Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Regular Descent Vs Steep Descent  
User currently offlineaerotech777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2009, 67 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 5151 times:

Hi,

a) What are the advantages and the disadvantages of these 2 descents?

b) Is the angle of regular descent 3 degree (same as in approach)?

c) What’s the angle of steep descent? Is there a limit for this angle?

d) Is it possible to use steep descent in normal flight (no emergency descent)?

e) Is it possible to use steep approach in normal landing?

Feedback appreciated
Regards

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 1, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 5043 times:

Quoting aerotech777 (Thread starter):
b) Is the angle of regular descent 3 degree (same as in approach)?

Generally not. Regular descent is idle engines/clean configuration. As you change configuration coming in to land the regular descent angle will steepen (drag increases with flap and gear).

Quoting aerotech777 (Thread starter):

c) What’s the angle of steep descent? Is there a limit for this angle?

There's no angle, it's defined by speed (Vmo/Mmo). There's no limit, although high angles will be transient because you'll accelerate too quickly.

Quoting aerotech777 (Thread starter):
d) Is it possible to use steep descent in normal flight (no emergency descent)?

Yes, although it's not normal procedure.

Quoting aerotech777 (Thread starter):
e) Is it possible to use steep approach in normal landing?

Yes but, again, not normal procedure.

Tom.


User currently offlinewoodreau From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 981 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4873 times:

Quoting aerotech777 (Thread starter):
b) Is the angle of regular descent 3 degree (same as in approach)?

On the aircraft I fly, an idle descent in a clean configuration will result in a 3500-3800ft/min descent at M0.81 which is about a 4.0-4.2 degree descent. As constraints are imposed (like a 250kt speed limit), you'll leave the thrust levers at idle and slow from M.81 to 250kts by reducing vertical speed to like 500-1,000ft/min depending on how quickly you want to decelerate. Then resume the descent once you've decelerated.

Quoting aerotech777 (Thread starter):
d) Is it possible to use steep descent in normal flight (no emergency descent)?

One place where it might be appropriate to use a steeper descent than normal is going into Santa Barbara. LA Center typically keeps you high to keep you clear of the LA basin arrivals, crossing FIM at FL240, then after crossing FIM at FL240, they clear you to cross KWANG at 9,000ft and hand you off to SoCal approach. Now you have 30 miles to lose 15,000ft. Normally we plan a descent to lose 10,000ft in 30 miles (normal 3-1 rule). Our technique going into Santa Barbara (without having to get descent vectors) is to cross FIM at 24000 as slow as you can go - 210kts, then upon receiving the descent clearance, idle, speed brakes out, and accelerate from 210 to Vmo of 330kts in the descent. It results in about a 6,000-7,500ft/min descent rate, until it's time to decelerate back down to 250kts to go below 10,000ft.

Quoting aerotech777 (Thread starter):
e) Is it possible to use steep approach in normal landing?

One place you might use a steeper approach is into Aspen. It's still not steep but it is a steeper approach than normal. You're looking at a 1,200-1,500 ft/min descent from the final approach fix to the point where you intercept the VASI for a visual landing onto 15 where you transition to a normal descent rate. A normal 3 degree glideslope angle will result in a 750-800ft/min descent (Aspen does not have a glideslope). For the Aspen approach, we prebrief that until we get within 500ft of the touchdown zone elevation, we ignore the GPWS "sink rate" alert as that is normal on the approach and that we may exceed the 1000ft/min descent rate inside 1000ft which is normally a mandatory go around as the 1000ft/min descent inside 1000ft AGL is a non-stabilized approach. We don't ignore the sinkrate alert, we just respond with "Noted" instead of "Correcting." The only GPWS alert we respond to is the "terrain, terrain, pull up" one.



Bonus animus sit, ab experientia. Quod salvatum fuerit de malis usu venit judicium.
User currently offlinemandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6590 posts, RR: 75
Reply 3, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4817 times:

Quoting aerotech777 (Thread starter):
a) What are the advantages and the disadvantages of these 2 descents?

Comfort and economy.
Steep descent = cruise for longer, and need energy to shed.
Normal descent = cruise as far as you need to, and idle it down... no excess energy to shed

Quoting aerotech777 (Thread starter):
b) Is the angle of regular descent 3 degree (same as in approach)?

Using the rule of thumb 3nm per 1000ft, about 3.15degs...but that's net trajectory, not actual... see woodreau's reply.

Quoting aerotech777 (Thread starter):
c) What’s the angle of steep descent? Is there a limit for this angle?

There's a net trajectory angle, but that depends on the situation... and the limits are Vmo and Mmo, so it's really a curved trajectory (like normal descent too!   

Quoting aerotech777 (Thread starter):
d) Is it possible to use steep descent in normal flight (no emergency descent)?
e) Is it possible to use steep approach in normal landing?

How steep is steep?
And which method? Drop like a rock (Vmo/MMo, idle, speedbrakes), or leaf-ing it down (full flaps, gear down, idle, flap limit speed)?   
Bear in mind, rock method or leaf method, both are uncomfortable for the pax. Rock method has additional risks of overspeeding to the final. Leaf method has a risk of not adding power early enough (otherwise, U'll fall faster when you pull up!). Both, are just "nice to knows", not for normal ops. Besides, you got additional maintenance costs thanks to those "fun" methods!   

Mandala499



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineKaiarahi From Canada, joined Jul 2009, 2821 posts, RR: 27
Reply 4, posted (1 year 11 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 4606 times:

It's difficult (impossible) to tell actual descent rates from the pax cabin, but some FRA approaches seem to have steep descents (extended use of speedbrakes).


Note à moi-même - il faut respecter les cons.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Regular Descent Vs Steep Descent
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Flashing No Smoking Signs On Initial Descent posted Mon Nov 28 2011 09:35:27 by 1337Delta764
Vnav Descent Managment posted Wed Sep 15 2010 03:43:56 by smartt1982
How Can We Maintain A Constant Rate Of Descent? posted Mon Apr 19 2010 13:26:52 by KELPkid
747 "classic" Descent Mode posted Fri Jan 1 2010 11:10:27 by Oli
Calculating Top Of Descent (TOD) posted Sun Dec 20 2009 21:19:15 by Wardialer
What Determines Top Of Descent? posted Mon Dec 7 2009 05:52:08 by Jgarrido
Global 5000 Vnav Path Descent Characteristics posted Mon Aug 3 2009 14:12:54 by 9V-SPJ
Continuous Descent Approach CDA Is Annoying! posted Sat Jul 4 2009 10:55:16 by OD-BWH
Descent Rates On Landing: When Could Damage Occur? posted Wed Sep 3 2008 11:23:17 by Kaitak
Beech A 36 On Descent posted Sat Jun 7 2008 04:42:04 by Lenbrazil
Continuous Descent Approach CDA Is Annoying! posted Sat Jul 4 2009 10:55:16 by OD-BWH
Descent Rates On Landing: When Could Damage Occur? posted Wed Sep 3 2008 11:23:17 by Kaitak
747 "classic" Descent Mode posted Fri Jan 1 2010 11:10:27 by Oli

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format