitted to many DC-7's that I flew (as a First Officer) , long ago.
In addition, that certainly is not a standard Douglas passenger cabin arrangement , for example, no hat racks.
Looks more like a freighter interior that was devised later on to be a quick-change arrangement, IE, for passenger use at times, freighter otherwise.
I flew a DC-7CF that had this particular arrangement, long ago.


User currently offlineGeorgiaAME From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 985 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (4 years 6 months 1 day ago) and read 7259 times:

In 1961, I flew NW Detroit to Portland via Spokane. The aircraft was significantly wider than the DC-6 we flew from Newark to Pittsburgh to Detroit. Seating was 3-2 in economy. That would be my last flight until 1969, when I flew an El Al B-707, non stop JFK to Tel Aviv, then the longest commercial non stop world wide. Or so we were told. That was a very spacious 3-3 arrangement. My has travel evolved!


"Trust, but verify!" An old Russian proverb, quoted often by a modern American hero
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25626 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (4 years 6 months 16 hours ago) and read 7192 times:

Quoting 411A (Reply 1):
Looks more like a freighter interior that was devised later on to be a quick-change arrangement, IE, for passenger use at times, freighter otherwise.
Quoting GeorgiaAME (Reply 2):
In 1961, I flew NW Detroit to Portland via Spokane. The aircraft was significantly wider than the DC-6 we flew from Newark to Pittsburgh to Detroit.

If you're referring to the DC-7, the cabin width was exactly the same as the DC-6 (and DC-4).


User currently offlineKingAir200 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 1622 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (4 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 7067 times:

Quoting September11 (Thread starter):
Did these seats come from Northwest?

They definitely look like it. The seat covers are the same pattern that NW used for years.



Hey Swifty
User currently offlinesrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 6791 times:

Quoting 411A (Reply 1):
In addition, that certainly is not a standard Douglas passenger cabin arrangement , for example, no hat racks.
Looks more like a freighter interior that was devised later on to be a quick-change arrangement, IE, for passenger use at times, freighter otherwise.

The a/c in question was never converted into a freighter, as after leaving the Eastern fleet, it operated for a few years with some travel clubs before being parked for 30 years at STP. Here's an interior shot of it prior to being restored:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ralph M. Pettersen



Here's some earlier work on the restoration:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ralph M. Pettersen



User currently offlinesparky35805 From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 287 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 6569 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

That aircraft never operated in first class configuration with Eastern.It was delivered in 90 seat Falcon Super Coach configuration.The last 20 of a 50 aircraft order were Falcon Super Coaches.
Sparky


User currently offlineLonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 5051 posts, RR: 43
Reply 7, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 6500 times:

Quoting sparky35805 (Reply 6):
That aircraft never operated in first class configuration with Eastern.It was delivered in 90 seat Falcon Super Coach configuration



That would make sense, as the interior picture in reply 5 above, shows an Eastern Air Lines interior of the mid 1950s. The seat and curtain fabrics were the ones used in their aircraft at the time ... DC-6, L1049, DC-7, in fact the L188 when delivered was equipped the same.

What I find curious, is that the restorers were presented with what could be considered the hardest to find when restoring an airliner interior ... namely the wall panels, the overhead racks and the passenger service units. That being the case then, why were none used in restoration? The new wall panels look like they were machined to fit, ignoring overhead racks all together. While it didn't look like a freighter when they started, it sure does when they finished!

I recall when the fate of the exTCA L1049G on the north end of Toronto was in the balance. A lot of potential new owners were not looking at the airframe or engines, they looked at the interior and could not believe their luck when they saw ... wall panels, overhead racks, window frames, PSUs, galley units, lavatory fittings, etc etc etc .. THAT is the hardest to find!

With regard to the seats. I would imagine the old 1950s seats shown above would not be legal for carrying passengers any more.



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineTZTriStar500 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1453 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 6470 times:

Quoting Longhauler (Reply 7):
That would make sense, as the interior picture in reply 5 above, shows an Eastern Air Lines interior of the mid 1950s. The seat and curtain fabrics were the ones used in their aircraft at the time ... DC-6, L1049, DC-7, in fact the L188 when delivered was equipped the same.

