Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Ultimate Load Vs Max Weights  
User currently offlineflipdewaf From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2006, 1574 posts, RR: 1
Posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1958 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I started a thread about wing load questions several months ago and I have a few more questions but thought I'd start a new thread rather than dig up the old one.

I remember from my uni days (only 4/5 years ago) that the wing structure was largely based on MZFW and the 2.5G turn with the 1.5 load factor.

I realise that these tests are largely to test the validity of the modelling methods but is there any chance these can be used to modify the useable weights. I'll use the A350 as an example as this is the next big jet to undergo this test.

MZFW is 192000kg, if the ultimate load testing on the wings went to 156% before breaking would airbus be able to say that the wing is good for 199680kg? Obviously other components do rely on weights and loads so all others would have to pass too or is it just good for the weight to which it has been designed i.e 192t?

Thanks,

Fred

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 1, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1841 times:

Quoting flipdewaf (Thread starter):
I remember from my uni days (only 4/5 years ago) that the wing structure was largely based on MZFW and the 2.5G turn with the 1.5 load factor.

Depending on the design, it may be MTOW or MZFW, and 2.5g x 1.5. Whichever is more limiting will be the test point (it depends on the MZFW/MTOW spread).

Quoting flipdewaf (Thread starter):
I realise that these tests are largely to test the validity of the modelling methods but is there any chance these can be used to modify the useable weights.

Yes, absolutely, this is a normal occurrence.

Quoting flipdewaf (Thread starter):
MZFW is 192000kg, if the ultimate load testing on the wings went to 156% before breaking would airbus be able to say that the wing is good for 199680kg?

Yes.

Quoting flipdewaf (Thread starter):
Obviously other components do rely on weights and loads so all others would have to pass too or is it just good for the weight to which it has been designed i.e 192t?

No, you can go beyond. This is partly how you can get increased weights without re-doing the static tests.

Tom.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Ultimate Load Vs Max Weights
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
777 Wing Ultimate Load Test Photos/Video posted Tue Aug 29 2006 00:31:30 by 2H4
Technical Data (range With Max Load) Of AI's 74D posted Thu Nov 4 2004 16:50:56 by MrNiji
Max Trust Vs Mtow posted Sun Jan 11 2004 20:48:09 by Thvgjp
Bell 430 Landing Gear Vs S-76 Landing Gear posted Sat Mar 3 2012 11:54:17 by PC12Fan
PW127M Vs. PW150A posted Sat Feb 25 2012 08:43:14 by bjorn14
Exit Signs On Boeing Vs. Airbus Aircraft posted Tue Feb 14 2012 14:57:49 by 1337Delta764
Take Off Run Vs Altitude. Rule Of Thumb? posted Sat Feb 11 2012 16:41:57 by a380900
JT9D Vs PW4000 posted Thu Jan 19 2012 14:44:24 by Reggaebird
Concrete Vs Asphalt Runways posted Thu Jan 19 2012 11:05:44 by apodino
Vscf On 737 MAX? posted Fri Jan 13 2012 18:40:39 by 1337Delta764

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format