Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
500 Feet Landing Gate, Why 500?  
User currently offlinesmartt1982 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 225 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4073 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Can anyone shed on info on the reasons behind a 500 feet landing gate (1000 in IMC). I am aware of the reasons for having a stabilized approach but is there any particular reason for it being 500.

Can anyone point me towards official documentation that talk about/accidents that have occurred that caused this to be?

Any help/info always greatly appreciated.

Kind Regards

Steve

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinerendezvous From New Zealand, joined May 2001, 515 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 3794 times:

Where I'm instructing we use 300'AGL, but that's in light aircraft which don't go quite as fast. I'm not sure why those particular numbers, I'd say they'd vary depending on operator too.

User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 2884 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3435 times:

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
Can anyone shed on info on the reasons behind a 500 feet landing gate (1000 in IMC). I am aware of the reasons for having a stabilized approach but is there any particular reason for it being 500.

Interesting question. Let me ask a few of our senior guys and pilots to see if anyone knows. We talk a lot about this topic lately with the industry focus on preventing Runway Excursions (which can be caused by not being stable at 500 feet). But I've never heard the reason why they picked 500 ft. I'm curious too. If I find out, I'll post it.

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
Can anyone point me towards official documentation that talk about/accidents that have occurred that caused this to be?

Yeah, as you know many of the current regulations are (unfortunately) brought on by past accidents. The 250 knot limit below 10,000 ft came from the TW Constellation and UA DC-8 mid-air over Staten Island in 1960. The regulations for having a Standby Battery and Standby Instruments came from the UA 727 crash off of LAX in 1969. TCAS was brought on by a number of accidents. PSA 182 and the Aeromexico mid-air near LAX were the final two straws.


User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9402 posts, RR: 27
Reply 3, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3411 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
Can anyone shed on info on the reasons behind a 500 feet landing gate (1000 in IMC). I am aware of the reasons for having a stabilized approach but is there any particular reason for it being 500.

I think several airlines use 1000 or 1500 feet for the minimum altitude at which you must have a stable approach.

Overall, it's probably a compromise between safety and efficiency - you don't want to fly an unstable approach down to the ground, but at the same time, forcing airplanes to be stable and on speed at 10,000 feet will probably slow traffic down quite a bit.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinepilotpip From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 3139 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3330 times:

First, a landing is never assured until the the plane is on the ground. For most airlines that commitment point is the opening of thrust reversers. Until that point, you can go around.

Stabilized approach critera is the determining factor for continuing an approach beyond 500' AGL. The reason: safety. There have been a number of crashes attributed to aircraft being high/fast on final. To prevent this a standard had to be established. This was to be on speed and glide slope at 500 or 1000ft AGL. My airline does 500 for visual approaches and 1000 for instrument approaches but many do 1000 for both and I often do this myself.

This is a big topic of discussion with our various safety initiatives which is one of the few places the union and company work quite well together. It's in all of our interests to focus on potential issues during flight and promote a culture of safety.



DMI
User currently offlinelowrider From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 3220 posts, RR: 10
Reply 5, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3216 times:

Quoting pilotpip (Reply 4):
First, a landing is never assured until the the plane is on the ground.

Speak for yourself. For me, landing is assured at rotation.



Proud OOTSK member
User currently offlineFabo From Slovakia, joined Aug 2005, 1211 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3079 times:

Quoting pilotpip (Reply 4):
This was to be on speed and glide slope at 500 or 1000ft AGL

And engines out of idle, from what I have heard.



The light at the end of tunnel turn out to be a lighted sing saying NO EXIT
User currently offlinepilotpip From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 3139 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2992 times:

Quoting lowrider (Reply 5):

Speak for yourself. For me, landing is assured at rotation.

And every landing is a go around until the T/Rs open. Obviously your superior piloting ability means you've never done one. Get over yourself.

[Edited 2011-12-13 10:55:14]


DMI
User currently offlinelowrider From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 3220 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2890 times:

Quoting pilotpip (Reply 7):
And every landing is a go around until the T/Rs open. Obviously your superior piloting ability means you've never done one. Get over yourself.

Lighten up Francis, its a joke. As in, as soon as I take off, I know I will, at some point, be landing. Most assuredly.



Proud OOTSK member
User currently offlinetb727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1550 posts, RR: 8
Reply 9, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2864 times:

Quoting lowrider (Reply 8):
Lighten up Francis, its a joke. As in, as soon as I take off, I know I will, at some point, be landing. Most assuredly.

Man, I just shot water out my nose, thanks!

We have a perfect record in aviation, haven't left one up there yet.



Too lazy to work, too scared to steal!
User currently offlineFabo From Slovakia, joined Aug 2005, 1211 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (2 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2744 times:

Quoting tb727 (Reply 9):
We have a perfect record in aviation, haven't left one up there yet.

Not like those pesky submariners, eh?  

Nevertheless, lowrider, I did get your point, but it did seem out of place in such a discussion.



The light at the end of tunnel turn out to be a lighted sing saying NO EXIT
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic 500 Feet Landing Gate, Why 500?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Reverse Thrust From Gate: Why Roll Forward? posted Sat Jul 30 2005 02:34:38 by Crownvic
MD-11 Landing Without Center Landing Gear - Why posted Wed Jun 9 2004 13:12:43 by Jorge1812
737s And MD80s Have 2 Pairs Of Landing Lights,why? posted Sat Apr 26 2003 03:53:00 by William
A340-500/600 Landing Gear posted Sun Jan 18 2004 05:48:12 by FrontierA319
Why Do Tugs Pull Aircraft To The Gate In The US? posted Fri Aug 19 2011 23:05:51 by Camohe
Why Go-around After Hard Landing? posted Mon Mar 28 2011 18:59:17 by Kurtjeter
Why Are There No Aural Warnings During Landing? posted Sun Oct 10 2010 11:01:26 by aerobus12
How Bad Is This Damage To EK A340-500? posted Mon Oct 4 2010 10:22:20 by afriwing
Hughes 500 - Regular Tail Versus T-Tail posted Mon Jul 19 2010 15:27:31 by 2H4
747-500, 747-600, 747-700? posted Fri Apr 2 2010 12:59:01 by September11

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format