Change Forum... Civil Aviation Travel, Polls & Prefs Tech/Ops Aviation Hobby Aviation Photography Photography Feedback Trip Reports Military Av & Space Non-Aviation Site Related LIVE Chat My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search
 How Accurate Of Runway Distance Markers?
 DFWHeavy From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 560 posts, RR: 0Posted Thu Aug 18 2011 09:40:07 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 9773 times:

 I'm wanting to know how accurate the "1,000 ft" distance runway markers are. For example: If you have an 8,500 ft runway and you line up to take off, the first number you would typically see is "7" for 7,000 ft remaining, which means there is 1,500 ft between you and the first number. However, if you were to turn around, the last number you would see would still be "1" or 1,000 ft, but yet it would actually have to be 1,500 ft. So how accurate are runway distance markers? How do you compensate for the example I listed above. Every runway that isn't exactly 6,000, 7,000, 10,000, 12,000, etc would have this problem. Thanks!
 Christopher W Slovacek
 tdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12710 posts, RR: 78 Reply 1, posted Thu Aug 18 2011 21:40:15 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 9492 times:

 Quoting DFWHeavy (Thread starter):For example: If you have an 8,500 ft runway and you line up to take off, the first number you would typically see is "7" for 7,000 ft remaining, which means there is 1,500 ft between you and the first number. However, if you were to turn around, the last number you would see would still be "1" or 1,000 ft, but yet it would actually have to be 1,500 ft.

If you turned around, wouldn't the back of that sign just be black and there be another sign on the other side at the correct location for that number?

Tom.

 ukoverlander From United Kingdom, joined May 2010, 530 posts, RR: 0 Reply 2, posted Thu Aug 18 2011 21:46:10 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 9471 times:

 Quoting DFWHeavy (Thread starter):I'm wanting to know how accurate the "1,000 ft" distance runway markers are.

Is this a serious question?

They are 100% accurate. 1,000 foot markers are 1,000 feet apart.

 kcrwflyer From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3960 posts, RR: 7 Reply 3, posted Thu Aug 18 2011 22:21:46 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 9428 times:

 Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 1):If you turned around, wouldn't the back of that sign just be black and there be another sign on the other side at the correct location for that number?
 Quoting DFWHeavy (Thread starter):So how accurate are runway distance markers? How do you compensate for the example I listed above. Every runway that isn't exactly 6,000, 7,000, 10,000, 12,000, etc would have this problem.

Well they can't be perfect... Our runway is 6300ft. so I'd say you have 150 more ft available than what each marker says. I'd assume they do them the same way at all airports.. just splitting the difference in the length above the even thousand.

Do any airports have them on both sides of the runway for each direction?

 spacecadet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3993 posts, RR: 11 Reply 4, posted Thu Aug 18 2011 23:31:59 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 9370 times:

 Quoting kcrwflyer (Reply 3):Well they can't be perfect...

Why do you say that? Distance measurement is both a simple matter and an exact science, and these signs are potentially pretty important.

 I'm tired of being a wanna-be league bowler. I wanna be a league bowler!
 DFWHeavy From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 560 posts, RR: 0 Reply 5, posted Fri Aug 19 2011 05:55:14 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 9236 times:

 No, it isn't that simple. If you have a 9,500 ft runway, there will be 8 numbers; however, one of them has to be more than 1,000 ft apart, presumably the distance between of of the last ones and the threshold of the runway. If it was "simple", then you would have 9 1/2 number.... and you don't! Think about it before responding.
 Christopher W Slovacek
 qf002 From Australia, joined Jul 2011, 3390 posts, RR: 2 Reply 6, posted Fri Aug 19 2011 06:01:21 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 9209 times:

 Quoting DFWHeavy (Reply 5):If it was "simple", then you would have 9 1/2 number.... and you don't! Think about it before responding.

But the '9' isn't right at the end of a 9,500ft runway, is it? I always thought that there was just a bit of slack at the end (ie it's within the 9-10 zone, but there's no '10' because it's off in the distance) and the markers were always at 1,000ft intervals...

 cubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 24552 posts, RR: 22 Reply 7, posted Fri Aug 19 2011 06:05:42 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 9196 times:

 With respect to 9,500 foot runways, it's a silly question, as there are (correct) markers for both directions. But what about a runway that is 9,001 feet, 9,005 feet or 9,050 feet? I believe those runways WILL have only one set. There must be a cut-off somewhere.
 I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
 pilotfox From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 568 posts, RR: 0 Reply 8, posted Fri Aug 19 2011 06:34:08 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 9138 times:

