Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
VOR/TACAN And Runway Lights Questions  
User currently offlinesmartt1982 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 225 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 8 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 8770 times:

I recently saw this NOTAM

LIBR BRINDISI VORTAC 'BRD' FREQ 113.20MHZ CH79X AVBL AS FLW:
1.VOR OPERATIVE 2.TACAN DME PART OPR, AZIMUTH PART OUT OF SER.
FLIGHT LEVEL FROM SFC TO UNL
VALID FROM 1328 22-NOV-2010 TO 1230 30-NOV-2010 EST: (M5164/10)

My question is, what exactly do they mean when they say that the VOR is operative and the TACAN DME is also but azimuth part is not. To a civilian aircraft should it work as normal and only military aircraft would be affected. Are military aircraft not be able to pick up the VOR part and have to have a separate part of the TACAN for radial finding? Would the VOR and TACAN share the same DME?

Also in relation to abbreviations on JEPP approach plates I came across this abbreviation on approach light systems, RCLM and RL, any ideas?

Many Thanks
Steve

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21527 posts, RR: 55
Reply 1, posted (3 years 8 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 8754 times:

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
what exactly do they mean when they say that the VOR is operative and the TACAN DME is also but azimuth part is not.

They mean that aircraft that rely on TACAN for azimuth information (as opposed to the VOR) will not be able to get that information, and thus can't use that TACAN for navigation.

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
Are military aircraft not be able to pick up the VOR part and have to have a separate part of the TACAN for radial finding?

I'd think most military aircraft do have VOR equipment, so the only effect that this would have on them is that they have to use that equipment instead of their TACAN equipment. Sort of like when a VOR is out of service, but you can still navigate to it by GPS.

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
Would the VOR and TACAN share the same DME?

That's one way of looking at it. Another way is to say that the VOR has no DME, and that it all comes off the TACAN. Since the VOR and TACAN are co-located in this case (as they are with any VORTAC), it amounts to the same thing.

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
RCLM

Runway CenterLine Markings

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
RL

Runway Lights (meaning the edge lights)

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineVmcavmcg From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (3 years 8 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 8724 times:

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
Would the VOR and TACAN share the same DME?

As MIR stated the VOR has no DME associated with it. It is then called a VORTAC. However a VOR just provides bearing and no distance, while a VORTAC provides both. Most tactical military aircraft only have TACAN installed.

The other question about the runway lights is also correct. Runway lights and Runway Centerline Marking


User currently offlinemmedford From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 561 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (3 years 8 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 8724 times:

The TACAN contains the DME, if you disable the TACAN part of it...it's now a VOR/DME-R.


ILS = It'll Land Somewhere
User currently onlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21527 posts, RR: 55
Reply 4, posted (3 years 8 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 8657 times:

Quoting Vmcavmcg (Reply 2):
Most tactical military aircraft only have TACAN installed.

Interesting. So if you've got a VOR/DME, the average tactical aircraft couldn't find it without the use of some sort of RNAV system?

Quoting mmedford (Reply 3):
a VOR/DME-R.

Ok, you got me. What's the R for?

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlinezeke From Hong Kong, joined Dec 2006, 8872 posts, RR: 75
Reply 5, posted (3 years 8 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 8609 times:

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
My question is, what exactly do they mean when they say that the VOR is operative and the TACAN DME is also but azimuth part is not.

The VOR has the azimuth transmitted in the VHF band the TACAN transmits azimuth on the UHF band. Both the DME and TACAN use the same UHF bands for distance information (it is like a radar pulse).

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
To a civilian aircraft should it work as normal and only military aircraft would be affected.

Correct

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
Are military aircraft not be able to pick up the VOR part and have to have a separate part of the TACAN for radial finding?

Depends on the aircraft, many would have that capability as they can also receive an ILS which is also VHF.

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
Would the VOR and TACAN share the same DME?

They can.

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
Also in relation to abbreviations on JEPP approach plates I came across this abbreviation on approach light systems, RCLM and RL, any ideas?

RCLM are the light buried into the runway centreline that are white at the start of the runway, alternate red/white as you approach the far end, and then a fully red for the last portion. Runway edge lighting (RL) are normally all white.

Quoting mmedford (Reply 3):
The TACAN contains the DME, if you disable the TACAN part of it...it's now a VOR/DME-R.

It is still a VORTAC with an unserviceable component, however it has the same capability as a collocated VOR/DME.



We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic VOR/TACAN And Runway Lights Questions
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Questions About B757 Climb And Runway Parameters posted Tue Nov 1 2005 14:13:08 by 9V-SPJ
A Few Questions (VOR Nav And AT) posted Tue Nov 20 2001 01:44:01 by WarriorII
VOR, NDB, And ADF posted Wed Aug 12 2009 00:34:28 by Propilot83
Runway Lights, How Often Do They Change Them? posted Sat Oct 11 2008 19:15:05 by Aircanada014
Takeoff Rolls And Climb Rate Questions posted Thu Jul 24 2008 13:28:00 by Thrust
Taking Off At Night Without Runway Lights - Legal? posted Thu Mar 27 2008 01:28:01 by PiedmontINT
Runway Lights posted Sun Jan 13 2008 20:24:22 by A318
UPGRADE, And Aircraft Rating Questions posted Thu Aug 2 2007 23:50:48 by JETBLUEATASW
Landing And Taxi Lights? posted Sun Sep 11 2005 14:17:09 by Qantas744ER
A319LR: Mtow And Runway Length posted Sat Aug 7 2004 11:57:16 by Eg777er

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format