Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Jets Versus Prop And Open Rotor  
User currently offlinesmartt1982 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 225 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 4 months 4 days ago) and read 2571 times:

What is the main reason that jets are better than props at high alt/high speed?.

Is it purely down to the fact that the props will encounter issues with the tips of the blades becoming inefficient at higher speed or more to do with the extra power required at the shaft as TAS increases.(power required = Drag x TAS), why does this not affect jets?.

My understanding is that jets produce a constant thrust and so at a constant IAS thrust required is the same.

With props the thrust is being produced from shaft power so even at a constant IAS, the TAS is increasing so more power is required at the shaft to produce the same thrust at the prop, why does not affect jets?

How are these issues overcome considering that some companies are trying to push open rotor technology, is there not the same issue to be resolved?

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 1, posted (2 years 4 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2504 times:

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):

What is the main reason that jets are better than props at high alt/high speed?

Jets are ducted so they can generate a higher pressure rise across the engine.

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
Is it purely down to the fact that the props will encounter issues with the tips of the blades becoming inefficient at higher speed or more to do with the extra power required at the shaft as TAS increases.(power required = Drag x TAS), why does this not affect jets?.

The tip loses do affect jets but not nearly as badly (since the fan case shrouds the fan). Jets have exactly the same power requirements (drag x TAS for steady flight).

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
My understanding is that jets produce a constant thrust and so at a constant IAS thrust required is the same.

They do not produce the same thrust; jet thrust falls off with altitude just like props due to the decreasing density of the air. They're not as sensitive to thrust as a function of airspeed though.

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
With props the thrust is being produced from shaft power so even at a constant IAS, the TAS is increasing so more power is required at the shaft to produce the same thrust at the prop, why does not affect jets?

It does. Modern high bypass turbofans produce most of their thrust from shaft power to the fan. It's usually better to think of a modern engine as a ducted turbofan rather than an actual jet.

Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
How are these issues overcome considering that some companies are trying to push open rotor technology, is there not the same issue to be resolved?

The same issues are there; open rotors use much higher solidity fans and much fancier blade shapes to try to mitigate the problems.

Tom.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Jets Versus Prop And Open Rotor
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
A320 & Boeing 737 Successor, Open Rotor? posted Thu Jul 16 2009 14:22:13 by Keesje
Next Gen NB To Be Designed For Fan Or Open Rotor? posted Mon Nov 3 2008 05:52:50 by Art
GE, Nasa To Reunite On Open Rotor Wind-tunnel Test posted Mon Oct 27 2008 01:15:24 by Aviationbuff
Fly Prop And Jet. posted Tue Apr 27 2004 09:24:04 by QIguy24
Private Jets And Traffic Control posted Wed Oct 28 2009 16:12:41 by WROORD
Turbo-jets And Rain posted Sun Apr 6 2008 18:43:18 by Sprout5199
DeHavilland Comet: Centrifugal And Axial Flow Jets posted Sun Jan 6 2008 17:30:40 by Blackbird
Afterburning Jets And NOx Emissions posted Mon Jan 8 2007 01:18:17 by Blackbird
Converting Props To Jets And Vice-versa posted Thu Oct 5 2006 18:47:56 by DIJKKIJK
Sudden Interest In SST And RAM Jets posted Fri Jun 23 2006 04:44:41 by Bhill

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format