Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
How Far Could Such A DC-8 Fly...  
User currently offlinehappy-flier From Canada, joined Dec 1999, 299 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4246 times:

As I was sitting here, thinking about the new PW geared turbofan and its variants, I wondered:

"What if they took a DC-8-73, swapped the CFMs for four PW1521Gs, added some winglets to it, and did some flight tests... How far would it fly on a full fuel load?"

The thrust class of the PW1521G is stated as 21,000–23,300 lbf. This would correspond nearly evenly with what the current CFMs put out.

Any wild guesses as to how far a Stretch Eight could go with these newest engines?

What would we call it: DC-8-83 ... or DC-8-2013?  


May the wind be always at your back . . . except during takeoff & landing.
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineprebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6453 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 4022 times:

It's of course pure speculation since it sure ain't gonna happen. But:

1. It may go nowhere at all since the wings may not have been designed to accommodate the heavier weight of the PWs.

2. At least the outer engines will for ground clearance have to be raised somewhat higher on the wing. That will give a drag penalty which reduces the range.

3. The heavier weight of the engines will reduce combined fuel and payload weight. Due to altered weight distribution it may affect max fuel load downwards. Maybe not.

Apart from that, present day CFM56-5Bs are a lot more efficient than the 25 years old CFM56-2 on DC-8-73. And we are told that the new PW is some 16% better than the -5B. So ferry range will surely be increased substantially. (As well as 20+ years old -5As on old 320s are no match for present day -5Bs - the -2 and the -5A are in fact a lot more similar than -5A and -5B).

But with a meaningful payload, due to increased OEW, max fuel load will be reduced substantially. Whether that will mean increased, unchanged or decreased range will demand a qualified analysis. But sure it will be more fuel efficient.

At the end of the day, re-engining an airliner is a lot more than just bolting on another blower.

Therefore the 320neo, which is going to take to the sky with the new PWs, will be modified substantially. Wing structure reinforced, and a whole lot of other changes to allow an increased MTOW as compensation for the increased OEW. And it is highly unlikely that any non-neo 320 will ever in the future be upgraded to 320neo. If viable, that would make a lot more sense than doing the same to the DC-8-73.



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlinehappy-flier From Canada, joined Dec 1999, 299 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3822 times:

Thanks for the great reply - much appreciated.

I agree that the DC-8 is an ancient breed whose innovative potential is at an end... though I admit I would love to see a new narrow-bodied twin designed for the kind of intercontinental flight that the 787 does, making use of composite and geared turbofan technologies. Time will tell.



May the wind be always at your back . . . except during takeoff & landing.
User currently offlinermm From Australia, joined Feb 2001, 524 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 3469 times:

I've wondered what the DC8 & 707 would be like with the CFM56-3. Much the same thrust class as the -2 but lighter, smaller diameter frontal area (reduced drag) and more ground clearance. Then throw in the advanced upgrade kit for better SFC.

User currently offlinefrancoflier From France, joined Oct 2001, 3766 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 3451 times:

I am guesing a 20-25% fuel burn improvement, which would very roughly translate in that much extra range...

Now, the real question would be: How far would an A343 go with PW G engines. But we don't want to open that can of worm again, do we...

  



Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit posting...
User currently offlinemayor From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 10432 posts, RR: 14
Reply 5, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3212 times:

Quoting francoflier (Reply 4):
I am guesing a 20-25% fuel burn improvement, which would very roughly translate in that much extra range...

When the DL DC-8-61s were converted to -71, we understood that the company was very happy with the better fuel consumption, somewhere in the vicinity of 27% better than the -61.



"A committee is a group of the unprepared, appointed by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary"----Fred Allen
User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4682 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2687 times:

If you hang GTFs onto the wing of a KC-135A instead of the J57 turbojets...  


Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineflipdewaf From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2006, 1574 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2677 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting francoflier (Reply 4):
I am guesing a 20-25% fuel burn improvement, which would very roughly translate in that much extra range...

Now, the real question would be: How far would an A343 go with PW G engines. But we don't want to open that can of worm again, do we...

But it will have 4 engines so by default will not be as good as a T7, this is what I have learnerised from A.net  

Fred


User currently offlineprebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6453 posts, RR: 54
Reply 8, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2227 times:

Quoting francoflier (Reply 4):
Now, the real question would be: How far would an A343 go with PW G engines. But we don't want to open that can of worm again, do we...

No problem, since here we are actually talking about something which might be technically realistic. (Technically realistic, but hardly economically realistic).

The CFM56-5C4 on the A343 is some 4,000 lbs (or some 75%) heavier than the CFM56-2 on the DC-8-7x. That is much more in line with a relevant PW G version, so contrary to the DC-8 the A343 would hardly need much rebuilding of the wing structure.

However, the efficiency gain on the A343 would be a lot smaller since its CFM56-5C is already a lot more efficient than the CFM56-2. It's an entirely different beast, much larger, much more powerful and efficient - and developed 15 years later.

Differences are a lot more than scaling. They don't even share the same number of compressor and turbine stages.

(I sometimes have the feeling that some a.netters imagine that CFM56 is mostly one engine design. There are similarities, like on Ford engines whether they are V8, V6 or 4 inline. But take for instance CFM56-5B (A320) and CFM56-5C (A340): That little suffix - B or C - means that the former is 5,300 lbs of metal while the latter tips the scale at 8,800 lbs).



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic How Far Could Such A DC-8 Fly...
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Far Do They Fly For Maintenance? posted Wed Oct 14 2009 06:16:12 by An225
How Do You Rotate A DC-9? posted Tue Jul 13 2010 12:49:24 by Tarzanboy
How Far Away Can One See From A Aircraft? posted Sat Jun 12 2010 12:57:31 by B747forever
How Far Did I Drop? posted Fri Nov 23 2007 12:57:18 by ThreeFourThree
How Did Spantax Afford To Fly CV990s In The 80's? posted Mon Sep 17 2007 21:53:57 by Happy-flier
Airlines Meals, How Far In Advance Are They Made? posted Tue Jul 17 2007 18:35:00 by Readytotaxi
How Do You Make Time Fly By On The Flt Deck? posted Mon Dec 18 2006 23:02:51 by INNflight
Building A New Runway: How Far From Buildings? posted Tue Aug 15 2006 22:08:36 by GodBless
How Many Times Can A Pilot Fly A Plane In 1 Day? posted Fri Aug 5 2005 08:42:26 by Palladium
Embraer 130+ Seats, How Far? posted Fri Jun 24 2005 00:24:29 by Bongo

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format