Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
757 And Speed  
User currently offlineflylku From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 810 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 4363 times:

Crossed the Atlantic today on UA 127 (DUB-IAD), a 757. About an hour west of DUB is noticed an AF 77W overtaking us at a pretty good clip. I think we were at 380 and he must have been 360. He stayed in view for no more than two minutes so I am guessing he had a 20 kts speed advantage on us. Later, over Canada, a UA 767-400 passed us from below with the same speed differential.

I thought, with the exception of the 737, the Boeings all cruised at around the same mach number. It looks like I was wrong.

Also, what other overtakes have others experienced over the last year or so? Who are the slow pokes and who are the speed demons.

Finally, how is spacing over the Atlantic handled with regards to speed?


...are we there yet?
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinepoLOT From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2210 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 4297 times:

Quoting flylku (Thread starter):
Also, what other overtakes have others experienced over the last year or so? Who are the slow pokes and who are the speed demons.

Typical cruising speeds:

737NG: 0.78 Mach (Older 737s are slightly slower)
747: 0.84-0.855 depending on version (Classics are slower, -8 slightly faster than -400)
757: 0.80
767: 0.80
777: 0.84
787: 0.85

A300: 0.78
A310: 0.80
A320: 0.78
A330/A340: 0.82
A350: 0.85 (Obviously an estimate)
A380: 0.85 (It might be 0.855, not sure exactly)

Obviously the actual cruise speed will differ depending on the flight, operator and specific conditions, with the plane sometimes traveling faster or slower but the list gives you a general idea of where today's airplane's speed fall.


User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 3097 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 4276 times:

The 777 cruises at about .84 Mach. The 767 and 757 at about .80 IIRC. I would expect the 77W to overtake you but not the 767-400.

You were incorrect that all Boeing's cruise at the same mach number. The 747 is the fastest at around .87; 787 at about .85; 777 at about .83-.84 and the 757 and 767 at about .80.

The 777 is also much faster than the A340-200/-300. I had the opposite experience in a AA 777 after leaving JFK. I could look down and see this A340 with a purple tail come into view; pass under us backwards; and then drop out of sight behind us. We overtook it like it was standing still; and I'm sure we arrived in LHR at least 40 minutes earlier.


User currently offlineAADC10 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2092 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 4179 times:

Quoting poLOT (Reply 1):
Typical cruising speeds:

737NG: 0.78 Mach (Older 737s are slightly slower)
747: 0.84-0.855 depending on version (Classics are slower, -8 slightly faster than -400)
757: 0.80
767: 0.80
777: 0.84
787: 0.85

A300: 0.78
A310: 0.80
A320: 0.78
A330/A340: 0.82
A350: 0.85 (Obviously an estimate)
A380: 0.85 (It might be 0.855, not sure exactly)

Do most airlines still cruise at those "typical" speeds? Several airlines have mentioned that they cruise at slightly less than they used to in order to save fuel. Is that a load of bunk? Would the aircraft descend at cruise trim if they were below typical speed?


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12150 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 4181 times:

The B-764 could have been on a much shorter great circle routing, and that's why it passed you. Also, the headwinds at FL-380 and FL-390 could have been 20 knots, or so faster (stronger) than the headwinds at FL-350 or FL-360.

User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25457 posts, RR: 22
Reply 5, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4091 times:

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 2):
The 777 cruises at about .84 Mach. The 767 and 757 at about .80 IIRC. I would expect the 77W to overtake you but not the 767-400.

Look at the block times of DL 764s LHR-JFK. They're the longest of all flights in that competitive market (about 20 daily nonstops). DL is the only 767 operator on that route and their block times are up to 40 minutes longer than other carriers departing about the same times using 744s and 777s. DL is the only carrier with block times of 8 hrs+ LHR-JFK.

Example:

BA177 (744) LHR 1300 JFK 1530 Block time 7:30
DL6 (764) LHR 1305 JFK 1615 Block time 8:10


User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10047 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3933 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 4):
The B-764 could have been on a much shorter great circle routing, and that's why it passed you.

Not if it was visible from the thread starter's airplane! At close range, speed differences will play a MUCH larger role than any great circle differences. Besides which, they may not have been on the same route.

Winds could certainly have played a factor, though I don't know why the 757 wouldn't try and take advantage of them. Perhaps not enough of a gain to offset the higher fuel burn at lower altitude for their weight?

I was also surprised to read that your aircraft was at FL380 after only an hour of flight. Granted, I don't really know the real performance of various airplanes, but does anyone know if that's reasonable for a 757 on DUB-IAD?



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineflylku From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 810 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3865 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 6):
I was also surprised to read that your aircraft was at FL380 after only an hour of flight. Granted, I don't really know the real performance of various airplanes, but does anyone know if that's reasonable for a 757 on DUB-IAD?

