Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Busy Airways And Tcas  
User currently offlinegopal From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 113 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2528 times:

Yesterday, I got a first hand experience of the busy skies over the US during my Airtran flight 676 from Orlando to Milwaukee. It was bright and sunny during most of the journey which enabled me to see our path being criss-crossed by contrails left by airliners at different levels. I was able to see a contrail every 7-10 minutes. The contrails were well defined, which means that they were left not too long before our arrival at that point. I was also very luck to witness at a Commuter jet ( may be a CRJ or an EMBRAER) whiz past us at a flight level above us (we were at 34000 ft).

The skies got progressively greyer as we approached Milwaukee. Milwaukee was shrouded by a thick cloud cover when we began our final descent into the airport. As soon as descended into the clouds, we suddenly started a steep ascent which continued for a 1-2 minutes. Soon we resumed our final approach course. The captain came on the air and explained that we got too close to a military tanker and had to back up to allow the safe distance between us and them. We landed safely in heavy cross winds.

On my way out I asked the Pilot about the incident who explained that the procedure was initiated by the them (I am assuming the Military tanker flight crew) because we got closer that 5 miles of them. My questions to the informed members are:

a) Could the crew of the Military tanker has remotely acitvated the TCAS the system on our plane which caused the temporary deviation from our approach path ?

b) Does the 5 miles separation only apply to Military planes only ?

Thanks,

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 1, posted (3 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2525 times:

Quoting gopal (Thread starter):
a) Could the crew of the Military tanker has remotely acitvated the TCAS the system on our plane which caused the temporary deviation from our approach path ?

The current generation of TCAS is a cooperative system...both boxes talk to each other and figure out what the appropriate resolution is. So it's not really that one activates the other. But 5 miles is too far out for a TCAS resolution advisory, as far as I know.

Tom.


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21529 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (3 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2511 times:

Quoting gopal (Thread starter):
On my way out I asked the Pilot about the incident who explained that the procedure was initiated by the them (I am assuming the Military tanker flight crew) because we got closer that 5 miles of them.

I'm going to disagree with your assumption and say that the pilot was meaning that ATC requested the deviation.

Quoting gopal (Thread starter):
b) Does the 5 miles separation only apply to Military planes only ?

5 miles separation applies any time when under the control of an ARTCC, as their radars are less precise as a result of less dense coverage.

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 1):
But 5 miles is too far out for a TCAS resolution advisory, as far as I know.

Way too far. Plus, a TCAS RA shouldn't last for 1-2 minutes.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlinejosekmlb From United States of America, joined May 2008, 493 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2471 times:

In the classes B-E airspace the separation for Approach is 3 miles laterally or 1000 ft vertically or visual separation for IFR to IFR aircraft.

User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 4, posted (3 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2442 times:

Quoting josekmlb (Reply 3):
In the classes B-E airspace the separation for Approach is 3 miles laterally or 1000 ft vertically or visual separation for IFR to IFR aircraft.

Not in all cases is it 3 NM. If you have aircraft which are 60 NM or further from an ASR-9 with MODE-S or 40 NM or more from an ASR-11 you must use 5 NM separation.

Quoting Mir (Reply 2):
as their radars are less precise as a result of less dense coverage.

Terminal RADAR systems update at 4.7ish sweeps a minute while the enroute Long Range RADAR updates at 12 seconds a minute. There are a few approach control facilities with ADS-B and an automation system which takes input from the ADS-B radio stations as well as RADAR sensors. The system is called FUSION and it provides a 1 second track update. There will be more faclities coming online this year.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlinegopal From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 113 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (3 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2383 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 4):
In the classes B-E airspace the separation for Approach is 3 miles laterally or 1000 ft vertically or visual separation for IFR to IFR aircraft.

What is B-E Airspace ? Thanks.


User currently offlineDiamondFlyer From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 1513 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (3 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2372 times:

Quoting gopal (Reply 5):
What is B-E Airspace

He meant Class B, C, D and E.

-DiamondFlyer


User currently offlinedxing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (3 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 2248 times:

Quoting gopal (Thread starter):
As soon as descended into the clouds, we suddenly started a steep ascent which continued for a 1-2 minutes. Soon we resumed our final approach course. The captain came on the air and explained that we got too close to a military tanker and had to back up to allow the safe distance between us and them. We landed safely in heavy cross winds.

Did you climb back out of the clouds? I'm wondering if there was a restricted area that went hot due to tanker activity and that caused the deviation? That happens a lot off the west coast and to a lesser degree off the east coast. I hope the cpt. used his mirrors for safety when he "backed up"!         


User currently offlineBigSaabowski From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 150 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (3 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2166 times:

Quoting dxing (Reply 7):

Did you climb back out of the clouds? I'm wondering if there was a restricted area that went hot due to tanker activity and that caused the deviation? That happens a lot off the west coast and to a lesser degree off the east coast. I hope the cpt. used his mirrors for safety when he "backed up"!

If this was on descent to Milwaukee, a Combat Air Patrol was set up over Chicago on Thursday evening with a tanker and several fighters, due to the President's visit.

[Edited 2011-04-16 17:36:05]

User currently offlinegopal From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 113 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (3 years 3 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2003 times:

Quoting BigSaabowski (Reply 8):
If this was on descent to Milwaukee, a Combat Air Patrol was set up over Chicago on Thursday evening with a tanker and several fighters, due to the President's visit.

It was indeed Milwaukee airport we were trying to land in. Thanks for the clarification. Now that I recall, we were on some kind of a holding pattern even before we descended into the clouds for our final approach. It could have been due the extra level of security due the president's visit. Also after coming out of the jetway to the terminal we heard an announcement related to Homeland security elevating the threat level to a particular color ( I do not remember which). All related to the President's visit, I think.