 "The method chosen should be based on cost considerations and adaptability to the specific airport configuration. When using the preferred method or alternate method #2 for runway lengths that are not an exact multiple of 1,000 feet, one-half of the excess distance is added to the distance of each sign from each runway end. For example, for a runway length of 6,500 feet, the excess distance is 500 feet and the location of the last sign on each runway end is 1,000 feet plus 1/2(500) or 1,250 feet. If a sign cannot be installed at its standard location, a tolerance of +50/-0 feet is allowed for that sign. The sign should be omitted if it cannot be installed within this tolerance" More info is in FAA AC 150/5340-18F STANDARDS FOR AIRPORT SIGN SYSTEMS http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/m...Advisory_Circular/150_5340_18f.pdf
 DFWHeavy From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 560 posts, RR: 0 Reply 9, posted Fri Aug 19 2011 06:55:59 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 9096 times:

 Thank you pilotfox. For the people above. What I meant when I said "turn around" is, if you go to the first marker and turn around there would be a "1", but it is more than 1,000 ft. So either one of the marker's at either end is off or they would all be off slightly to compensate. Pilotfox gave us more accurate information and I thank him for that.
 Christopher W Slovacek
 cubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 24552 posts, RR: 22 Reply 10, posted Fri Aug 19 2011 07:05:00 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 9061 times:

 Quoting DFWHeavy (Reply 9):What I meant when I said "turn around" is, if you go to the first marker and turn around there would be a "1", but it is more than 1,000 ft.

But, again, on a 9,500 foot runway, that's not true in most cases.

 I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
 DFWHeavy From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 560 posts, RR: 0 Reply 11, posted Fri Aug 19 2011 07:07:44 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 9058 times:

 Which would answer my original question, in that they are not really all that accurate. I consider accurate withing a couple feet of 1,000. Cheers.
 Christopher W Slovacek
 Maverick623 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 6043 posts, RR: 7 Reply 12, posted Fri Aug 19 2011 15:21:02 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 8792 times:

A friendly note: you are asking for help and advice. It would be nice to be a little more polite and patient, especially when your posts contains incorrect assumptions.

 Quoting DFWHeavy (Reply 5): No, it isn't that simple. If you have a 9,500 ft runway, there will be 8 numbers; however, one of them has to be more than 1,000 ft apart, presumably the distance between of of the last ones and the threshold of the runway.

Not every airport uses the same signs for both directions, and for the ones that do, pilotfox explained the limitations.

Also:

 Quoting DFWHeavy (Reply 11): in that they are not really all that accurate. I consider accurate withing a couple feet of 1,000.

Runway markers are visual indicators to back up already known performance calculations, themselves having built-in margins. Visual indicators have limitations to their usefulness, hence why minimums are generally higher for visual approaches than for instrument approaches.

Since performance parameters will be slightly inaccurate (you simply cannot calculate exactly how your brakes are going to perform, nor exactly how much thrust your engine(s) will produce), you do not need such a high amount of accuracy in a visual indicator of runway length remaining. It's just like in math and significant figures: you can only be as accurate as your most inaccurate number.

 "PHX is Phoenix, PDX is the other city" -777Way
 Gunsontheroof From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 3543 posts, RR: 9 Reply 13, posted Fri Aug 19 2011 15:47:42 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 8739 times:

 This might be better off in tech/ops--lots of the brainy folks over there don't venture into civ-av and might be able to elaborate further!
 BMIFlyer From UK - England, joined Feb 2004, 8810 posts, RR: 56 Reply 14, posted Fri Aug 19 2011 16:11:42 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 8698 times:

 Guys, remember the signs show distance remaining. So.... On a 9500 ft runway, the first sign will be 500 ft from the end and will be a 9 - so 9000ft remaining. The 500ft area you just started from is not really relevant..... To make it easier, count from the opposite end of the runway to where you start your takeoff roll from
 Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own
 Maverick623 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 6043 posts, RR: 7 Reply 15, posted Fri Aug 19 2011 16:16:19 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 8684 times:

 Quoting BMIFlyer (Reply 14): On a 9500 ft runway, the first sign will be 500 ft from the end and will be a 9 - so 9000ft remaining. The 500ft area you just started from is not really relevant..... To make it easier, count from the opposite end of the runway to where you start your takeoff roll from

Yes, but some airports use both sides distance marker signs, even when the runway is not exactly x-thousand feet long.

