Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Concrete Vs Asphalt Runways  
User currently offlineapodino From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 4281 posts, RR: 6
Posted (2 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 13378 times:

One thing I have noticed in recent years is that almost all of the new runways being built in the US seem to be Concrete runways. This includes the rebuilt 7R-25L in LAS, the rebuilt 13R-31L at JFK, the new runways that have been built at CLT, CVG, and ORD to name a few. However I also notice BOS continues to use Asphalt to rebuild runways at BOS, even going as far as touting a warm mix asphalt that they use which is more enviornmentally friendly. My thing is, Concrete seems to be better for the environment than Asphalt from what I see. That aside, I notice that all the surface movement areas at BOS are asphalt and there is a lot of cracking that keeps having to be sealed, which I have not seen at airports with Concrete.

So my question is this, why is BOS using Asphalt instead of Concrete, when everyone else seems to be using Concrete, and is one really better than the other? Concrete seems better to me, but BOS still won't use it.

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineB6JFKH81 From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 2891 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (2 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 13368 times:

The two points that immediately come to my mind are:

COST: Concrete is more expensive than asphalt.

TIME: It takes longer to do concrete than asphalt (unless you get pre-made slabs), which means longer down time for the runway, backed up operations at the airport, etc. A good example is the JFK Bay Runway which took months to do in multiple phases, and there were multiple times where JFK went down to SINGLE RUNWAY OPERATIONS. All 3 of the airlines shown in the picture below extended reduced/winter schedules to help reduce the backlog, but that hurt the airlines, and in some cases the reduced flying didn't help at all because you were dealing with only 1 runway.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gerard isaacson



Sometimes all you can do is go the cheap and easy route because you can't afford any other way...either $$-wise or operational-wise.

~H81



"If you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it"
User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10046 posts, RR: 26
Reply 2, posted (2 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 13319 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Some good answers here:

Asphalt Vs. Concrete? (by quadagon Dec 22 2010 in Tech Ops)

There are a few other threads about it as well.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17054 posts, RR: 67
Reply 3, posted (2 years 8 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 13223 times:

It depends on many factors:
- Climate, meaning prevailing temperature and humidity.
- Initial cost.
- Initial construction time.
- Maintenance cost.
- Expected lifetime.

Also, while we tend to think of asphalt and concrete as "static" technologies, they are still being developed, meaning new compounds and so forth. In other words, which one is correct for a certain application can change over time.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineNorthwest727 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 491 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (2 years 8 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 13007 times:

Asphalt also degrades faster than concrete over time due to 1000ºF/538ºC jet exhaust being blasted over it constantly. I have personally seen the effect while interning at a major class B airport, the runway started having "ripples" all over the place that needed to be replaced, especially around the touchdown markers (where aircraft are flaring mostly).

So what I have learned:

Concrete: Higher initial cost, lower maintenance cost
Asphalt: Lower initial cost, higher maintenance cost


User currently offlineJayinKitsap From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 769 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 12145 times:

It's cost, local practice, and technology. Also, the economics of one v the other change with the market.

a) Asphalt pavements are more flexible, but the wheel load transmits to the native earth basically in a pyramid through the road base. A given amount of movement in the subgrade can be tolerated in asphalt that would crack concrete.
b) Asphalt pavements on typical city roadways is around 4 inches, main roads and highways are thicker, typically 6 to 8 inches. Taxiways are similar, major runways are 10 to 12 inches. As there is about 5% oil in asphalt, cost is significant.
c) Concrete has improved a lot over the last 40 years, reinforced concrete can spread the load out a significant distance to reduce the loads to the underlying soil. Also, less joints and better levelness.
d) An unseen thing is the addition of reinforced plastic grids in the gravel base below. These geogrids make the subgrade much stronger, allowing a thinner pavement, both concrete and asphalt.

Currently, concrete is probably the preferred material for runways, with a tossup for taxiways, and preferred for aprons. Both take a lot of energy to produce, with the cement making process using using coal vs oil.


