Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why No A320 Family Retrofitted With Sharklets?  
User currently offlineSandroMag From Portugal, joined Nov 2007, 42 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4360 times:

The A320 NEO will have sharklets for fuel effiency, due to that why there is no Airbus now in service upgraded with them like many of Boeing planes? (737,757 and 767)?

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineB6JFKH81 From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 2878 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (2 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4339 times:

The retrofit program hasn't even rolled out yet. The first plane to be delivered with sharklets isn't even going to be delivered until 2012 IIRC. B6's planes won't be getting them factory direct until 2013 FWIK.


"If you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it"
User currently offlineTomFoolery From Austria, joined Jan 2004, 528 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (2 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4318 times:

The A32x require a somewhat more radical degree of structural modification to install the sharklets than do the winglets used on the 737s. It had been determined that due to the degree of work necessary, sharklets would only be installed during production, rather than as an aftermarket retrofit.

The 737 has a much more robust wing box, and a wing structure that allows the existing wingtips to be "chopped", so that the winglets can be mounted fairly easily, and cost effectively. The same holds true for the 757 and 767 models as well.

Hope this helps some.

Tom



Paper makes an airplane fly
User currently offlinemercure1 From French Polynesia, joined Jul 2008, 1310 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (2 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3832 times:

Quoting TomFoolery (Reply 2):
It had been determined that due to the degree of work necessary, sharklets would only be installed during production, rather than as an aftermarket retrofit.

Tom, is this recent news...?
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...os-converts-30-a320-orders-to.html

"Airbus is finally granting JetBlue's wishes for a winglet retrofit programme, and is working with the airline to become a launch customer to retrofit its existing A320 fleet"

The short history; JBU worked w/ Airbus for many hrs developing a winglet mod for the A320 over the last 5yrs.

Airbus shelved the idea, originally. My speculation, "A" probably delayed any proposed sharklet retrofit once they decided to offer factory new sharklet A320s and A320NEOs, perhaps fearing an impact of sales to these newer offerings. Seems like a big "A" customers (JBU), finally pushed Airbus over the edge, into offering such a retrofit.

No doubt, a sharklet retrofit on a earlier A320 model might be a supreme PITA, wrt wing structure reinforcements, but I would speculate JBU wouldn't have pushed Airbus into it, unless they believe it would provide some benefit, even considering all the PITA and additional wt it may cause.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Why No A320 Family Retrofitted With Sharklets?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No Aircraft With Flapping Wings? posted Thu Jan 22 2004 08:38:24 by UTA_FLYingHIGH
Why No 737 NG With IAE V2500 posted Tue Jan 22 2002 17:39:19 by 9Q-CLI
Why No Pitot Covers On Airliners? posted Fri Jul 22 2011 10:12:49 by notaxonrotax
New Composite Airliners, Why No Paint Issues? posted Sun Jul 17 2011 16:14:50 by Northwest727
Why No A32x Freighters? posted Sun Apr 17 2011 17:12:31 by 747400sp
Why No 3x4x2 Seating Instead Of 3x3x3? posted Tue Feb 8 2011 06:02:12 by LAX888
Why No Direct Rnav Flights Over Land? posted Sat Nov 27 2010 02:03:06 by Dainan
Why No Winglets On Brand New 767 For JAL? posted Thu Nov 25 2010 14:01:25 by windshear
737NG: Why No IAE Engine Option? posted Sun Oct 10 2010 20:52:45 by KGRB
Why No Adjustable Lumbar Support On DL 77Ls In Y? posted Thu Sep 2 2010 13:13:40 by 1337Delta764

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format