Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Range Limit Of A320 From MCO/FLL  
User currently offlineflyBTV From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 24 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 2 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4731 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I'm interested in the range limitations of an A320 flying out of MCO or FLL, particularly it's ability to reach LIM. Essentially, I've been holding out hopes that B6 might open up a route into LIM, but I'm unsure if that's possible with their current equipment. NK flies FLL-LIM on a 319. And doing a quick check of the distance, FLL-LIM is essentially the same as BOS-SFO, a flight B6 currently operates.

However, in an article today, Barger notes that B6 is at it's current geographic range limit, but would not rule out widebodies in the future (but I don't see that happening anytime soon):
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...-more-airport-access-correct-.html

My question is - what makes FLL-LIM different than BOS-SFO, as there is a negligible difference in distance? Does the issue involve the lack of suitable alternate airports, requiring a greater fuel reserve? Is there some other issue I'm not thinking of?

Would this situation change with the introduction of A320neos?

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineChimborazo From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2011, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4579 times:

Range quoted in Wiki for an A319 is 3600nm versus A320 at 3200nm. Both routes are approx 2700 statute. I guess once alternate and reserve fuel is taken into account the 32 doesn't have the legs.
Essentially, I don't think it's any thing to do with the route, rather the lower range of the bigger jet.

Neo: assUming the above is the reason, depends on the extra legs of the 320 Neo.


User currently offlineflyBTV From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 24 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4565 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks for the response.

My confusion is that FLL-LIM is 2283 nm and BOS-SFO is 2350 nm. So they 320 can obviously make the flight, but there's obviously something inherently different about the two routes. I would assume that the issue is, as you mentioned, the requirements for the alternate reserve. Generally, what are the requirements for an alternate airport (assuming it meets the obvious criteria of runway length, etc)? Does the fact this is an international flight make a difference?


User currently onlinemandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6927 posts, RR: 76
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 4426 times:

MCO-LIM via the airways would be just under 2500NM.
You can do this BUT, you'd be pushing it with very little margin... but you'd need the 77 tons or 78 tons MTOW version for the IAE V2500-A5 engines.... and you can't carry cargo... you'd be limited to the pax and bags only.

For the 319, no sweat, even with the squashy 156 seat config... the plane can do it, would the pax?   

Quoting flyBTV (Reply 2):
I would assume that the issue is, as you mentioned, the requirements for the alternate reserve.

That would be my guess too. In the US, heaps of alternates... down there? Well, am not familiar with the area so...



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25786 posts, RR: 50
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 4369 times:

Quoting flyBTV (Thread starter):
My question is - what makes FLL-LIM different than BOS-SFO, as there is a negligible difference in distance? Does the issue involve the lack of suitable alternate airports, requiring a greater fuel reserve? Is there some other issue I'm not thinking of?

Jetstream.

A SFO-BOS flight can easily be hit with the equivalent of another 400-500miles+ due to headwinds.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineflyBTV From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 24 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 2 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4329 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting mandala499 (Reply 3):
MCO-LIM via the airways would be just under 2500NM.

That's a good point, I didn't consider the additional distance needed to fly the airways. FLL-LIM would be shorter and B6 does a few South/Latin America routes out of FLL.

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 4):
Jetstream.

A SFO-BOS flight can easily be hit with the equivalent of another 400-500miles+ due to headwinds.

Sure. But that only underscores my original point. If B6 can fly SFO-BOS against the jetstream with their 320s, why can they not fly FLL-LIM? Unless Barger was speaking very, very generally about geography, he made it pretty clear Colombia is the southernmost point that they can reach with their current fleet. There's obviously something different about FLL-LIM and the only thing I can conclude is it's an alternate issue. I'm just not familiar enough with what the requirements are for alternates, especially since this is an international flight. There are other international airports in the country, and in the vicinity of LIM, but nothing that's anywhere near the scale of LIM.

From what it sounds like, this issue is the aircraft not having enough range to reach a suitable alternate, and I'm just not sure what the requirements for such an alternate would be.


User currently offlineRoseflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9666 posts, RR: 52
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 4282 times:

I wouldn't take that comment so literally. Lima and Caracas are both within reach of FLL on the A320. Because of elevation Quito probably isn't.

I think they were referring to going farther south into Brazil.

Lima has the benefit of being due south of Florida which helps because there are no jetstream winds to contend with. All they need is overwater equipped A320s (no ETOPS required) and Jetblue already has those.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineflyBTV From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 24 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 2 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4227 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 6):

I wouldn't take that comment so literally. Lima and Caracas are both within reach of FLL on the A320. Because of elevation Quito probably isn't.

Thanks. That clears up my confusion - it is possible. I don't see Caracas on the horizon as a B6 destination (though perhaps I'm wrong), but I certainly see a fit with their brand with LIM.


User currently onlinemandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6927 posts, RR: 76
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4161 times:

Quoting flyBTV (Reply 5):
If B6 can fly SFO-BOS against the jetstream with their 320s, why can they not fly FLL-LIM?