User currently offlineNBGSkyGod From United States of America, joined May 2004, 819 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (2 years 8 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 11739 times:

It has a lot to do with the New England climate, there are very few runways up here that are completely concrete. There are a few that are mixed with concrete portions, but for the most part its all asphalt. The main reason for this is the fact that asphalt is more flexible in changing temperatures where concrete is much less.


"I use multi-billion dollar military satellite systems to find tupperware in the woods."
User currently offlineTupolev160 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 9580 times:

I also noticed some airports using Asphalt/Concrete or "Grooved concrete" runways? What should those mean? Also, in ex-USSR all airports seem to be made with concrete runways. Could concrete be more suitable for extreme weather?

User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 9538 times:

Quoting Tupolev160 (Reply 7):

I also noticed some airports using Asphalt/Concrete or "Grooved concrete" runways? What should those mean?

Grooved concrete is what it sounds like...concrete with grooves cut in it. This helps with wet weather traction.

Some runways are a mix of asphalt and concrete, for example Glasgow Industrial. If you look at it on Google maps you can clearly see the light concrete and dark asphalt sections.

Quoting Tupolev160 (Reply 7):
Also, in ex-USSR all airports seem to be made with concrete runways. Could concrete be more suitable for extreme weather?

Concrete is generally more durable.

Tom.


User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8847 posts, RR: 24
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 9440 times:

Quoting Tupolev160 (Reply 7):
I also noticed some airports using Asphalt/Concrete or "Grooved concrete" runways? What should those mean? Also, in ex-USSR all airports seem to be made with concrete runways. Could concrete be more suitable for extreme weather?

Soviet-era runways were horrible - the concrete slabs being uneven and poorly joined. A couple come to mind in particular, Poltava and Alma Ata - the first time we landed on those I thought we were crashing!

I remember seeing at various airports in Europe, particularly where they have only one or two runways, that they are set up for constant renewal. In Geneva, for instance (only one runway), every night they have a big rig that goes out and replaces a few slabs every night. As long as you have a few hours per day, you don't need to shut down the runway for 6 months to redo it.



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Concrete Vs Asphalt Runways
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Asphalt Vs. Concrete? posted Wed Dec 22 2010 22:44:23 by quadagon
Concrete V.S Asphalt: Heavy AC Issues? posted Wed Mar 21 2007 16:22:09 by CF188A
Asphalt And Concrete Paving posted Mon Jun 5 2006 08:30:02 by Kaitak744
Flight Modes:Managed Vs Selected posted Mon Jan 9 2012 08:10:06 by Nomik
Tilt Wing Vs. Tilt Rotor Vtol Aircraft posted Mon Jan 9 2012 05:05:35 by flyingturtle
Landing Short On Short Runways posted Fri Jan 6 2012 02:15:27 by faro
A320 Vs. A319/321 Spoiler #3 posted Fri Dec 16 2011 06:16:47 by flyinTLow
Display Windows FCU Vs MCP posted Fri Dec 16 2011 02:47:43 by Nomik
Dual-NDB Vs Back-ILS posted Wed Dec 14 2011 06:14:48 by Nomik
Senior Vs Junior Cabin Crew Etc. posted Wed Dec 14 2011 03:14:59 by TravelsUK
Asphalt Vs. Concrete? posted Wed Dec 22 2010 22:44:23 by quadagon
Concrete V.S Asphalt: Heavy AC Issues? posted Wed Mar 21 2007 16:22:09 by CF188A
Asphalt And Concrete Paving posted Mon Jun 5 2006 08:30:02 by Kaitak744
JT9D Vs PW4000 posted Thu Jan 19 2012 14:44:24 by Reggaebird
Flight Modes:Managed Vs Selected posted Mon Jan 9 2012 08:10:06 by Nomik
Tilt Wing Vs. Tilt Rotor Vtol Aircraft posted Mon Jan 9 2012 05:05:35 by flyingturtle
Landing Short On Short Runways posted Fri Jan 6 2012 02:15:27 by faro
A320 Vs. A319/321 Spoiler #3 posted Fri Dec 16 2011 06:16:47 by flyinTLow
Display Windows FCU Vs MCP posted Fri Dec 16 2011 02:47:43 by Nomik

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format