Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
RR Trent 772 Engine Capability   
User currently offlinedennys From France, joined May 2001, 900 posts, RR: 1
Posted (3 years 8 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 5028 times:

Hello
could RR Trend 772 ( set on. A330s ) have powered A340-500 or -600 ( instead of Trend 553 and Trend 556 ) ?
Any answer will be welcome
regards
dennys

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineZKNCL From New Zealand, joined Oct 2010, 295 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 8 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4922 times:

Quoting dennys (Thread starter):
Hello
could RR Trend 772 ( set on. A330s ) have powered A340-500 or -600 ( instead of Trend 553 and Trend 556 ) ?
Any answer will be welcome
regards
dennys

Hi Danny

Well here is my facts and research:

Well first its Trent but...

Possibly. The A340-500 and 600 use four engines instead of two (I suppose you already know that... I hope ) and the Trent 772 was only designed and certified for the A330. The Trent 700 is rated at 71,100lbf (316 kN) when the Trent 553 & 556 are rated at 53,000lbf. Also the Trent 772 weighs more than the 553 and 556. But they are both the same size in many factors. And The design of the A330 and A340 are very similar in many ways including the wings

Here is my final answer:

It would be able to power the A340-500 but with casualties like range, speed etc. which basically makes it a new A340 model called the A340-700      .

The A340-600, No because it is too much of a different aircraft in size, range, power, MTOW etc. If the Trent 772 were to power that aircraft I would file restraining orders for 2 km against them .

Regards,
ZKNCL


User currently offlinemanzoori From UK - England, joined Sep 2002, 1516 posts, RR: 33
Reply 2, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4280 times:

In very simple terms yes, but it would win no orders as it would be inefficient.

The fact is we designed the Trent 500s specifically for the mission profiles identified by Airbus for the A340-5/600 plus, with each engine iteration a lot of care and attention goes into improving its performance and reducing weight and cost.

I recall being highly amused at the time when a fellow A-Net enthusiast was exclaiming that the Trent 500 was simply a Trent 700 with a new fan... I suspect if one were to delve into the BOMs for each engine the commonaltiy could be traced to a few % and most of that would be standard parts such as bolts, nuts etc.

Cheers!

Rez



Flightlineimages DOT Com Photographer & Web Editor. RR Turbines Specialist
User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4700 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 4200 times:

Quoting manzoori (Reply 2):
I recall being highly amused at the time when a fellow A-Net enthusiast was exclaiming that the Trent 500 was simply a Trent 700 with a new fan... I suspect if one were to delve into the BOMs for each engine the commonaltiy could be traced to a few % and most of that would be standard parts such as bolts, nuts etc.

If anything, it could have the same fan as the 700 (at least the diameter is the same). But that's only speculation on my part.

Quoting ZKNCL (Reply 1):
It would be able to power the A340-500 but with casualties like range, speed etc. which basically makes it a new A340 model called the A340-700 .

The A340-600, No because it is too much of a different aircraft in size, range, power, MTOW etc. If the Trent 772 were to power that aircraft I would file restraining orders for 2 km against them

Maybe you could explain again why you think it could power the -500 but not the -600, because it doesn't make a lot of sense.

I'm going to agree with the answer provided in the second reply:

Quoting manzoori (Reply 2):
In very simple terms yes, but it would win no orders as it would be inefficient.

The fact is we designed the Trent 500s specifically for the mission profiles identified by Airbus for the A340-5/600 plus, with each engine iteration a lot of care and attention goes into improving its performance and reducing weight and cost.


[Edited 2011-05-03 16:13:33]


Exceptions confirm the rule.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic RR Trent 772 Engine Capability
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
A330/777 Engine Changes To RR Trent posted Sat Jul 17 2010 14:22:39 by faro
RR Trent Engine Expolsion (vid) posted Tue Jul 6 2010 17:21:48 by boeingfever777
RR Trent Engine Change posted Sat May 1 2004 09:37:59 by Nz1
RR Trent posted Thu Jan 28 2010 13:27:02 by Kimon
Alliance 7200 GP Vs RR Trent 900 posted Fri Jan 1 2010 06:44:09 by Kimon
Why Most A330's With RR Trent? posted Sat Oct 25 2008 17:05:37 by KU747
RR Trent 1000 For The B787 posted Tue Aug 7 2007 15:29:06 by TepidHalibut
Tri-jets Single Engine Capability posted Wed Jun 7 2006 18:03:16 by PolymerPlane
First Test-flight Of Trent 900 Engine For A380 posted Tue May 18 2004 14:15:52 by Ants
RR Trent 700 Powerplant? posted Tue Jun 24 2003 01:56:25 by CLOUDNINE

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format