Thanks to all for their answers.

Quoting josekmlb (Reply 3):
In the classes B-E airspace the separation for Approach is 3 miles laterally or 1000 ft vertically or visual separation for IFR to IFR aircraft.

So if the 5m/3m horizontal separation is violated by a commerical airplane, does the ATC warn the pilot and does pilot have to take action or does the corrective action happen automatically?


User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 10, posted (3 years 3 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 1998 times:

Quoting gopal (Reply 9):
So if the 5m/3m horizontal separation is violated by a commerical airplane, does the ATC warn the pilot and does pilot have to take action or does the corrective action happen automatically?



If you're asking about ATC required separation, hopefully ATC has taken action to provide the correct separation standard.

If you're asking about TCAS, the traffic advisory (TA) and resolution advisory (RA) issued to the crew is automatic.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21529 posts, RR: 55
Reply 11, posted (3 years 3 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1964 times:

Quoting gopal (Reply 9):
Also after coming out of the jetway to the terminal we heard an announcement related to Homeland security elevating the threat level to a particular color ( I do not remember which). All related to the President's visit, I think.

The threat level has been the color of an orange for a while, and will probably continue to be the color of an orange for the remainder of eternity (or at least until someone decides to ditch the system). So I wouldn't read too much into that.

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 10):
If you're asking about TCAS, the traffic advisory (TA) and resolution advisory (RA) issued to the crew is automatic.

This is correct, but it will not happen at 3 or 5 miles - the two aircraft need to be closer than that.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 12, posted (3 years 3 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1962 times:

Quoting Mir (Reply 11):
This is correct, but it will not happen at 3 or 5 miles

It might if they're closure rate is fast enough, but I don't wish to be involved in that test!  



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineB747FE From Hong Kong, joined Jun 2004, 230 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (3 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1901 times:

Quoting Mir (Reply 2):
I'm going to disagree with your assumption and say that the pilot was meaning that ATC requested the deviation.

  

Quoting Mir (Reply 2):

Way too far. Plus, a TCAS RA shouldn't last for 1-2 minutes.

Not so fast.
TCAS protection is based on tau area, not range.
And it's threshold is basically defined by time. If the rate of closure is fast enough, you could very well have a RA at 5 NM.

Regards,
B747FE.



"Flying is more than a sport and more than a job; flying is pure passion and desire, which fill a lifetime"
User currently offlinegopal From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 113 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1800 times:

A top headline from about 2 hours ago states that the First lady's plane had to abort landing because it came too close to a military cargo C-17. Her plane was ordered to perform a series of "S" maneuvers which did not help. Therefore it was asked to abort it landing and circle the airport. It was allowed to land after a while. FAA is investigating if this due an error on the part of an ATC.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42669951/ns/politics-white_house/

After all ATC incidents that we have been reading in the news, I am beginning to wonder.


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21529 posts, RR: 55
Reply 15, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1778 times:

Quoting B747FE (Reply 13):
If the rate of closure is fast enough, you could very well have a RA at 5 NM.

True, but I shudder to think at what the closure rate would have to be for that to happen.

Quoting gopal (Reply 14):
A top headline from about 2 hours ago states that the First lady's plane had to abort landing because it came too close to a military cargo C-17. Her plane was ordered to perform a series of "S" maneuvers which did not help. Therefore it was asked to abort it landing and circle the airport. It was allowed to land after a while. FAA is investigating if this due an error on the part of an ATC.

The FAA will find that it was a simple case of "well, I thought that separation would work out, but it turns out it didn't, so I have to send the second airplane around to keep things safe". Happens all the time, and if anyone other than Michelle Obama had been on board, this wouldn't have even made the news.

Quoting gopal (Reply 14):
After all ATC incidents that we have been reading in the news, I am beginning to wonder.

Wonder not. This one is a non-event.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 16, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1729 times:

Quoting Mir (Reply 15):
Wonder not. This one is a non-event.



For sure. But begs the question, why push the edge of the separation envelope particularly with the recent activities with naps and movies?
  



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlinejosekmlb From United States of America, joined May 2008, 493 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1686 times:

Quoting gopal (Reply 9):
So if the 5m/3m horizontal separation is violated by a commerical airplane, does the ATC warn the pilot and does pilot have to take action

ATC will give vectors for traffic if need be or tell the pilot in trail to maintain a visual separation or even follow when on appch to the rwy with a visual separation.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Busy Airways And Tcas
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Airways East And West Pilot Question posted Fri Jul 4 2008 18:42:56 by SXDFC
SAS 737 And Light Aircraft, Tcas Incident, Norway posted Mon Jun 5 2006 21:54:00 by MerlinIIIB
Airways Betw Hawaii And California? posted Fri Jul 2 2004 01:28:15 by Timz
NAVaids And GPS Points On Airways posted Sun Mar 14 2004 09:13:28 by Tayloss
Flight Levels And Airways... posted Thu Dec 13 2001 21:15:19 by Covert
Would A Real Pilot Say “Roger...over And Out”? posted Mon Apr 11 2011 09:44:34 by lenbrazil
What Is The Difference Between Code-share And ... posted Thu Apr 7 2011 06:54:53 by LPSHobby
Bruhn, Zahn And Badin Types Of Venturi Tubes posted Sun Apr 3 2011 13:46:19 by kybernete
Fuel Stop Between Gulf And US West Coast posted Sun Mar 20 2011 22:42:04 by blueflyer
Boeing And After Sale Maintenance! posted Sat Mar 19 2011 19:32:16 by jlbmedia

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format