Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Question About Sonic Boom  
User currently offlinehenpol747 From Mexico, joined Jun 2001, 588 posts, RR: 1
Posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 7447 times:

Hi there,

Can the sonic boom caused by reaching Mach I be heard inside the aircraft reaching that speed?

Thanks


Vive la France! ¡Viva México!
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinesw733 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6371 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 7411 times:

No. The reason being that a sonic boom is a result of air compression, and when you are flying at the speed of sound, the air is also traveling along with you...as that air compresses behind the aircraft, the noise is created.

That can sound kind of confusing, but I found a good analogy. Say you are on a boat cruising along...you are creating wake, but you don't feel it, but those around and behind you do as the wake travels away from you.

Re-reading this, I have done a terrible, terrible job explaining...but in short, NO, you do not hear a sonic boom if you are on an aircraft creating one.


User currently offlineKiwiinOz From New Zealand, joined Oct 2005, 2165 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 7376 times:

I always thought this:

At the point when a sonic boom is created, the vessel upon which you are travelling is now travelling faster than the speed of sound. This being the case, the sound of the sonic boom is not heard as the sound wave cannot "catch up" with the aircraft. Presumably, if the aircraft were to slow considerably immediately after the boom was created, it would be possible


User currently offlineFly2HMO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 7370 times:

Just look up on the hundreds of videos of aircraft going supersonic shot from the interior, be it fighters or concorde. There is really no discernible noise difference.

User currently offlinenoise From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 1855 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 7350 times:

sw733 explained it correctly.

User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10332 posts, RR: 26
Reply 5, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 7295 times:

Quoting KiwiinOz (Reply 2):
At the point when a sonic boom is created, the vessel upon which you are travelling is now travelling faster than the speed of sound. This being the case, the sound of the sonic boom is not heard as the sound wave cannot "catch up" with the aircraft. Presumably, if the aircraft were to slow considerably immediately after the boom was created, it would be possible

While the individual soundwaves are out-paced by the aircraft, the actual sonic boom (the near-instantaneous shock caused by the buildup of pressure waves) travels just as fast as the aircraft, no matter how fast it's going.

Quoting noise (Reply 4):
sw733 explained it correctly.

Sort of. If you have a bow shock, or a shock over the wings, or whatever, that shock starts right at the aircraft skin (or ahead of the aircraft, as may be the case with a more blunt-nosed aircraft). So you can't really say the shock is behind the aircraft, as it starts right over the aircraft at some point.

Same with a boat's wake - there's usually a large bow wave, which, for the first couple seconds, isn't actually behind the boat.

The most basic reason you can't hear a sonic boom inside the plane is simply because there is no shockwave inside the plane. There's no supersonic airflow in the airplane cabin. And since the the shockwave itself is the sound, if the shock doesn't pass over you, you don't hear it.

Quoting henpol747 (Thread starter):
Can the sonic boom caused by reaching Mach I be heard inside the aircraft reaching that speed?

And just to possibly clarify (not sure how you've learned this), the sonic boom starts once the aircraft reaches Mach 1, and stays with the aircraft until it drops below Mach 1 again. It's not an instantaneous thing - it just seems that way on the ground because it is moving at the speed of the aircraft.



How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 6, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 7292 times:

Quoting henpol747 (Thread starter):
Can the sonic boom caused by reaching Mach I be heard inside the aircraft reaching that speed?

No.

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 5):
if the shock doesn't pass over you, you don't hear it.

This is the key...if you're on the aircraft, you're moving with the shockwave. So there is no pressure *change* for you, and it's the change that we hear as sound. If you're on the ground (or moving relative to the aircraft), the shock passes over you and you hear the boom.

Tom.


User currently offlineThirtyEcho From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 1659 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 7225 times:

If you go faster than a Police car chasing you can the Police car catch up to you? No.

If you go faster than the speed of sound can a sound from behind catch up to you? No.

If you go faster than the speed of light can you see your face in a mirror? No.


User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 8, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 7131 times:

Quoting ThirtyEcho (Reply 7):
If you go faster than the speed of sound can a sound from behind catch up to you? No.

Although that's true, it's not a factor in why you can't hear the boom when you're onboard. The first shockwave starts at the nose (or slightly ahead), and as long as you're inside the mach cone (which the airplane is), pressure disturbances from the shock wave reach the aircraft. The reason you don't hear anything is that the pressure's not changing for you.

Tom.


User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10332 posts, RR: 26
Reply 9, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 7107 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 8):

Not to mention (far as I remember), if you're somehow moving at Mach 2 on the ground, and an airplane passes over you at Mach 4, you certainly will hear the boom, as the sonic boom itself moves at the speed of the airplane creating it.

