Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing 787 Withstands First Lightning Strike  
User currently offlineNoWorries From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 539 posts, RR: 1
Posted (4 years 4 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 5651 times:

It shouldn't come as any surprise, but the 787 survived its first strike ...

http://www.businessweek.com/news/201...tning-strike-as-tests-advance.html

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2155 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (4 years 4 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 5625 times:

It really depends on where the lighting hit. I mean, if it hit the engine naccelle, the empenage, the radome, trailing surfaces, then the reaction wouldn't be any different than it would if the lightning hit a 777 because the construction of those items are the same (or almost the same).

It will be interesting to follow this development. I'm just tagging this to better track this discussion.

bikerthai



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
User currently offlineBlatantEcho From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1916 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (4 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 5255 times:

It's going to get struck by lightning all the time in service, of course it's going to do fine.

Sure, it's super top secret carbon-fiber....but you think this didn't get planned for?



They're not handing trophies out today
User currently offlineNoWorries From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 539 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (4 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 5131 times:

I am a little curious -- the article mentions that there were no signs of any damage. When an inspection is performed after a strike, how often are there no signs of damage vs. signs of some damage vs. serious damage. Would it be safe to say that most of the time there is little or no damage? Many modern planes have at least some parts made of composite -- is the incidence of damage for those parts comparable to more traditional material?

[Edited 2010-06-18 04:20:37]

User currently offlineSEPilot From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 6959 posts, RR: 46
Reply 4, posted (4 years 4 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 4885 times:

I certainly find this encouraging-this was the biggest worry I had about the 787, even though I had confidence that the Boeing engineers had adequately provided for it. I had no fear that lightning would actually bring the plane down, but I was concerned that it might burn out some of the wire mesh embedded in the composite, which would be a very expensive thing to repair. But it is very good news to me that it actually encountered lightning and survived unscathed.


The problem with making things foolproof is that fools are so doggone ingenious...Dan Keebler
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31684 posts, RR: 56
Reply 5, posted (4 years 4 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 4840 times:

Quoting NoWorries (Reply 3):
the article mentions that there were no signs of any damage

Thats odd,shouldn't there be an Entry & Exit point post lightening strike.
regds
MEL.



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlinePlanenutok From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 4 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 4804 times:

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 5):
Quoting NoWorries (Reply 3):
the article mentions that there were no signs of any damage

Thats odd,shouldn't there be an Entry & Exit point post lightening strike.
regds
MEL.

Every lightening strike that I have worked has had damage to some extend if it was actually hit. The damage varies from discolored paint at entry or exit, to holes in the airframe and blown off static wicks. Now a suspected lightening strike on the other hand may or may not have actually hit the airframe but the crews will still write up a strike if they see a bright flash close by. That's my 2 cents.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31684 posts, RR: 56
Reply 7, posted (4 years 4 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 4496 times:

Quoting Planenutok (Reply 6):
but the crews will still write up a strike if they see a bright flash close by

Flash visible closeby in Flight would mean a high chance that the Aircraft in question has encountered lightening strike.So there would have to be an Entry & exit point.
regds
MEL.



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineMrSkyGuy From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 1214 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (4 years 4 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 4351 times:

One would imagine this is tested extensively on the ground in controlled lightning generation facilities, no? I'd imagine the effects of a lightning discharge on these materials would be well known and documented, leaving the airborne proving runs for the FAA's requirements.


"The strength of the turbulence is directly proportional to the temperature of your coffee." -- Gunter's 2nd Law of Air
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 9, posted (4 years 4 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 4280 times:

Quoting MrSkyGuy (Reply 8):
One would imagine this is tested extensively on the ground in controlled lightning generation facilities, no?

They are. Which is why it's so hilarious to watch so many people think this is some kind of huge unknown risk.

Quoting MrSkyGuy (Reply 8):
I'd imagine the effects of a lightning discharge on these materials would be well known and documented

They are. Have been for more than 25 years.

Quoting MrSkyGuy (Reply 8):
leaving the airborne proving runs for the FAA's requirements.

You don't have to prove lightning strike capability by flight test (that would be a stupid way to "prove" it anyway)...you never intentionally get the plane hit by lightning for commercial certification.

Tom.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Boeing 787 Withstands First Lightning Strike
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing 787 Strobe/Beacon Lights posted Tue Dec 15 2009 22:32:56 by Propilot83
Leahy: Boeing 787 Single Barrels "A Bridge To Far" posted Wed Nov 4 2009 00:52:06 by Keesje
Boeing 787 Dreamliner Cabin, How Silent / Noisy? posted Wed Feb 4 2009 04:34:43 by Keesje
What Happens During A Lightning Strike posted Thu Jun 19 2008 20:03:16 by SPR773
LH 737 Lightning Strike posted Fri Apr 11 2008 09:18:52 by 744lover
Post-Lightning Strike Inspection posted Thu Apr 10 2008 23:12:12 by Greg3322
US FAA To Impose Special Conditions On Boeing 787 posted Thu Feb 28 2008 01:36:31 by Parapente
Boeing 787 Composite Materials Questions posted Mon Dec 3 2007 21:27:12 by Sovietjet
DA 20 And Lightning Strike posted Fri Aug 24 2007 02:19:22 by Tuhlhorn
Boeing 787 Bolted Structural Repairs posted Thu Mar 15 2007 17:48:42 by Rheinbote

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format