LY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 9 Posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1223 times:
Recently, my local airport (YQG) converted one of it's 3 runways, 02/20, to a taxiway (twy F). I was wondering what could be the reason for that. What would make an airport to make such a decision? The only reason I could think of was that it might be cheaper to maintain a taxiway than a runway over the years. Is that true? Any other ideas?
Mr Spaceman From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 2787 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1170 times:
Perhaps the runway was in need of repairs or even re-surfacing and the airport authority felt that the cost was to much, compared to the need.
Has the volumn of traffic at YQG been slowing down for some time? Thus, less need for a 3rd runway...and like you mentioned, a lower runway maintanance cost.
What is the length of runway 02/20, and what is it's surface made of? These could also be factors. I don't know what is cheaper to maintain...a concrete runway or a paved one. Plus, if one of them had to go for budget reasons, etc, I'd think it would be the shortest or less active one.
LY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1146 times:
02/20 was the shortest and narrowest of YQG's runways, at 3833'x100'(plus paved shoulders of about 30's on each side). The other two runways are 12/30 (5150'x150'), and 07/25 (recently lengthened to 9000'x200', 25 is the only ILS equipped rwy at YQG). Runway 25 is used most of the time, due to wind direction, it's size, and convenience for arriving a/c. Despite the fact that the wind is usually from the WSW, rwy 30 is used often for departures of commercial a/c, probably due to the fact it requires the shortest taxiing distance from the terminal. When rwy 02/20 was still active, it was used mostly as a taxiway to connect the terminal and GA areas of the airport to rwy 07/25 (it has no parallel taxiway), and on occasion it was used for GA a/c.
Here's a pic of YQG:
You can see the terminal in the southern edge of the airport (the big ramp), adjacent to rwy 12/30, rwy 02-20/twy F crosses rwy 12/30 at an almost right angle, and rwy 07/25 is at the north (that's an older image, from when 07/25 was still 7850' long).
Kcle From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 686 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1137 times:
They did that at CLE too. Runway 18/36 was permanently closed, and is a taxiway now. The funny thing is that most of the runway markings, stripes, lines, etc., are still on the runway, and all of the 18/36 intersection signs are still there. I've even heard a pilot ask the tower if 18/36 is open, and tower said, nope, closed permanently.
I can figure out why 18/36 was closed, as it was third longest out of 4 runways, being 6415 x 150 feet, but it didn't have an ILS, as there was no room for the ILS equipment. Does anyone have any info on 18/36, like what aircraft used it, when it was built, etc?