Honestly I think we were at 360 that early in the flight and 380 as a final. When I saw AF I was fumbling for my tablet to video him passing us and I never looked at the flight map after that.

I think the second sighting was a UA 767-400 (do they run them TATL? If not it was Delta) and it was definitely on the same track as we were. It looked just like AF passing us just a bit smaller.

I had not thought about differences between winds aloft although the sightings were identical and five house apart.

My take away is that the 757 is slower than I thought.



...are we there yet?
User currently offlinepoLOT From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2210 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3824 times:

Quoting flylku (Reply 7):
I think the second sighting was a UA 767-400 (do they run them TATL? If not it was Delta) and it was definitely on the same track as we were. It looked just like AF passing us just a bit smaller.

UA runs the 764 TATL all the time. Are you sure that it was a 764 and not a 772? I don't know how good of a look you got, and the two are similar lengths (the 772 is only 8 feet longer).


User currently offlineflylku From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 810 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3698 times:

Quoting poLOT (Reply 8):
UA runs the 764 TATL all the time. Are you sure that it was a 764 and not a 772? I don't know how good of a look you got, and the two are similar lengths (the 772 is only 8 feet longer).

I had a pretty good look; enough that I thought I could make out the blended winglets and I am fairly certain of the paint scheme also. I just did not know they were using them on the Atlantic so I second guessed myself.



...are we there yet?
User currently offlineSmittyOne From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3663 times:

Quoting flylku (Reply 9):
I had a pretty good look; enough that I thought I could make out the blended winglets and I am fairly certain of the paint scheme also. I just did not know they were using them on the Atlantic so I second guessed myself.

The 767-400ER has raked wingtips instead of winglets. So the mystery continues  
Quoting flylku (Reply 7):
My take away is that the 757 is slower than I thought.

I'm not convinced that it is specifically a 757 issue here, especially if you're saying a 767 passed you. Your flight might have been using a different cost index in the FMC or following slower traffic at that FL.


User currently offlineunited319 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 523 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3609 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Could it be that the 757 was cruising at a lower speed to conserve fuel? Maybe you guys were only set at .78 or .79. I know it can make DUB-IAD comfortably but TATL is still a longer hike on that aircraft. Also the winds yesterday I believe weren't too bad heading westbound.


It's Time To Fly
User currently offlineflylku From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 810 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3579 times:

Quoting united319 (Reply 11):
Could it be that the 757 was cruising at a lower speed to conserve fuel? Maybe you guys were only set at .78 or .79. I know it can make DUB-IAD comfortably but TATL is still a longer hike on that aircraft. Also the winds yesterday I believe weren't too bad heading westbound.

Also an interesting thought. We arrived on-time so it sounds like they flew it as planned and maybe that calls for a lower mach number than say IAD-SFO.



...are we there yet?
User currently offlineflyhossd From United States of America, joined Nov 2009, 893 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 3542 times:

Quoting flylku (Reply 7):

My take away is that the 757 is slower than I thought.
Quoting united319 (Reply 11):
Could it be that the 757 was cruising at a lower speed to conserve fuel? Maybe you guys were only set at .78 or .79. I know it can make DUB-IAD comfortably but TATL is still a longer hike on that aircraft. Also the winds yesterday I believe weren't too bad heading westbound.

Mach .78 isn't as uncommon on a 757 as some seem to think. I'd say the majority of my 757 Atlantic crossings were at that speed. The 757 is capable of higher speeds, but why "spend" the fuel if you're running on time?

And if Shanwick or Gander need a faster speed for the Atlantic crossing (for traffic separation), your clearance would state as much.



My statements do not represent my former employer or my current employer and are my opinions only.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic 757 And Speed
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Gusty Conditions And Speed Indications posted Thu Dec 10 2009 15:22:44 by Skysurfer
Airbus Pilots Only: Going Below F And S Speed posted Thu Nov 20 2008 02:24:16 by Airbus-Insider
Captain Who Flies The 757 And 737 posted Tue Sep 9 2008 10:30:57 by 767nutter
Landing Light And Speed Question posted Mon Oct 15 2007 17:13:30 by YHMYYZspotter
Crab Angle Vs Crosswind Direction And Speed posted Thu Apr 5 2007 06:24:48 by Speedracer1407
757 And 737NG posted Mon Mar 26 2007 08:37:55 by LASOctoberB6
757 And 767 RB211 Is There Any Difference In Size? posted Mon Jun 19 2006 14:38:00 by Edumotoki
How Similar Are 757 And 767 Cockpits? posted Tue Dec 6 2005 18:17:46 by Mozart
757 And It's Winglets posted Fri Sep 16 2005 23:39:39 by Lastordu
ISA Altitude And Speed Chart Help posted Tue Jan 11 2005 16:26:56 by Delta07

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format