Well, they will look for the routing to avoid or minimize the headwinds. At LRC, for 2500NM, a headwind of 50kt would add 300NM to the distance... at 100kt headwind, that goes to 3200NM, and at 150kts, it shoots up to 3700NM... the good news is, change the routing to avoid the worst of the headwind, add another 100NM or so, and your net air distance can go up by less than 200NM if you do it right...   

So, the case with FLL/MCO-LIM is:
1. Route Reserve Fuel. (Trip + Res + Hold +Alternate... domestic, doesn't require the "Res"... this is 10% of Trip I think).
2. Less numbers of near alternates, and less further alternates... the airfield density per area is significantly less outside the USA.
FLL being 150NM nearer makes LIM a heck of a lot more accessible... at the far end of the endurance charts, any distance savings can make a lot of difference.

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 6):
I wouldn't take that comment so literally. Lima and Caracas are both within reach of FLL on the A320. Because of elevation Quito probably isn't.

Why would it not work? Quito is 900NM shorter from FLL/MCO... the TOW required is significantly less, and the only problem is, can it take off within UIO's runway for that TOW...   



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineRoseflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9666 posts, RR: 52
Reply 9, posted (2 years 2 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4156 times:

Quoting mandala499 (Reply 8):
Why would it not work? Quito is 900NM shorter from FLL/MCO... the TOW required is significantly less, and the only problem is, can it take off within UIO's runway for that TOW...   

I doubt the A320 can takeoff with enough payload from Quito's elevation.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently onlinemandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6927 posts, RR: 76
Reply 10, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4071 times:

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 9):
I doubt the A320 can takeoff with enough payload from Quito's elevation.

If the runway is long enough, from 9000ft altitude, TOW is limited to about 70 tons.
But, 3000m runway there, you're limited to below 65 tons or so....
65 tons means you're limited to 150 - 165 seats filled for that route.
Add another 1000 meters of runway length at Quito and you can fly out with 180 seats filled to FLL... *wish wish wish*   

Yeah, we can cross UIO off the list then... (TACA I think does the longest 320 from UIO? But to San Salvador from Quito is a lot shorter too!)



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlinebrains From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 259 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3698 times:

The NK FLL-LIM flight is limited to 130 pax +/- a few. Its limited even more if LIM requires an alternate...just cant carry enough fuel.


Brains
User currently onlinemandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6927 posts, RR: 76
Reply 12, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3645 times:

Quoting brains (Reply 11):
The NK FLL-LIM flight is limited to 130 pax +/- a few.

What MTOW are you using and engine type? 74.5 tons and CFM56-5B?



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineROSWELL41 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 790 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3469 times:

As someone who has flown FLL-LIM in an A319, I can tell you that takeoff performance can be a factor depending on the temperature. Also, distance to alternates can be an issue on that route thus requiring even more fuel. B6 could do it with an A320, but they will have to block a large number of seats on a regular basis. That may make the route unprofitable I would think.

User currently offlinebrains From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 259 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3421 times:

Quoting mandala499 (Reply 8):
Why would it not work? Quito is 900NM shorter from FLL/MCO... the TOW required is significantly less, and the only problem is, can it take off within UIO's runway for that TOW...

With a departure fuel of 39,000lbs on average plus a full a/c (max zero fuel weight of 129,000lbs +/- ) you've exceeded max t/o weight (call it 166,000lbs) it more than likely will be even further restricted by the rwy in FLL as Roswell said. You cant carry full paylod and a full load of gas. The more weight you carry the more fuel you need...its a fine line carrying the max pyld with the fuel required to get you to where you're going.

Max T/O weight is the most limiting of several different weights/limits. Being structurally limited (exceeding manufacturers max TOW) happens very infrequently.

They are A319-132s with V2524-A5s



Brains
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Range Limit Of A320 From MCO/FLL
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Puff Of White Smoke From APU Of A320 Family? posted Mon Oct 14 2002 07:39:37 by SEA nw DC10
Range - Catergory Of Aircraft. posted Thu Jun 14 2012 23:58:35 by HAWK21M
A Puff Of Smoke From The Wing Of A 727? posted Thu Nov 24 2011 01:13:13 by B737-112
Open Panel On Side Of A320 During Taxi? posted Fri Aug 13 2010 06:45:09 by jfktpa119
Maximum Pax Payload Range: A319 Versus A320 posted Sat Dec 5 2009 11:13:55 by Shamrock61
Sources Of Vibrations From An Aircraft posted Fri Mar 27 2009 04:33:35 by N707jt
1" Thick Piece Of Glass From A 707, 747? posted Fri Feb 1 2008 12:45:44 by FlapsAndSlats
Source Of Noise From A Jet Engine? posted Fri Nov 18 2005 20:58:50 by Lehpron
Range Extention For A320/321 posted Mon Apr 26 2004 04:07:44 by Aerohottie
Streams Of Rust From Wing Rivets? posted Wed Dec 5 2001 19:06:36 by Mr Spaceman

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format