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 8):
and as long as you're inside the mach cone (which the airplane is), pressure disturbances from the shock wave reach the aircraft.

Did you mean to say "pressure disturbances from the shock wave don't reach the aircraft"?



How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 10, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 7023 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 9):
Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 8):
and as long as you're inside the mach cone (which the airplane is), pressure disturbances from the shock wave reach the aircraft.

Did you mean to say "pressure disturbances from the shock wave don't reach the aircraft"?

No, I meant "do". Pressure disturbances from a supersonic source (like the shockwave) still propagate outwards at Mach 1. If you propagate backwards from the bow shock origination point (the nose), you get to the aircraft. If this weren't true, you wouldn't have any wind noise at all when you fly supersonic, and that's obviously not true.

Tom.


User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10332 posts, RR: 26
Reply 11, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 6983 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 10):

Ohhh, gotcha, I clearly didn't grasp what you meant.

Sorry about that!  



How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
User currently offlineMaverick623 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 5732 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (4 years 5 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 6910 times:

Quoting sw733 (Reply 1):
Say you are on a boat cruising along...you are creating wake, but you don't feel it, but those around and behind you do as the wake travels away from you.

This is the most correct analogy, because a supersonic shock wave and a boat wake are exactly the same type of shock wave, formed in nearly the same way.

Quoting ThirtyEcho (Reply 7):
If you go faster than the speed of light can you see your face in a mirror? No.

Completely different set of rules. Suffice it to say that, if indeed you did travel faster than light (or even if the mirror did), you would still see your reflection, just passing in the opposite direction. And extremely distorted. If you're holding the mirror, nothing would look out of place, because the speed of light is the same relative to any particular frame of reference.



"PHX is Phoenix, PDX is the other city" -777Way
User currently offlineMingToo From Zimbabwe, joined Jun 2009, 464 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (4 years 5 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 6726 times:

Quoting ThirtyEcho (Reply 7):
If you go faster than a Police car chasing you can the Police car catch up to you? No.

If you go faster than the speed of sound can a sound from behind catch up to you? No.

If you go faster than the speed of light can you see your face in a mirror? No.

Mmmm, that last one is not such a simple answer. Firstly, faster than light travel is not possible within current understanding, so it isn't possible to determine what the answer would be. If it is possible, it is also time travel.

But if you were to travel very close to light speed, the effect of looking in a mirror would not be as you would expect. Intuition might tell you that the light from you face would take much longer to reach the mirror than usual because the mirror would be moving forward at near light speed and the light would be trying to catch it up.

But that is not the case. The light will take exactly the same time to reach the mirror as if you were stationary. The reason being that there is no stationary ... everything is relative. The fact that you are moving while perhaps someone else sees you travel by doesn't matter. You are no more special than they are .. you could equally be the one who is stationary and them the one that is moving. There are no grid lines in space to compare to, only the relative movement between things.

So with you holding the mirror a metre away you will see that the light takes 1/300,000,000 of a second since light travels at 300,000,000 metres per second.

The freaky part is when that other person looks as you whizz by them at near the speed of light. They see you going near to the speed of light and the light coming off your face. So how fast so they see that light going ? Your speed + the speed of light ? Nope, that's not allowed, that's not how the universe works. They also see it travelling at the speed of light. But since they see the mirror travelling close to that speed, they do see the problem of the light having to catch up with the mirror. So to them, it will take much longer than 1/300,000,000 of a second for the light to reach the mirror.

What seemed quick to you will seem much slower to them which is relativity.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Question About Sonic Boom
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Question About Hydrogen Sub-sonic Engines posted Fri Jan 11 2002 04:32:56 by Planelover
Question About Ice & Snow Intake posted Mon Apr 19 2010 10:41:26 by B727fan
Question About This TU-154 Cockpit Video posted Sat Apr 10 2010 15:27:00 by planenutz
Question About The Boeing 757 Fuselage posted Thu Feb 25 2010 10:17:33 by canadiantree
Question About A300 B4 Deicing Procedures posted Wed Feb 24 2010 01:10:00 by JETPILOT
Size, Shape And Sonic Boom Relations posted Sun Feb 21 2010 21:25:49 by sovietjet
Question About 744 Ailerons Locking posted Thu Jan 28 2010 19:47:48 by Richiemo
Question About ATC Route Clearances posted Thu Jan 28 2010 18:05:35 by N537FX
Question About Aircraft Generators posted Wed Nov 25 2009 23:07:34 by N612ua
A Little Question About Engine posted Tue Sep 15 2009 01:15:10 by Alphafloor

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format