 "PHX is Phoenix, PDX is the other city" -777Way
 vikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 12136 posts, RR: 24 Reply 16, posted Fri Aug 19 2011 18:44:35 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 8588 times:

 Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 1):If you turned around, wouldn't the back of that sign just be black and there be another sign on the other side at the correct location for that number?

Depends on the airport. Some airports (actually most that I've seen, I think) only have them on one side of the runway, so they are double-sided signs.

Then there are airports like BOS that have double-sided signs on BOTH sides of the runway.

From the AC that pilotfox posted:

Preferred Method. The most economical installation consists of double-faced signs located on only one side of the runway. Where this method is used, the signs should be placed on the left side of the runway as viewed from the most often used direction. However, the signs may all be placed on the right side of the runway where necessary because of runway/taxiway separation distances or conflicts between intersecting runways or taxiways.

 Quoting BMIFlyer (Reply 14):On a 9500 ft runway, the first sign will be 500 ft from the end and will be a 9 - so 9000ft remaining.

If you use the Preferred Method or Alternate Method 2 per the AC, then you wouldn't have a "9" sign on a 9500 foot runway.

 Quoting DFWHeavy (Reply 11):Which would answer my original question, in that they are not really all that accurate. I consider accurate withing a couple feet of 1,000.

I would say that "accuracy" in this case would mean whether the signs were installed according to the FAA's (or whatever regulatory body's) policies.

As it stands now, in general, you'll never have a "1" marker CLOSER to the threshold than 1000 feet. It could be up to 499 feet farther from the threshold, if I read correctly. And then all the signs between the "1" at either end would be 1000 feet apart (+50/-0 feet).

Now of course, I can immediately come up with a counterexample - BOS's runway 22R. The 1000 foot remaining marker is less than 1000 feet from the far threshold. But that was probably just installed before these regulations came into effect.

[Edited 2011-08-19 19:01:34]

[Edited 2011-08-19 19:02:12]

 I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 ThirtyEcho From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 1741 posts, RR: 1 Reply 17, posted Fri Aug 19 2011 21:50:51 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 8516 times:

 If a "couple of feet" is crucial in your takeoff then you are flying a B-25 off the deck of the Hornet in 1942.
 PGNCS From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 3080 posts, RR: 48 Reply 18, posted Sat Aug 20 2011 08:15:49 UTC (4 years 9 months 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 8444 times:

 Quoting DFWHeavy (Reply 11):Which would answer my original question, in that they are not really all that accurate. I consider accurate withing a couple feet of 1,000.

What exactly are you going to do with this super accurate (+/- 2') data when you are whizzing past these signs at 160 knots on the departure roll? Maverick623 made all the points that need to be made on the subject. Thank you also pilotfox for posting the relevant information.

 Quoting ThirtyEcho (Reply 17):If a "couple of feet" is crucial in your takeoff then you are flying a B-25 off the deck of the Hornet in 1942.

Well said!

Computerized performance numbers are good at getting theoretical distances awfully close to BFL these days!

 Top Of Page Change Forum... Civil Aviation Travel, Polls & Prefs Tech/Ops Aviation Hobby Aviation Photography Photography Feedback Trip Reports Military Av & Space Non-Aviation Site Related LIVE Chat Forum Index

Reply To This Topic How Accurate Of Runway Distance Markers?
• Tech/Ops related posts only!
• Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
• No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
• No hostile language or criticizing of others.
• Do not post copyright protected material.
• Use relevant and describing topics.
• DETAILED RULES

 Similar topics: More similar topics...
Runway Distance Markers - When/Why? posted Sat Apr 29 2006 20:56:47 by AeroWesty
No Lines Marking Edge Of Runway At YUL? posted Fri Jul 30 2010 09:08:49 by Evan767
Does A 735 Really Need 2 Miles Of Runway For T/O? posted Sat Jul 3 2010 13:17:39 by c5load
Relative Efficiency Of Runway Configurations posted Thu Feb 21 2008 09:14:20 by Hamfist
Take-off Runway Length Vs Length Of Runway posted Tue Feb 12 2008 15:02:13 by CRJ900
Running Out Of Runway posted Sat Jun 3 2006 21:46:23 by Tarzanboy
How Accurate Is NASA's Foilsim? posted Thu Nov 10 2005 01:48:37 by DfwRevolution
Assignment Of Runway Numbers. posted Sun Feb 6 2005 09:05:27 by JumboJim747
Pilots: How To Determine Runway Stength posted Thu Mar 11 2004 08:41:22 by SailorOrion
How Big Of A Propellor? posted Sun Feb 9 2003 23:00:18 by Airworthy