Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airbus Vs Boeing: Landing AOA And Take Off  
User currently offlinecelestar From Singapore, joined Jul 2001, 403 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 5786 times:

Two questions to ask:
Why Airbus plane all exhibit a higher angle of attack while performing landing? If you look at an Airbus A330 or 340 vs Boeing 777 or Boeing 747, Airbus plane has a much more visible "nose up" while landing as oppose to Boeing plane. I have been observing this for a long time.
Is AIRBUS A330 wing more efficient or is it because it is lighter, that makes the take off run on A330 vs B777-200 much shorter to reach take off speed and lift off? Very curious to know the answer please.

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10096 posts, RR: 26
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 5738 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting celestar (Thread starter):
Why Airbus plane all exhibit a higher angle of attack while performing landing? If you look at an Airbus A330 or 340 vs Boeing 777 or Boeing 747, Airbus plane has a much more visible "nose up" while landing as oppose to Boeing plane. I have been observing this for a long time.

I've noticed the same thing for a long time, but it's important to distinguish between AoA and Deck Angle. What we're seeing is Deck Angle - the angle of the fuse relative to horizontal. Whereas AoA is the angle of the wing with respect to the airflow. It's not immediately apparent just from deck angle.

Quoting celestar (Thread starter):
Is AIRBUS A330 wing more efficient or is it because it is lighter, that makes the take off run on A330 vs B777-200 much shorter to reach take off speed and lift off? Very curious to know the answer please.

I don't know the answer, but there are MANY variables here:
1.) The airplanes have different weights (MTOW, empty, payload, fuel, etc.).
2.) The airplanes have different engines.
3.) Depending on which variants, they may have significantly different missions.
4.) The takeoffs you have observed may be going to different destinations = different loads.
5.) Wind conditions may be different.

...and so on.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently onlinercair1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 1327 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5703 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT

Quoting celestar (Thread starter):
Why Airbus plane all exhibit a higher angle of attack while performing landing? If you look at an Airbus A330 or 340 vs Boeing 777 or Boeing 747, Airbus plane has a much more visible "nose up" while landing as oppose to Boeing plane

It's because the Airbus is made in France.....   



rcair1
User currently offlinecelestar From Singapore, joined Jul 2001, 403 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 5657 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 1):

Thanks for correcting my choice of words.
On the second question, the mentioned variables are all taken into account. I regularly flew from Taiwan to HK on CX. Experience from flying in A330 vs B777-200 is obvious in terms of the take off run. Obviously, I am not comparing with B777-300 which is a bigger payload plane.

On the first subject, it is always very graceful to see a Airbus plane landing, minus the A380. All Airbus planes, espeically the A330/340 (the A320 to a lesser extent but still obvious), hold up their nose and gracefully perform their landing in an almost 'stalling' manner!!


User currently offlinesccutler From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 5555 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 5532 times:

As noted above, AoA is not the same thing as deck angle.

All things being equal, you should not hope for too much nose-up to be required when landing, as that would make the pilots' view of the runway environment more restricted, thus affecting safety negatively. A steeper deck angle also makes tail strikes more likely on go-around.

The visually-satisfying "gracefulness" from the outside observer is an irrelevant abstraction to the pilots and to the aircraft's operation as a whole. Look, some time, at the relatively modest deck angle of the L1011, which seemed to do just fine...



...three miles from BRONS, clear for the ILS one five approach...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Airbus Vs Boeing: Landing AOA And Take Off
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Kink On Trailing Edge In Airbus Vs Boeing Wings posted Fri Jul 9 2010 01:04:37 by Starlionblue
Piloting An Airbus Vs Boeing posted Fri Nov 12 2004 21:32:02 by Aa777jr
F100 And Take-off Flaps posted Sat Jan 17 2004 05:20:21 by Ejaymd11
UAL Airbus Vs. Boeing posted Thu Jun 14 2001 06:23:56 by Concorde1518
Minumum Take Off And Landing Length posted Wed May 30 2012 18:04:25 by FlyIndia
Fuel Consumption During Take-off And Landing posted Fri Nov 21 2008 02:36:08 by Panais
Cabin Lighting At Take-off And Landing At Night posted Mon Dec 18 2006 03:04:40 by Goodday
Boeing 737 Minimum Take-off/Landing Requirements posted Fri Nov 3 2006 16:22:57 by NZ8800
Lights Off On Take Off And Landing posted Sat Jan 7 2006 00:27:35 by Newagebird
Take Off Run Vs Altitude. Rule Of Thumb? posted Sat Feb 11 2012 16:41:57 by a380900

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format