Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
"Offset Approved..."  
User currently offlineModesto2 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2898 posts, RR: 5
Posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1796 times:

I was listening to my scanner last night at LAX. An American Eagle Saab 340 departed 24L and tower cleared it for take-off and added "offset approved." What does this phrase mean? If it makes any difference, the aircraft departed behind a JAL 747. Thank you.

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineMightyFalcon From Oman, joined Jun 2001, 384 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1750 times:

Hi Modesto2,

The offset procedure is used both for approach and area air traffic control, although for different reasons.

In the case you've witnessed, approving the Saab to fly on an offset track (from the original one flown by the JAL 747) is just a mean of keeping him out of the turbulence of the preceding heavy 747. His departure track will be parallel to the jumbo's by x Nm. The distance from the original track can be either specified by the controler or proposed by the pilot and then authorised or not by the controller.

En-route, the offset is mainly used when you have 2 flights, following the same airway for some time and too close to each other to provide them with the same cruising level. Later on, their routes are going to split so, not to penalise the traffic at the lowest level, we "push" one of them on an offset track (5,8 or 10 Nm to the original one) in order to get them both the same level.

Let's say the original route is: xxxxx-yyyyy-zzzzz. The traffic on the offset track will then fly on a stricly parrallel route 5Nm (for instance) off xxxxx-yyyyy-zzzzz.

Hope I have answered your questions.


The sky has no limit...
User currently offlineModesto2 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2898 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1727 times:

MightlyFalcon, you have confirmed my suspicions. In this particular case, would the Saab execute the take-off with the offset? Or would the pilots make a slight turn AFTER takeoff? Thanks for the insight.

User currently offlineMightyFalcon From Oman, joined Jun 2001, 384 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1722 times:

I wouldn't like to give you wrong figures about the approach offset procedure but I can tell you how this is performed en-route: Either the ATC gives a heading to split or he let the pilot do the standard procedure which is a 45 degree turn to join the offset track.

In the case you described, the Saab turned L/R short after take-off. One thing is sure, the Saab used the same runway than the 747, of course.

The sky has no limit...
User currently offlineJetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1706 times:

Most, if not all, FMS's have offset capability built into their programs. The pilot simply selects the NM offset (left or right) and plugs it into the box. It's a capability that is becoming more and more important - particually in non-radar international or foreign airspace. Pilots will intentionally put a bit of offset into their FMS's. In these days of GPS and RVSM accuracy it's getting to be pretty easy to be at EXACTLY the wrong place, at EXACTLY the wrong altitude, at Exactly the wrong time - if you get my drift.

However, Modesto, I doubt if it were anything as formal as this the other night. It's normal to offset slightly upwind (less than a mile) when following any aircraft where wake turbulence would be an issue. The pilot simply asks to offset slightly and ATC normally will be accomodating.

User currently offlineBen88 From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 1093 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1670 times:

The Saab would have turned immediately after take off. If offset is approved they don't have to respect the "no turns until coastline" regulation at LAX.

User currently offlineWill_ATL From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 41 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1610 times:

Is an offset the same thing as a deviation? Usually deviations seem to be to avoid weather. And I may be wrong, but I thought deviations were expressed in degrees rather than kms.

User currently offlineMightyFalcon From Oman, joined Jun 2001, 384 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1586 times:


An offset and a deviation are two different things, used for different purposes.

Once again, an offset is just a track strictly parallel to the original one and very unusually used for weather deviation. Furthermore, we're not using km as a distance unit in aeronautics but Nm (nautical miles).

Deviations are used for weather avoidance, of course but mostly to provide enough separation between crossing traffic at the same level or climbing/descending through the level of another one. Deviations are expressed in degrees.

The sky has no limit...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic "Offset Approved..."
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
"On Final" Or "On Finals"? posted Sat Feb 3 2007 01:09:05 by Evan767
Why Are These Engines "plugged"? posted Fri Dec 22 2006 01:31:20 by Brenintw
"Incidents" I've Experienced On QF 744's posted Wed Dec 13 2006 07:05:50 by Camohe
Narrow Bodies With "Heavy" Call Sign posted Tue Dec 12 2006 12:23:47 by SK A340
Do Aircraft Controls Have To Be "calibrated"? posted Sun Nov 12 2006 21:26:09 by Jamesbuk
MIT/Cambridge To Unveil "silent" Flying Wing 11/06 posted Mon Nov 6 2006 02:24:03 by Lemurs
What Is A "steam" Gauge? posted Thu Oct 26 2006 10:10:44 by Speedracer1407
"rain" Inside An MD 11 posted Thu Oct 19 2006 19:15:46 by RootsAir
"useless" Gen Av Fuel Gauges posted Mon Sep 18 2006 11:41:02 by Speedracer1407
Old IFE - "Stethescopes"/nostalgia posted Thu Jun 22 2006 17:05:40 by Bwi757
ATC Call Sign "Sasquatch" posted Sat May 23 2009 19:23:46 by Flywithken
"Realistic" Max Range Of Airliners? posted Sat Mar 28 2009 13:46:57 by PC12Fan

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format