Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Comparison: P&W GTF Engine Vs. CFM Leap Engine  
User currently offlineTomB From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 79 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 7883 times:

Ernest S. Arvai has written a very good and detailed comparison between the P&W GTF engine and the CFM LEAP engine. Here is the link:

http://airinsight.com/2011/11/09/com...nes-gtf-vs-leap-maintenance-costs/



Here are a few summary comments:

“Engine performance comes from a blend of propulsive efficiency (generated by the fan) and thermal efficiency generated by the core. Roughly 50% of a modern engine performance is dictated by each element. The GTF, with a larger, slower turning fan, has an advantage in propulsive efficiency, and the LEAP, to provide equivalent fuel burn improvement, would need higher thermal efficiency. That would require a hotter burning engine.”

“Airinsight estimates that the PW1000G will have between 1,500-3,000 fewer airfoils, six fewer stages, and about the same number of life limited parts in its configuration when compared to the latest information we’ve obtained on the LEAP.”

“We would expect the GTF to have an advantage in maintenance costs over the LEAP based on two factors – fewer parts and slightly lower (turbine) temperatures.”

We now need Lightsaber to add his expert analysis to this article.

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePolymerPlane From United States of America, joined May 2006, 991 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (3 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 7817 times:

The article sounds like it was written by PW marketing department.


One day there will be 100% polymer plane
User currently offlineMarkC From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 259 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 7765 times:

I will preface this by saying that I do not work on the GTF (given my employer), and will defer to Lightsaber in all areas except my personal areas of expertise (overhaul).

I did not know that CFM was going for a 2 stage HPT. This was one of their maintenance advantages on the CFM over the V was to have a 1 stage HPT vs. 2 for the V. Lower maintenance costs, but, I guess they needed the fuel burn numbers and had to go 2 stage. And, I had no idea they had a 7 stage LPT. This is incredible. Is that true? CFM LPTs are exceptionally robust, but if there ever is an issue with an upstream component, and it creates a cascade effect failure, its going to be an expensive bill for a repair. Hell, a 112 inch PW 4000 has a 7 stage LPT. Incredible for such a small engine. You should see a bill for a 112 inch HPT blade failure that takes out the LPT. A 7 stage LPT has an incredible blade count.

However, the CFM has a great advantage with the composite blades in the fan. They can build the containment case so much lighter with those blades.

Who knows. If GE can deliver on their promise on the temp increase for the core, that is scary news, because they have always been behind PW in metallurgy and coatings. I personally hope/believe that PW can increase the temp later to keep ahead.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Comparison: P&W GTF Engine Vs. CFM Leap Engine
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
A380 Vs 777 Engine Size posted Wed Mar 1 2006 22:43:06 by Okees
Rear Engine Vs. Twin Engine posted Thu Jun 19 2003 22:32:55 by Bigphilnyc
Jet Engine VS. Jet Engine posted Wed Apr 18 2001 03:47:48 by Bryan Becker
A319/A320/A321 IAE Vs CFM Range posted Sat Nov 5 2011 07:05:56 by kmz
Cfm -56 Thrust Vc Cfm Leap-X Thrust posted Tue Dec 21 2010 06:35:31 by parapente
Will The PW1000G Trump The CFM Leap-X? posted Tue Aug 31 2010 07:53:28 by keesje
Overweight Engine-Out Landings: 2 Vs 4 Engines posted Mon Aug 29 2011 07:04:59 by faro
777 Engine Differences--PW Vs GE/RR posted Sat Jun 4 2011 20:24:54 by washingtonian
Engine Mountings Down Vs. Side posted Sun Feb 6 2011 12:06:06 by MadDogJT8D
Should GTF & LeapX Be Forced Into One Engine? posted Fri Sep 3 2010 03:23:28 by faro

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format