Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Engine De-rate  
User currently offlineSRQKEF From Iceland, joined Jun 2011, 886 posts, RR: 1
Posted (2 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4032 times:

Dear All,

Can anyone tell me how much I can expect to extend the expected engine life between shop-visits by using 15% or 20% de-rate as opposed to 10%?

Thanks, Sveinn.


Flights flown: 280 - Airlines: 40 - Airports: 64 - Next flights: KEF-BOS-EWR-PBI-TPA/SFB-KEF
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinewingscrubber From UK - England, joined Sep 2001, 850 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 1 month 1 week 2 days ago) and read 3976 times:

I found some goodies for you, take a look;

Rolls Royce on derating:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...nVc-mQ&sig2=wKko13IYTq1_bnmy1OOoJg

The Operator Benefits Of Climb Derate
As a rule of thumb, if the average time weighted climb derate achieved in operation
is 5%, then Rolls-Royce estimates that this will typically result in 3% more time-onwing
to full refurbishment compared to using maximum climb thrust all the time
(although other factors such as takeoff derate, stage length, harshness of operation,
etc., also have an effect).
Three percent more time on wing to full refurbishment is equivalent to 3% reduction
in Direct Maintenance Cost (DMC) per engine flying hour, so climb derate can offer
some significant savings if used consistently.
As previously shown in section 2, the block fuel increase is very small; in the CLB 1
Slow example in Figure 9 the value was $9 per trip. Assuming 700 trips per year the
cost of the increased fuel is $6,300 per aircraft per year, but the DMC savings due to
5% achieved climb derate could typically be 10 times this per aircraft per year.

Airbus on derating:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...5BARaQ&sig2=WfPrGqtqC_S-3Q5YsQc1BQ

The severity factor for a one hour flight is 1.6 with no derate and 1.2 with 10% derate, which represents a 30% decrease therefore: Shop visit rate improvement = 0.9% x 30% = 0.27... etc etc, this from a 1984 'airbus technical digest'

Some old Mil-reports on life extension, which don't mention derating, but interesting nonetheless:
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/p010771.pdf
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADP014072

And finally, an old thread:
How To De-rate An Engine (by Liamksa Nov 8 2003 in Tech Ops)

Thanks for giving me something fun to research - more interesting than work  



Resident TechOps Troll
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 2, posted (2 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3969 times:

Quoting SRQKEF (Thread starter):
Can anyone tell me how much I can expect to extend the expected engine life between shop-visits by using 15% or 20% de-rate as opposed to 10%?

It depends what's driving your shop visits; if it's happening because you're hitting the limits on the life-limited parts, then it won't save you any time. If it's happening because of EGT degradation then you'll see some benefit (but it will depend a lot on which derates you're using and what the original thrust rating is).

Tom.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Engine De-rate
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772? posted Sun Jun 24 2012 13:24:59 by jayeshrulz
Is It A Good Ideal To De-Rate The 777-X Engines? posted Thu Sep 22 2011 16:48:52 by 747400sp
Engine De-rating And Outside Temperature posted Thu Jul 29 2010 17:33:15 by KrisYYZ
De Havilland Comet 4 Engine Placement posted Mon Sep 25 2006 03:22:19 by NZ8800
Engine Start-up Durring De-icing! posted Mon Mar 6 2006 03:27:13 by CYEGsTankers
Difference Between Anti-icing And De-icing posted Wed Aug 1 2012 04:41:51 by Arzouni
Piston Engine Power Problem posted Sun Jul 29 2012 07:38:17 by mawingho
Quads Landing On Two Or One Engine posted Tue Jul 24 2012 14:41:31 by RussianJet
787 White Engine Cowling posted Sun Jul 1 2012 06:13:27 by CambridgeFlyer1
CFM56 Engine Series posted Mon Jun 11 2012 14:09:23 by smartt1982

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format