Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
No External Lights On At Night?  
User currently offlineGingerSnap From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2010, 893 posts, RR: 5
Posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 5369 times:

Hi guys and girls.
I'm a first time poster, and a long time lurker so it's finally great to be part of this wonderful site.

The past two nights, i've observed two seperate U2 A319s pass overhead my house at roughly 2200 (same time both nights) without any external lights on whatsoever (and it's pretty dark here at this time in Glasgow).

What does baffle me however, was upon turning final for rwy 23 at GLA (both times), both aircraft lit up like a christmas tree. The main difference was last night the cabin lights were able to be seen quite prominantly but there were no external lights on at all.
However, as mentioned as soon as both aircraft turned finals, the Nav, Beacon, Strobe & Landing lights were all 'switched' on.

Any ideas as to what may have been going on the past two nights, with these (possibly the same) aircraft?

Many thanks, and again great to be part of this site.
Matt


Flown on: A306 A319/20/21 A332 B732/3/4/5/7/8 B742/4 B752 B762/3 B772/W C152 E195 F70/100 MD-82 Q400
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineshamrock321 From Ireland, joined May 2008, 1592 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 5256 times:

Ive never seen this beofre, sureley the NAV and strobe lights should be on all the time? I seen a ZB A320 land in DUB tonight with no landing lights, they were quickly turned on after touchdown!

User currently offlineGingerSnap From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2010, 893 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 5196 times:

Quoting shamrock321 (Reply 1):
ve never seen this beofre, sureley the NAV and strobe lights should be on all the time? I seen a ZB A320 land in DUB tonight with no landing lights, they were quickly turned on after touchdown!

I'm with you in that i'd have thought that also. But on both occasions, there were no NAV, strobe, beacon or landing lights present (just before turning finals).



Flown on: A306 A319/20/21 A332 B732/3/4/5/7/8 B742/4 B752 B762/3 B772/W C152 E195 F70/100 MD-82 Q400
User currently offlineTPA36R From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 210 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 5181 times:

Quoting GingerSnap (Thread starter):

I'm not familiar with Airbus' lighting system however I know on many aircraft nav and strobes are very directional (lateral and above). That doesn't explain the beacon being off but its a start.

It could be SOP of some sort with the airline or maybe a "keep the peace" measure with the locals near the airport (maybe a measure of a out of sight, out of mind thing?).

[Edited 2010-08-29 15:11:02]

User currently offlineGingerSnap From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2010, 893 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 5153 times:

Quoting TPA36R (Reply 3):
I'm not familiar with Airbus' lighting system however I know on many aircraft nav and strobes are very directional (lateral and above). That doesn't explain the beacon being off but its a start.

Sorry I should have clarified that the external lights have been quite visible on other aircraft, but it is an interesting suggestion.
In the night sky, you could have barely make out the aircraft which one would think to be a safety hazard (light pollution of course being a factor obviously).

Thanks for the quick replies thus far however.



Flown on: A306 A319/20/21 A332 B732/3/4/5/7/8 B742/4 B752 B762/3 B772/W C152 E195 F70/100 MD-82 Q400
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 5, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 5083 times:

Quoting GingerSnap (Reply 4):
In the night sky, you could have barely make out the aircraft which one would think to be a safety hazard (light pollution of course being a factor obviously).

It's obviously a good idea to be visible, but if you're IFR then ATC is responsible for maintaining safe separation.

The pilot is still responsible for safe operation of the aircraft but, at least in theory, not being visible isn't an inherent hazard for some kinds of IFR flying.

Tom.


User currently offlinefreeze3192 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 164 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 4680 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 5):
It's obviously a good idea to be visible, but if you're IFR then ATC is responsible for maintaining safe separation.

The pilot is still responsible for safe operation of the aircraft but, at least in theory, not being visible isn't an inherent hazard for some kinds of IFR flying.

Tom.

In the US, if you're IFR and in VMC you're still responsible for the "see and be seen" concept.



"A passenger bets his life that his pilot is a worthy heir to an ancient tradition of excellence and professionalism."
User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9709 posts, RR: 27
Reply 7, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 4668 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 5):
It's obviously a good idea to be visible, but if you're IFR then ATC is responsible for maintaining safe separation.

The pilot is still responsible for safe operation of the aircraft but, at least in theory, not being visible isn't an inherent hazard for some kinds of IFR flying.

Would the lights still be required to be on per regulation, though? Even if the pilots aren't responsible for separation?