What I find curious, is that the restorers were presented with what could be considered the hardest to find when restoring an airliner interior ... namely the wall panels, the overhead racks and the passenger service units. That being the case then, why were none used in restoration? The new wall panels look like they were machined to fit, ignoring overhead racks all together. While it didn't look like a freighter when they started, it sure does when they finished!

I recall when the fate of the exTCA L1049G on the north end of Toronto was in the balance. A lot of potential new owners were not looking at the airframe or engines, they looked at the interior and could not believe their luck when they saw ... wall panels, overhead racks, window frames, PSUs, galley units, lavatory fittings, etc etc etc .. THAT is the hardest to find!

With regard to the seats. I would imagine the old 1950s seats shown above would not be legal for carrying passengers any more.

This aircraft is owned by the Historical Flight Foundation http://www.historicalflightfoundation.com/ and is to be operated as a Part 125 travel club which will allow members to fly on it. While the 'purest' in me would love to have seen the original interior used and restored, it was simply too expensive and/or not technically feasible and still allow carriage of passengers.

In order to allow passenger carriage, some of the current regulations must be met along with some exemptions and the original interior (seats, overhead racks, and lavatories) did not meet them or required very expensive overhaul. I had heard the cost to restore the original seats would have been very expensive and require new fabric and cushions that meet current flammability standards (a cost that cannot be borne by the foundation at this time). While not the most authentic, the quickest way was to re-use some ex-NW DC-9 doubles in place of the originals and install a new interior liner without the racks. The aircraft also uses two ex-NW DC-9 lavs in place of the originals.

It comes down to would one rather see N836D restored completely authentic and grounded as a museum piece or compromise a bit and get a chance to fly on a DC-7B in 2010 and beyond up in the air where she belongs? I think most on here would choose the latter.

I edited this to add that they have kept all of the original seats and furnishings so that they can be re-installed at a later date and certainly some day when she becomes a permanently grounded museum piece.

[Edited 2010-05-13 09:32:37]


35 years of American Trans Air/ATA Airlines, 1973-2008. A great little airline that will not be soon forgotten.
User currently offlineLonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 5051 posts, RR: 43
Reply 9, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 6455 times:

Quoting TZTriStar500 (Reply 8):
It comes down to would one rather see N836D restored completely authentic and grounded as a museum piece or compromise a bit and get a chance to fly on a DC-7B in 2010 and beyond up in the air where she belongs? I think most on here would choose the latter.



I don't disagree for a second. And as I have had the opportunity to fly on an L749A, L1049H, DC-4 and a DC-6B, in the last 10 or so years, I wholeheartedly agree with the decision process. I am glad to hear the original interior has been saved for possible use.

Just out of curiosity ... while I can certainly see that the seats/seat covers would no longer be legal, what was the issue with the original wall panels and overhead racks?



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineTZTriStar500 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1453 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 6435 times:

Quoting Longhauler (Reply 9):
Just out of curiosity ... while I can certainly see that the seats/seat covers would no longer be legal, what was the issue with the original wall panels and overhead racks?

That I do not have complete answers to this, but I would guess they were in bad shape requiring extensive refurbishment and then covering in current flammability standard materials. This can be very expensive if burn testing has to be done.



35 years of American Trans Air/ATA Airlines, 1973-2008. A great little airline that will not be soon forgotten.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Photo: NW Seats On EA DC-7?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Blocking Off Seats On Ryanair posted Fri Jun 24 2005 23:41:37 by Braybuddy
Foldable Seats On Airliners. posted Sat Jun 18 2005 18:59:58 by HAWK21M
What's This Little Door On The DC-10? posted Mon May 2 2005 01:11:49 by Starlionblue
Open Panel On The Port Side On The DC-10 posted Wed Jan 12 2005 17:00:13 by Alphafloor
Max. Seats On Airbus A310? posted Sat Dec 11 2004 02:50:34 by Debonair
"Slots" On The DC-8 posted Sat May 17 2003 17:08:07 by MASB747
Tech Question On The DC-8 posted Thu Jun 13 2002 07:31:48 by Vertigo
Photo Of DC-9 Fuel Spill posted Tue Mar 2 2010 11:17:53 by September11
Intake On The Side Of DC-8s Noses? posted Mon Mar 1 2010 12:31:20 by 747400sp
If The No. 2 Engine On A DC-10 Fires Up... posted Tue Nov 11 2008 21:08:20 by Triebwerk

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format