Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is It True That A 747 Has A Smaller Cockpit?  
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3757 posts, RR: 2
Posted (3 years 4 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 5890 times:

I read in an airliner mag, that 747 classic, had the smallest cockpit of all the first the gen wide bodies. So, is this true, if so, those pilots on trans Pac flight in the 80's, has to be cramp.  

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSpeedbird741 From Portugal, joined Aug 2008, 654 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 4 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 5829 times:

I assume that by first generation wide bodies you mean the DC-10, 1011, 747, and perhaps the A300. If so, then yes, the 747 did have the smallest (or so it felt) cockpit. I'm not sure how the A300's his as I have never been in one, but I believe it isn't far ahead in its size. The aforementioned trijets are noted for having roomy cockpits. Roomier than any of the new wide bodies in fact.

Speedbird741



Boa noite Faro, Air Portugal 257 climbing flight level 340
User currently offlineB747FE From Hong Kong, joined Jun 2004, 230 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (3 years 4 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 5772 times:

Quoting 747400sp (Thread starter):

It doesn't really feel so different than the DC-10, except for the visibility on the ground which is great on the DC compared with the 747.
In any case, I don't feel the size of the cockpit is an issue.

Regards,
B747FE.



"Flying is more than a sport and more than a job; flying is pure passion and desire, which fill a lifetime"
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17172 posts, RR: 66
Reply 3, posted (3 years 4 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 5743 times:

This is a function of its placement. All other widebody cockpits are on the main deck (or on the 380, between two twin-aisle decks). So they're wider and have a higher ceiling. The 747 cockpit is sitting at the front of what is basically a narrowbody cross section and in the crown of the aircraft.


"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently online747classic From Netherlands, joined Aug 2009, 2215 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (3 years 4 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 5703 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 3):
Quoting B747FE (Reply 2):

I fully agree on both statements ,

The cockpit is actually situated in the top of a pear-shaped fuselage, so the wide and height of the 747 cockpit is less than comparable wide bodies, designed at the same time.
However I never felt cramped in this cockpit, everything was always easy to reach, the major drawback was the relative high aerodynamic and air conditioning noise in the cockpit, especially in the older classic series, with less noise blankets. installed. I have operated the aircraft during the first years of my career even without a noise cushion installed at the escape hatch.
When we came up for our medical, after completion of the hearing check, the doctor always said to me : I see on the graph you are still on the 747 !!!!


But remember this : the cockpit area COSTS money, the cabin area EARNS money. So on the very efficient 747 the cockpit is relative small, compared to the money earning cabin area.



Operating a twin over the ocean, you're always one engine failure from a total emergency.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17172 posts, RR: 66
Reply 5, posted (3 years 4 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 5671 times:

Quoting 747classic (Reply 4):
But remember this : the cockpit area COSTS money, the cabin area EARNS money. So on the very efficient 747 the cockpit is relative small, compared to the money earning cabin area.

So you're saying they should sell seats in the cockpit? Sounds good to me. 



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineB777LRF From Luxembourg, joined Nov 2008, 1463 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (3 years 4 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 5356 times:

If you walk directly from an Elle TenEleven cockpit to a 747 ditto, yes it will indeed seem small and cramped. Still, it's virtually a ballroom compared to the front office in a Concorde.


From receips and radials over straight pipes to big fans - been there, done that, got the hearing defects to prove
User currently offlinePGNCS From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 2858 posts, RR: 49
Reply 7, posted (3 years 4 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 5268 times:

Quoting 747400sp (Thread starter):
pilots on trans Pac flight in the 80's, has to be cramp

It's still small and noisy even today.


User currently offlineCitationJet From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2468 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (3 years 4 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5170 times:

Quoting B777LRF (Reply 6):
Still, it's virtually a ballroom compared to the front office in a Concorde.

747-400:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Yochai Mossi - AirTeamImages
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Oliver Brunke



Concorde

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Marko Karppinen
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mark Broekhans




Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
User currently online747classic From Netherlands, joined Aug 2009, 2215 posts, RR: 14
Reply 9, posted (3 years 4 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4938 times:

Quoting CitationJet (Reply 8):
747-400 - Concorde



IMO you are comparing apples and pears , a two crew cockpit looks always less cramped than a three crew cockpit with a F/E panel installed at the sidewall.

A comparison between a classic 747 cockpit and the Concorde cockpit is more realistic and yes the Concorde is more cramped.



Operating a twin over the ocean, you're always one engine failure from a total emergency.
User currently offlinePGNCS From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 2858 posts, RR: 49
Reply 10, posted (3 years 4 months 22 hours ago) and read 4844 times:

Quoting 747classic (Reply 9):
A comparison between a classic 747 cockpit and the Concorde cockpit is more realistic and yes the Concorde is more cramped.

Well of course Concorde was more cramped...a supersonic airliner with the smallest possible cross section will definitely be smaller, but the question asked about "...the smallest cockpit of all the first the gen wide bodies," and the 747 does have the smallest cockpit of the original three widebodies to be certain, which also makes the point that "a two crew cockpit looks always less cramped than a three crew cockpit with a F/E panel installed at the sidewall" moot.

747classic's point "The cockpit is actually situated in the top of a pear-shaped fuselage, so the wide and height of the 747 cockpit is less than comparable wide bodies, designed at the same time" addresses the nature of the issue perfectly.

The corollary from the same (very good) post "However I never felt cramped in this cockpit, everything was always easy to reach, the major drawback was the relative high aerodynamic and air conditioning noise in the cockpit" I find to be a mixed bag. I think it's cramped compared to other widebody aircraft I have flown, I don't find the ergonomics particularly great, and the noise is horrendous by comparison. I'm glad I flew it but I don't miss it at all.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31702 posts, RR: 56
Reply 11, posted (3 years 4 months 4 hours ago) and read 4593 times:

Compared to a B737.......B747 Flight Deck/Cockpit seems no bother  


Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4778 posts, RR: 19
Reply 12, posted (3 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4308 times:

The late BP. Davies wrote 'handling the big jets' his book is still recognised as the acknowledged authority for Professional Pilots.



This is what he has to say about the B747 Cockpit.



''my conclusion after about thirty hours flying is that 'the enforced proximity to structure and the feeling of sitting 'in' rather than 'on' the aeroplane both lead to a close identification with the aeroplane and raise the accuracy of flight path control.



In other words, you wear it like a glove, like a B727 thats not a bad thing.



The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Is It True That A 747 Has A Smaller Cockpit?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is It True That Pilots Hate Technicians? posted Sat Oct 18 2008 03:51:47 by LH4116
Is It True A 747 Can Fly Belly-up For 12 Sec? posted Tue Dec 27 2005 21:59:09 by Tom12
A340 Lack Of Power - Is It True? posted Fri Oct 10 2008 11:30:14 by NEMA
Is It True... posted Sat Sep 30 2000 12:47:17 by Cricri
Twin Engined 747...is It Possible? posted Sun Aug 3 2008 21:54:35 by Jcchristie
Is It Possible To Make A Twin Engined B 747? posted Thu Nov 17 2005 20:25:49 by United Airline
That Passenger Has Flu And Is Sitting Next To Me posted Sat Nov 5 2005 20:03:37 by Julesmusician
Is It That Necessary To Dump Fuel? posted Fri Oct 15 2004 18:56:04 by Soaringadi
When Is It Busy N Cockpit? posted Mon Jan 29 2001 11:42:09 by Chopper
Afghan Airspace: Why Is It Used? posted Mon Jun 20 2011 13:24:05 by TheSonntag

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format