Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why The A332F Has A Short Tail Than The A332?  
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3501 posts, RR: 2
Posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3293 times:

I was checking the stats on the A332F, and I notice that it's tail was 55 ft high like the A333, instead of 58 ft like the A332. Could the reason why the A332F has a shorter tail, is due the relocation of the nose gear ?

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineflipdewaf From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2006, 1562 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3293 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Im going out on a limb here but I think its to do with the fact that a bigger fin can counteract more thrust (one engine inop) and so with more thrust the aircraft can lift more cargo.

Fred


User currently offlineA380900 From France, joined Dec 2003, 1103 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 3254 times:

Well I don't know for sure either but the height of the tail is also influenced by the angle of the plane with the ground. The regular A332 is pointing to the ground (on the ground), that is why they changed the front wheel, so they have a level floor on the ground. So the tail should be lower because of that alone... Not sure if there is a link with the A333 tail height. Maybe just randomness.

User currently offlineflipdewaf From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2006, 1562 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 3242 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting flipdewaf (Reply 1):

Sorry, I thought you meant the other way, longer on the 332f. I would think it was to do Wight longer nose gear but it seems too perfect almost.

Fred


User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17000 posts, RR: 67
Reply 4, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 3242 times:

I think the tails are the same height from the fuselage. However the pax version squats down forward so the tail sticks up further. The freight version requires a level floor so the nose gear is taller, meaning that the fuselage is pivoted further back on the mains and the tail is lower in the back. Works like a see-saw.


"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineXT6Wagon From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 3392 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 3193 times:

I think someone here posted that Airbus has revised the vertical stablizer and rudder a few times in the A330 family. Might be simply be the difference between an early A332 with a current A332

User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24868 posts, RR: 22
Reply 6, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3169 times:

Quoting XT6Wagon (Reply 5):
I think someone here posted that Airbus has revised the vertical stablizer and rudder a few times in the A330 family. Might be simply be the difference between an early A332 with a current A332

No I think it's due to the nosegear modification on the 332F so it sits level on the ground to facilitate cargo loading. If you raise the nose, the top of the tail will be closer to the ground. I don't think there's any difference in the 332 and 332F vertical stabilizers.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Why The A332F Has A Short Tail Than The A332?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why The Change Of Call Sign/flight Number? posted Fri Aug 6 2010 00:53:41 by MSJYOP28Apilot
Why Are There Multiple Codes For The Same Airport? posted Tue Apr 20 2010 10:11:50 by RobertS975
Why The C-919 Is Not Wider Than An A320? posted Sun Feb 14 2010 17:36:52 by 747400sp
Why Doesn't Airbus Put Winglets On The A306? posted Sat May 24 2008 18:50:29 by FalconBird
Why No DC-8-70 Series In The Early 1970s? posted Wed Feb 6 2008 09:32:50 by Happy-flier
Why No Over Wing Exits On The Tupolev Tu-214 posted Mon May 7 2007 06:32:21 by Jumbojim747
Why Not The Fuel Dump Option In The B6 A320? posted Thu Sep 22 2005 17:37:21 by Bongo
Why Not Engines On Top Of The Wings? posted Wed Jun 1 2005 00:21:25 by Keta
Why Didn't GE Offer A Powerplant For The 757? posted Mon Feb 2 2004 05:07:51 by Thrust
Why Can The 737-200 Shorter Runways Than 737 NGs? posted Sat Jan 10 2004 10:41:03 by Mozart

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format