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinebri2k1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 988 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 4532 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 7):

Yes, I think so. I know it is under Part 91, and I would be shocked if any 135 or 121 operations manual was approved with less stringent requirements than these:

Quoting FAR Part 91 Section 209:
No person may:

(a) During the period from sunset to sunrise (or, in Alaska, during the period a prominent unlighted object cannot be seen from a distance of 3 statute miles or the sun is more than 6 degrees below the horizon) --

(1) Operate an aircraft unless it has lighted position lights;

(2) Park or move an aircraft in, or in dangerous proximity to, a night flight operations area of an airport unless the aircraft --

(i) Is clearly illuminated;

(ii) Has lighted position lights; or

(iii) is in an area that is marked by obstruction lights;

...

or
(b) Operate an aircraft that is equipped with an anticollision light system, unless it has lighted anticollision lights. However, the anticollision lights need not be lighted when the pilot-in-command determines that, because of operating conditions, it would be in the interest of safety to turn the lights off.

The last point is referring mainly to the use of strobe lights in clouds or fog when the reflection from the bright flashes cause temporary night blindness. A lot of newer GA aircraft are eliminating the red beacon and just using wingtip strobes as anticollision lights, and in a number of conditions it's safer to switch them off. I can't determine from the information given so far why a pilot might think it is in the interest of safety to switch off all exterior lights. Below 10,000 MSL, most pilots would like to light up as brightly as possible to aid identification and separation, particularly IFR-VFR separation.



Position and hold
User currently offlineYWG From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 1145 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4255 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 7):
Would the lights still be required to be on per regulation, though? Even if the pilots aren't responsible for separation?

In Canada it's against the CARS not to have the lights on during night ops.



Contact Winnipeg center now on 134.4, good day.
User currently offlinekimberlyrj From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2008, 385 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4187 times:

Hey hey

I am not aware of any ‘formal’ rules but I am sure there must be! I have never seen an aircraft at night which has had no lights on at all... I have seen aircraft look as if there are no lights on and then when the aircraft turns or the angle changes you can then see the light, often just nav.

Sometimes when the ‘logo’, ‘wing’ and cabin lights are off it can make the aircraft look very dark indeed, I think with all of those lights off it’s hard to tell which way or at what angle the aircraft is at.

Kimberly


User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 11, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4159 times:

Quoting kimberlyrj (Reply 10):
I have never seen an aircraft at night which has had no lights on at all...

How would you?

Tom.


User currently offlineZeke From Hong Kong, joined Dec 2006, 8848 posts, RR: 75
Reply 12, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 4075 times:

Quoting GingerSnap (Thread starter):

Any ideas as to what may have been going on the past two nights, with these (possibly the same) aircraft?

Logo lights on Airbus aircraft I am familiar with only come on if the gear is compressed (i.e. on the ground) and/or flaps are extended. Manoeuvring for an approach it is possible that they flaps were not extended, and the aircraft was flying ‘clean’.

Nav lights are only visible though a selected arc in relation to the aircraft, so other pilots can judge which way the aircraft is travelling.



We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31660 posts, RR: 56
Reply 13, posted (3 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3752 times:

Out here Position & navigation lights should be functional before an Aircraft is considered Airworthy.
Unless there was a snag enroute,but why twice is surprising.
regds
MEL.



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineCanadianNorth From Canada, joined Aug 2002, 3389 posts, RR: 9
Reply 14, posted (3 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3742 times:

From the Canadian Aviation Regulations ...

"605.17 (1) Subject to subsection (2), no person shall operate an aircraft in the air or on the ground at night, or on water between sunset and sunrise, unless the aircraft position lights and anti-collision lights are turned on."

http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviatio...erv/cars/part6-605-2438.htm#605_16



CanadianNorth



What could possibly go wrong?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic No External Lights On At Night?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No Logo Lights On Most Flights? posted Sun Mar 20 2005 14:40:18 by Skywatch
No Lights At Night posted Mon Mar 4 2002 20:02:35 by David B.
Cabin Lights Dimmed During Landing At Night posted Tue May 6 2008 12:57:00 by Krje1980
Taking Off At Night Without Runway Lights - Legal? posted Thu Mar 27 2008 01:28:01 by PiedmontINT
UPS 757 Landing At Night W/o Lights? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 08:00:51 by Motopolitico
Why No Psgr. Bay On Aircraft Like Space Shuttle? posted Mon Jul 5 2010 18:04:54 by rightrudder
Flight Rules At Night: Which Countries Do What? posted Mon Feb 1 2010 04:59:02 by Glom
Landing Lights On And Off In Cruise posted Thu Oct 1 2009 09:21:53 by DocLightning
E170: No Anti-Ice On Certain Parts? posted Wed Oct 29 2008 11:57:24 by AndyinPIT
Why No Nose-door On A Converted 747? posted Tue Jun 10 2008 01:25:00 by TommyBP251b

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format