Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
DCA Missed Approach: How Common?  
User currently offlineVC10DC10 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 1037 posts, RR: 3
Posted (4 years 5 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4989 times:

This morning I found myself stuck in traffic in Virginia, waiting to cross the 14th Street Bridge into DC (it was about 9:15 or 9:20 am). I noticed a B737-800 (couldn't make out the livery, as with the position of the sun the aircraft was silhouetted against the sky) execute a missed approach.

I found myself wondering how common this is at DCA, and specifically what might have caused this event today. Thanks in advance for any comments.

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinebri2k1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 988 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (4 years 4 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 4747 times:

I see that no one has commented yet. Let me start by apologizing for I don't know the answer to your question about how common it is.

What I can offer is that such things are not usually (officially or publicly) tracked. It's a safety concern, since if "number of missed approaches" was used as a measure of performance, it could encourage pilots to avoid conducting them, even when prudent, and thus reduce safety. I imagine it is unlikely that you could get much more than an anecdotal response to this kind of question about any airport for this reason.



Position and hold
User currently offlinePGNCS From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 2858 posts, RR: 48
Reply 2, posted (4 years 4 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4701 times:

Quoting bri2k1 (Reply 1):
What I can offer is that such things are not usually (officially or publicly) tracked. It's a safety concern, since if "number of missed approaches" was used as a measure of performance, it could encourage pilots to avoid conducting them, even when prudent, and thus reduce safety. I imagine it is unlikely that you could get much more than an anecdotal response to this kind of question about any airport for this reason.

Not at my carrier. At my rather large carrier go arounds / missed approaches are required when several parameters are not met at certain gates (i.e. the approach must be stabilized) and NOT doing one is what gets analyst's attention. Our manual set specifically states that go arounds are not considered a sign of poor performance, and should be executed whenever the outcome or stability of the approach is in doubt. I have never, ever seen a pilot disciplined or counseled for executing a go around when they thought it was necessary, the opposite is not true.


User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (4 years 4 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 4666 times:

Quoting PGNCS (Reply 2):
I have never, ever seen a pilot disciplined or counseled for executing a go around when they thought it was necessary, the opposite is not true.

I would certainly hope that in these days no crew would be dealt with in a negative manner, only as you mentioned when the opposite is true and they attempt to salvage a very bad approach etc.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlinebri2k1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 988 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4607 times:

Quoting PGNCS (Reply 2):
At my rather large carrier go arounds / missed approaches are required when several parameters are not met

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Perhaps I worded it in a confusing way. I'm trying to say if a pilot's performance was measured according to how few missed approaches he conducted it would be a detriment to safety. So, it's not something that people go around bragging about, i.e. no one would ever say "Carrier XYZ has the lowest percentage of missed approaches!"



Position and hold
User currently offlinePGNCS From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 2858 posts, RR: 48
Reply 5, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4562 times:

Quoting bri2k1 (Reply 4):
Quoting PGNCS (Reply 2):
At my rather large carrier go arounds / missed approaches are required when several parameters are not met

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Perhaps I worded it in a confusing way. I'm trying to say if a pilot's performance was measured according to how few missed approaches he conducted it would be a detriment to safety. So, it's not something that people go around bragging about, i.e. no one would ever say "Carrier XYZ has the lowest percentage of missed approaches!"

I read and re-read your original post agian, and perhaps I misunderstood you. If so I apologize. I thought you were saying that pilots didn't miss when they should for fear of disciplinary action, when it actually seems that what you meant was that if we started using rate of missed approaches as a metric then any given missed approach could be taken as a sign of poor performance. I think I was confused by the wording of the post, and while I am not sure about your premise, I do recognize the nuance in it now. Thanks for clarifying!  
Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 3):
Quoting PGNCS (Reply 2):
I have never, ever seen a pilot disciplined or counseled for executing a go around when they thought it was necessary, the opposite is not true.

I would certainly hope that in these days no crew would be dealt with in a negative manner, only as you mentioned when the opposite is true and they attempt to salvage a very bad approach etc.

Programs like FOQA and ASAP are great for situations like this, and I am all for them. If you are making good decisions, or if you made a poor decision and decided to abandon it with a missed approach (there are other scenarios, of course), which is a good decision, you will (virtually) never be hassled for it. If you force a bad position, aren't stable, land long, heaget overheated brakes, or worse, depart the runway, obviously that is more deservedly attention getting.

From the time I came into the industry until now, the philosophy at our carrier (and others) really has markedly changed from a punishment culture to a safety culture.


User currently offlineJCS17 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 8065 posts, RR: 39
Reply 6, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4453 times:

Compared to most major airports, many more than average, especially on the river visual approach. It's a challenging approach even in good weather as the PIC has to follow the Potomac's curves, has to monitor the aircraft's parameters, all the while keeping in mind its a relatively short field.


America's chickens are coming home to rooooost!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic DCA Missed Approach: How Common?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Missed Approach Without A Hold posted Thu Apr 29 2010 17:00:10 by VokinLoksar
Missed Approach Video posted Sun Mar 23 2008 17:59:36 by RichM
CAT III Missed Approach posted Wed Jul 11 2007 04:23:38 by Vikkyvik
Fuel Contamination - How Common? posted Mon Aug 8 2005 14:30:26 by Glidepath73
Another Missed Approach! posted Mon Jun 21 2004 17:22:21 by N62NA
Missed Approach posted Fri Jun 4 2004 04:22:58 by KitchellSnow
Back Course Approaches: How Common? posted Thu Jul 24 2003 07:57:24 by S.p.a.s.
Airliner Combi Configured Cabins - How Common? posted Tue Mar 25 2003 00:59:34 by Mr Spaceman
Missed Approach With Correction. posted Thu Nov 28 2002 10:45:16 by Sudden
777-300 Missed Approach/Go Around posted Thu Jan 17 2002 20:34:23 by FrequentFlyKid

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format