Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
DC-8 80/ Noe?  
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3757 posts, RR: 2
Posted (3 years 10 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2377 times:

Let's say a there a DC-8 fan with a very large bank account, and he wanted to up date some DC-8 73s by replacing their four CFM 56-2 with four Pratt & Whittney P1000G, and he also changing their cockpit to two man cockpit, could it work? Douglas planes are know for their long life, heck there are still DC-3 flying around, and the last DC-3 was built in the 40's. So could a DC-8 83 work?

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineconnies4ever From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 4066 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (3 years 10 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2362 times:

I think technically it could be done, but the reason the 'Lead Sled' has lasted as long as it has is that the airframe itself is very robust, which is a polite way to say it has a weight problem. Which means the economics would probably at best be marginal going forward into $100+ oil. Even with Pure Power.

Still, an interesting idea.



Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
User currently offlineboacvc10 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 623 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 10 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2324 times:

Quoting 747400sp (Thread starter):
Let's say a there a DC-8 fan with a very large bank account, and he wanted to up date some DC-8 73s by replacing their four CFM 56-2 with four Pratt & Whittney P1000G, and he also changing their cockpit to two man cockpit, could it work? Douglas planes are know for their long life, heck there are still DC-3 flying around, and the last DC-3 was built in the 40's. So could a DC-8 83 work?

Did you make a typo? DC-8 73 in the first two lines, and DC-8 83 in the last line... or did I misunderstand and someone "with a very large bank account" is trying to convert a DC-8 73 into a DC-8 83 (whatever those are).



Up, up and Away!
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3757 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (3 years 10 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2302 times:

Quoting boacvc10 (Reply 2):
Did you make a typo? DC-8 73 in the first two lines, and DC-8 83 in the last line... or did I misunderstand and someone "with a very large bank account" is trying to convert a DC-8 73 into a DC-8 83 (whatever those are).

If you put P1000G on a DC-8 73, it is on longer 73 it a 83, just like it was change from a 63 into a 73 when it's JT3s was replaced with CFM 56-2.


User currently offlinebohica From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2749 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (3 years 10 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2298 times:

Quoting 747400sp (Thread starter):
a DC-8 fan with a very large bank account,

That's a good start.  
Quoting 747400sp (Thread starter):
he wanted to up date some DC-8 73s by replacing their four CFM 56-2 with four Pratt & Whittney P1000G, and he also changing their cockpit to two man cockpit, could it work?

I have a better idea. PM me and I will give you the address where your friend can send me a check instead.  

Seriously though, to re-engine a DC-8 and replace the cockpit as well as all the associated changes to electrical, hydraulic, fuel, and other systems would in itself be extremely expensive. Add the cost of certification and it's just not worth it.


User currently offlinefr8mech From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 5657 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (3 years 10 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2236 times:

Too many cables in the cockpit at the third seat, and the first 2 for that matter. Heck, there is even a button operated cable. All those cable operated valves would have to be modified to straight wire. That's a total rework of pneumatic, hydraulic and fuel systems.

Certification would be through the roof, if it would even be certified.



When seconds count...the police are minutes away.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic DC-8 80/ Noe?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
DC-9/MD-80/717 Eyebrow Plugs? posted Tue Apr 14 2009 21:40:36 by SXDFC
A Winglet/wingtips DC-9, MD-80, 90 And B717? posted Sat Dec 27 2008 05:29:06 by Boeingdotcom
DC-9 / MD-80 Elevator Bird Strike - Dangerous? posted Thu May 19 2005 01:50:45 by Prebennorholm
MD-80/DC-9 Crash posted Sat Aug 7 2004 16:54:06 by Infiniti757
DC-9/MD-80/B717 posted Fri Jul 23 2004 21:38:29 by Jetliner145
DC-9/MD-80 Engine Change posted Sun Jan 4 2004 19:35:29 by BR715-A1-30
DC-10 / MD-80 Vents posted Thu Jan 24 2002 21:56:39 by Rydawg82
DC-9/MD-80 Engine Maintainence posted Wed Sep 20 2000 08:30:13 by GUNDU
Restrictions On News Helicopters In DC Area posted Wed Jan 26 2011 13:18:41 by contrails67
Efficiency Of A330 Vs. DC-10 posted Mon Dec 13 2010 10:51:37 by tsugambler

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format