Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airplane Length And Width Relation  
User currently offlinepanais From Cyprus, joined May 2008, 461 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 5782 times:

There have been a number of discussions on a plane's width and its suitability to a market. For example, some A.neters say that the CS300 is a better plane than the A319/B737-700 because it has a smaller width and therefore, less drag that its competitors, even if it is longer that them.

Also, you have the A340-600 which is longer and narrower than the B777, but it did not fare well because among other things it was heavier.

The question is how long can a manufacturer go with a certain width before it is too long.

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinerwessel From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2310 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 5679 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I don't think there's a hard-and-fast rule, but longer is definitely worse from a structural perspective, while wider is worse from an aerodynamic perspective.

It's a bit interesting to note that two of the "longest" airliners, the MD-82 and the A346 have similar fuselage length to width ratios, a bit over 13:1. The 773 is about 11% shorter on a width basis than the A346.

The construction matters too - I think many people are expecting CFRP, which is much stiffer, to make longer tubes more practical.


User currently offlinedw747400 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 1257 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 5643 times:

Quoting rwessel (Reply 1):
I don't think there's a hard-and-fast rule, but longer is definitely worse from a structural perspective, while wider is worse from an aerodynamic perspective.

The structure/aerodynamics are definitely the biggest factors, but you also have operational considerations. Increased turning radius, needing a larger parking area, and of course increased turnaround times.

On the positive side, provisioning and servicing the airplane may be easier--on a short, fat aircraft (the A380 as a double decker is a prime example) your personnel and equipment are all competing for a limited amount of plane-side space.



CFI--Certfied Freakin Idiot
User currently offlinepanais From Cyprus, joined May 2008, 461 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 5594 times:

Quoting rwessel (Reply 1):
The construction matters too - I think many people are expecting CFRP, which is much stiffer, to make longer tubes more practical.



Interesting point there.

I did a check on two of Airbus's aircraft, the A321 and the A333, both fuel efficient in their category, carry a lot of passengers, medium range and the fuselage length to width ratio was 11.27 and 11.28 respectively.

The other Airbus aircraft that comes very close to this with 11.22 is the A350-900 which is meant to be fuel efficient, carry a lot of passengers but long range.

There seems to be an valid point on the use of the CFRP panels.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Airplane Length And Width Relation
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
IAS, GS, And TAS Relation posted Sat Jun 16 2007 01:26:48 by ANITIX87
BHX Runway Length And Transatlantic 767's? posted Wed May 9 2007 14:26:28 by Dazbo5
Runway Length And Boeing/Airbus FMS Warning posted Sat Dec 24 2005 01:01:22 by Julesmusician
Heat And Takeoff Relation posted Fri Aug 10 2001 09:00:31 by Alee
Buying And Owning An Entry-Level GA Airplane posted Tue Nov 18 2008 20:52:42 by 2H4
MIN Runway Length Required For A330 And 777? posted Sat Sep 3 2005 00:22:08 by EI321
A319LR: Mtow And Runway Length posted Sat Aug 7 2004 11:57:16 by Eg777er
Difference Of Length Btween B707-138B And B720B posted Sun Sep 28 2003 17:24:43 by Dennys
DC-10: The Relation Between Ailerons And Gear posted Thu Nov 14 2002 15:23:48 by LMML 14/32
Autobrakes And Runway Length Question posted Wed Oct 16 2002 08:52:08 by Tsentsan

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format