Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
747 8F Question  
User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4525 posts, RR: 18
Posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 7953 times:

Perhaps Wilco737 can clear this up !




Looking at the picture of the crew rest area on the upper deck of the new 8F there are only two seats shown on the left side of the upper deck cabin with a bulkhead immediately in front of and behind them.



Has the actual usable space inside this upper deck been reduced this much and if so, what is behind the bulkhead ?



The older freighters with the classic hump had far more space available, very curious.


The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31003 posts, RR: 86
Reply 1, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 7942 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I believe the 747-8F has the same upper deck as the 747-400F (and earlier 747Fs) so it might just be a customer configuration decision.

User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4525 posts, RR: 18
Reply 2, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 7929 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 1):
I believe the 747-8F has the same upper deck as the 747-400F (and earlier 747Fs) so it might just be a customer configuration decision.

I am sure it is, I just wondered what they have done with the space behind that rear bulkhead.



The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offlinelowrider From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 3220 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 7917 times:

Get in a few more tall pallets. Beneath the upper deck, you are limited to 96 inch tall pallets. The further back the upper deck extends, the further aft this restriction extends.


Proud OOTSK member
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25416 posts, RR: 49
Reply 4, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 7905 times:

The upper deck on the -400F is indeed smaller than on the classics.

While I don't know what photo you are looking at, for all the -400 freigthers I've flown, right behind the cabin seats would be the bulk head door that leads to the bunks. Most typically there are 4 beds, double stacked.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31003 posts, RR: 86
Reply 5, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 7885 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 4):
While I don't know what photo you are looking at...

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alberto Sanarlitano



User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 79
Reply 6, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 7815 times:

Quoting Max Q (Thread starter):
Has the actual usable space inside this upper deck been reduced this much and if so, what is behind the bulkhead ?

It's not as bad as you think...look at the lower left corner of the picture in Reply 5. That's a door hinge...that door opens up into a multi-bunk space behind that bulkhead.

Also, if you stand in the position this photo was taken and turn 180 degrees, the fwd bulkhead is much farther forward...the seating area on the right side is much larger than on the left. The forward left side is the galley.

Tom.


User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 9033 posts, RR: 75
Reply 7, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 7807 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting Max Q (Thread starter):
Perhaps Wilco737 can clear this up !

Not really no. No access to the 748F. I guess there will be some beds somewhere on the upper deck for proper sleep during long flights and enlarged crew.

wilco737
  



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4525 posts, RR: 18
Reply 8, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 7772 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 4):

While I don't know what photo you are looking at, for all the -400 freigthers I've flown, right behind the cabin seats would be the bulk head door that leads to the bunks. Most typically there are 4 beds, double stacked.

Ok, that's different to the set up I have seen with -400 pax versions that have a 2 up bunk set up just behind and to the left of the cockpit.



This area is separate and in front of the rest of the upper deck.

Quoting lowrider (Reply 3):


Get in a few more tall pallets. Beneath the upper deck, you are limited to 96 inch tall pallets. The further back the upper deck extends, the further aft this restriction extends.

That makes a lot of sense, is that really the case ?

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 6):

It's not as bad as you think...look at the lower left corner of the picture in Reply 5. That's a door hinge...that door opens up into a multi-bunk space behind that bulkhead.

Also, if you stand in the position this photo was taken and turn 180 degrees, the fwd bulkhead is much farther forward...the seating area on the right side is much larger than on the left. The forward left side is the galley.

Understand, would like to see a picture taken from that aspect.




Overall though, it is surprising how much smaller this upper deck space is compared to the classic (freighter or pax version)



The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offlineCCA From Hong Kong, joined Oct 2002, 836 posts, RR: 14
Reply 9, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 7702 times:

The only difference between the -400F & the -8F is the galley and toilet, they are changed slightly, the seating and bunk arrangement in the "cabin" are the same. The pic above is the same as the -400Fs I've flown.

Obviously a BCF is vastly different.



C152 G115 TB10 CAP10 SR-22 Be76 PA-34 NDN-1T C500 A330-300 A340-300 -600 B747-200F -200SF -400 -400F -400BCF -400ERF -8F
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 79
Reply 10, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 7670 times:

Quoting Max Q (Reply 8):
That makes a lot of sense, is that really the case ?

Yes, there's a lower height restriction under the upper deck. This is why you can load higher cargo through the side door than you can through the nose door.

Quoting Max Q (Reply 8):
Understand, would like to see a picture taken from that aspect.

I tried to find one, no luck so far. I'll keep looking.

