Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Volumetric Weight - Perfect Goods  
User currently offlineWoof From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (3 years 7 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2204 times:

I've had to ship lots of things overseas through the years, and I've yet to ship anything whos weight and volume matched the carriers volumetric weight calculations. The items I've shipped have either been much heavier than their volumetric size, or much larger than their volumetric weight.

Today, for example, I've shipped some old cockpit panels from a 737. The package weighed just 2kg, but was 95x30x50cm in size, so I paid for a volumetric weight of 24kg.

So, I'm wondering what single material, generally, would create a volumetric weight of 1:1? I thought this might be water, which weights 1g per cubic centimeter, so 1kg of water would take up 10x10x10cm, but this equates to 0.5kg in volumetric weight... so I have no clue.

Anyone help?

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineoly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6604 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (3 years 7 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2191 times:

Quoting Woof (Thread starter):
Today, for example, I've shipped some old cockpit panels from a 737. The package weighed just 2kg, but was 95x30x50cm in size, so I paid for a volumetric weight of 24kg.

From this I get a "density" of 168.42kg/m^3 (= 24/(0.95*0.3*0.5))

So if you had a box that was 1m x 1m x 1m and weighed 168.42kg then you'd be at 1:1.

Ground cork has a density of 160kg/m^3

http://www.simetric.co.uk/si_materials.htm

so a large box full of bits of cork would probably do it. Not a single material I know, but something like cork will be there or thereabouts. Bulk density of cork is 240kg/m^3.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlinepetertenthije From Netherlands, joined Jul 2001, 3309 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (3 years 7 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2190 times:

Volume/metric weight is also dependant on the mode of transit and even the individual carrier involved. In road transport and ocean (LCL) a volume/metric of 333 KGs per Cu-M is most common in Europe. From what I hear from my US collegues, they usually calculate 250 KGs per Cu-M.

I do not know what the standard is for airfreight.


edited to add:

The reason that, in Europe, the default is 333 KGs is very simple: it's to max out a truck. A typical trailer will carry up to 24000 KGs and has a maximum capacity of 89 Cu-M ("tautliner": 13,6M x 2,45M x ~2,7M). However, with standard pallets you would normally end up loading a truck at ~72 Cu-M. Divide 24000 by 72 and you get 333.

[Edited 2010-09-15 09:19:59]


Attamottamotta!
User currently offlineWoof From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (3 years 7 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2080 times:

Thanks for the replies guys. The moral of the story for me is...

If you are shipping goods that are not the perfect weight / size combination, try and combine them with goods that make the total package as close to the ideal mass as possible. I'm sure this is 'sucking eggs' for those in the know, but it will save me some money in the future.


User currently offlinepetertenthije From Netherlands, joined Jul 2001, 3309 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (3 years 7 months 3 days ago) and read 2069 times:

Quoting Woof (Reply 3):

If you are shipping goods that are not the perfect weight / size combination, try and combine them with goods that make the total package as close to the ideal mass as possible.

Yes, preferably without increasing the dimensions.

So if you got a big box of 1,0 Cu-M (Chg-Wght 333 KGs) that weighs 250 KGs, then you can in essence freely add ~80 KGs as long as the size of the box does not increase. So if you got some unused space in your box, you migt as well use it as your shipping price won't be affected. You might have some additional handling or customs costs, assuming they are charged in real KGs as opposed to Chg-Kgs, but that should be relatively small change.

Note: above example uses road / LCL weights. The chargeable weight for air might be different!



Attamottamotta!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Volumetric Weight - Perfect Goods
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Was The Fokker F.27 Ever Weight Restricted? posted Fri Jul 9 2010 11:54:15 by Access-Air
East Coast Heatwave 7/6: DCA Weight Restrictions? posted Tue Jul 6 2010 18:35:28 by 777fan
Thrust To Weight Ratio Comparison posted Thu Jun 17 2010 20:11:50 by FX772LRF
Dash 8 Q200 Weight Restrictions? posted Fri Apr 23 2010 13:01:55 by Airport
Does AA Save Any Weight On Its Livery? posted Wed Apr 21 2010 15:49:40 by 4tet
Thrust To Weight? posted Sat Apr 3 2010 06:37:12 by usscvr
VIP Configured A/c: Weight/Balance posted Tue Jan 26 2010 12:26:38 by Skysurfer
Football Charter Weight Question posted Thu Jan 14 2010 13:27:12 by Nwray
757 Can Land At Maximum Takeoff Weight? posted Tue Oct 27 2009 19:03:52 by Jawed
737-300 Airframe Shell Weight posted Mon Oct 12 2009 09:19:05 by An225

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format