Quoting Max Q (Reply 8):
Overall though, it is surprising how much smaller this upper deck space is compared to the classic (freighter or pax version)

If you mean this particular spot on the upper deck, I defer to those with more -400F experience. The overall area of the upper deck is no different on the -400F and the -8F.

Tom.


User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4525 posts, RR: 18
Reply 11, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 7536 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 10):

If you mean this particular spot on the upper deck, I defer to those with more -400F experience. The overall area of the upper deck is no different on the -400F and the -8F.

What I meant was, the usable crew space in the upper deck even with the bunks behind the bulkhead is far less than the older -200 freighter upper deck.



The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offline747classic From Netherlands, joined Aug 2009, 2143 posts, RR: 14
Reply 12, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 7407 times:

On the 747-200F and -200SF the 10 ft. main deck pallet capability was available aft of station 903.
On later produced 747-200F and the 747-400F the inside of the short hump was modified to accept one more row of 10 ft main deck pallets. (until station 777).
Conseq : On early 747-200F, all 747-200SF and -200C (in full cargo configuration) aircraft, the available upper deck space was (slightly) larger then on the last produced 747-200F and all -400F aircraft.

AFAIK the available upperdeck space is identical at the 747-400F and the 747-8F.
747-200F/400F - 10 ft pallet capability


Earlier (larger) upper deck configurations :

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vasco Garcia
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Joe Corrigan



Later (smaller) upper deck configuration (747-200F -747-400F

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vasco Garcia
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jonathan Rankin



[Edited 2011-12-02 04:59:02]


Operating a twin over the ocean, you're always one engine failure from a total emergency.
User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4525 posts, RR: 18
Reply 13, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 7323 times:

Thanks 747Classic for your usual informed input.


And the pictures are worth a thousand words!



The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offline747classic From Netherlands, joined Aug 2009, 2143 posts, RR: 14
Reply 14, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 7237 times:

Here are some pictures from the main cargo deck of an Atlas Air 747-200SF and a 747-400F aircraft.

On the LH picture (747-200SF, looking aft) visible the barrier strap at station 903 (just aft of the green ceiling structure), prohibiting loading cargo over 8 ft high, fwd of this position.

On the RH picture (747-400F, looking aft) clearly visible the same barrier strap but now more FWD, at station 777.
Note : At the 747-400F also at the 10 ft high, aft part of the main-deck full fire protecting lining has been installed, necessary by new regulations.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wojtek Werpachowski
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Craig Murray



And now the 747-8F: as shown at the next picture of a new Cathay freighter , the barrier stap is also located at station 777, so the available upperdeck floor surface must be identical on the 747-400F and the 747-8F.
But each customer can of course select a different internal upperdeck lay-out.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Christian Junker


[Edited 2011-12-03 02:36:10]


Operating a twin over the ocean, you're always one engine failure from a total emergency.
User currently offlineKAUSpilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 1959 posts, RR: 32
Reply 15, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 7158 times:

This is the 747-400F upper deck floor plan and the -8f is nearly identical from what I can tell. Ask me again at this time next year and I'll give you a definite answer.



This is the 747-400 BCF floor plan:



User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4525 posts, RR: 18
Reply 16, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 6928 times:

Thanks Kaus, but where are the crew bunks on the -400 ?


The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offlineKAUSpilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 1959 posts, RR: 32
Reply 17, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 6897 times:

The blue shaded areas indicate crew rest in both diagrams; the bunks are stacked on the BCF and head to head on the -400F (there is a wall separating them at the head).

User currently offlineEYKD From Russia, joined Dec 2006, 197 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 5768 times:

Just in case, one may consider to take a look on to 360-panorama of AirBridge Cargo's 744F upper deck (supernumerary area): http://airbridgecargo.com/boeing747tour/index3.html

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic 747 8F Question
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Changes We Will Ever See A 747-8F/I(ER)? posted Mon Jan 3 2011 14:46:08 by 747400sp
Boeing 747 LAV Question! posted Thu Apr 10 2008 14:45:19 by PILOTALLEN
747 SP Question posted Fri Jul 20 2007 13:35:36 by Max Q
BA 747 Emergency Question posted Tue Mar 13 2007 01:48:01 by HighFlyer9790
747 Dreamlifter Question? posted Sun Mar 4 2007 17:26:55 by Venus6971
Yet Another 747 Door Question posted Fri Jul 16 2004 03:16:13 by SafetyDude
747 Door Question posted Mon Jul 12 2004 19:28:24 by SafetyDude
747 Radome Question posted Thu Mar 18 2004 08:42:00 by Videns
747 Engines Question posted Thu Apr 3 2003 21:32:25 by S.p.a.s.
B-747 Fuel Question posted Mon Oct 21 2002 08:10:34 by Mikeclod

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format