Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why The Dip On Runway 8R/26L @ ATL  
User currently offlinermoore7734 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 95 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 11 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 4803 times:

Why the dip on runway 8R/26L @ ATL

Why did they not make it relatively flat the whole length when origionally built ?

[Edited 2012-08-23 19:20:25]

[Edited 2012-08-23 19:29:43]

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGlobalMoose From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 28 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 11 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 4743 times:

I'm assuming your question is why the runway isn't a 0% grade the entire length of the runway-

I'm not an airfield engineer, but the biggest reason, I imagine, is cost. We have the technology to level land as needed but the amount of effort (thus cost) required to make a runway exactly flat when a -0.6% grade works perfectly fine.

As an aside, there are a few issues that a non-level (0%) runway presents to a pilot. To name two:

TOLD - my box (FMC, FMGC, MC, whatever you want to call it) usually (key word) stores the percent grade of every runway in its database to run TOLD calculations. Even a small grade can have an effect on take off and landing distance required.

Runway illusions - when pilots fly into one field with regularity, they become accustomed to a specific sight picture of the runway. When the dimensions of the runway change (length, width, and even an up slope or down slope) the sight picture is slightly different. This can result in the pilot flaring early, too late, or in the case of a sloping runway they could flare at the appropriate height above the runway but due an up slope have a bit of a firm landing or float the landing a bit long as in the case of a down slope. Hopefully the pilot performs the necessary airfield study prior to the descent to prevent this!

That is a bit of a pilot perspective, hopefully there are some civil engineers on the forum!



When it absolutely positively has to be there ... at some point.
User currently onlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16991 posts, RR: 67
Reply 2, posted (1 year 11 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4709 times:

Apart from the cost of absolutely level grade (runways are thick and expensive as it is), there's drainage to thing about. Completely flat surfaces are not great in the rain.


"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7552 posts, RR: 32
Reply 3, posted (1 year 11 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4683 times:

None of the runways at KATL appear to be perfectly flat - 10/28 is the closest to level with a 2 ft elevation change between ends

From looking that the FAA airport diagram - http://155.178.201.160/d-tpp/1208/00026AD.PDF

Rwy 8L/26R - the 8L end is 25 feet higher than the 26R end - the slope is 0.6% down from the 8L end
Rwy 8R/26L - the 8R end is 9 feet higher than 8L and 29 feet higher than the 26L end - the slope from the 8R end is 1.0% down and 0.4% down from the 26L end

Rwy 9L/27R - the 9L end is 42 feet higher than the 27R end - the slope is 0.3% down on 9L from about 1/3 way down the runway and 0.4% up from the 27R end
Rwy 9R/27L - the 9R end is 41 feet higher than the 27L end - the slope is 0.5% down and up from the respective ends

The 9R end is the higherst elevation point 1,026 ft

Now as to why the dip - it is probably related to the underlying terrain. It is EXPENSIVE to fill a large area to bring up the elevation, create new drainage routes. Additionall, the time necessary to settle the fill area might have been an unacceptable delay in completion of the runway.

Remember ATL has been an airport since 1926. It was not a 'fresh build' like DFW, DEN or CDG.

Something I found

Quote:
In March 1962 the longest runway (9/27, now 8R) was 7860 ft; runway 3 was 5505 ft and runway 15 was 7220 ft.

so obviously the airport has gone through several rebuilds while still having to keep runways open for operations.


User currently offlinermoore7734 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 11 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 4576 times:

I see that the delta tech-ops hangers are sitting lower on airfield than rest of terminals. Perhaps part of dip is so a/c can get to the delta hangers but then again perhaps just the taxiway would need that and the runway no dip ? Thanks for replies above.

User currently offlineatlamt From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 240 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (1 year 11 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 4517 times:

It's mostly due to the original slope of the land. There is a downward slope to the east. Also the airport was built over the Flint river which now runs under the field. It's source is just to the north. I'm sure it affected how the land was sloped. The east end of all the runways and taxiways was built up to maintain the slope within the regulations. The ramp and concourses are probably the flattest part of the airport but they too required a lot of fill. At the east end of concourse F's ramp it drops off 50+ feet to the cargo and catering facility below.


Fwd to MCO and Placard
User currently offlinermoore7734 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 11 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 4478 times:

Quoting atlamt (Reply 5):
the airport was built over the Flint river which now runs under the field.

How convenient to have the Flint as a natural run-off for drainage. Seems like the hilly north Georgia terrain is not so disadvantaged after all to have a major airport compared to board flat OKC airport. Makes you wonder how they manage the run-off from their airfield.

I can think of another big advantage is runway 10-28 is elevated to the same level as the terminals. I'm thinking if I-285 were not already lower relative to the midfield area that they would have had to re-route the interstate or bore a tunnel under 10-28 instead. Probably more expensive as well.


User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9767 posts, RR: 27
Reply 7, posted (1 year 11 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 4470 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 2):
Apart from the cost of absolutely level grade (runways are thick and expensive as it is), there's drainage to thing about. Completely flat surfaces are not great in the rain.

Not sure, but I'd tend to doubt they rely on the lengthwise grade of a runway for drainage (after all, there are plenty of nearly flat runways in existence).

That's why they are sloped to the sides and grooved.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinecanoecarrier From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2838 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (1 year 11 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4388 times:

the post system doesn't seem to like me today. I can only get two lines in before it's cut off.

[Edited 2012-08-24 10:53:23]

[Edited 2012-08-24 10:55:02]


The beatings will continue until morale improves
User currently offlineN126DL From United States of America, joined May 2010, 123 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 11 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4273 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Are they making a new taxiway intersection with 26L? I noticed the construction equipment last week during my stopover.


DH8 E145 E175 CR2/7/9 A319/20/21 A332/3 D95 M83/88/90 712 737/8 752/3 763/4 77L
User currently offlinermoore7734 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4056 times:

Quoting N126DL (Reply 9):
Are they making a new taxiway intersection with 26L? I noticed the construction equipment last week during my stopover.

"The $40 million project included the runway extension, extensions of taxiways L and M, and the creation of taxiways LA, LB and LC. These three additional taxiways give departing aircraft triple access to Runway 27R, which increases carriers' and air traffic controllers' flexibility in managing airfield operations and should help reduce departure delays. "

source: http://avstop.com/July_2012/runway_e...ternational_airport_efficiency.htm


User currently offlinejetmatt777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2761 posts, RR: 33
Reply 11, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4030 times:

Quoting rmoore7734 (Reply 6):
How convenient to have the Flint as a natural run-off for drainage. Seems like the hilly north Georgia terrain is not so disadvantaged after all to have a major airport compared to board flat OKC airport. Makes you wonder how they manage the run-off from their airfield.

Board flat? How so? Going off memory here, but one of our runways (17L/35R) is identified in a runway extension plan as requiring regrading midfield because of an elevation change -- if they lengthen the runway, the elevation change midfield would prevent seeing the other end of the runway from either side.

http://155.178.201.160/d-tpp/1208/00301AD.PDF

Look at 17L/35R. There is a 3 foot elevation difference from either side, but a 12 foot elevation change midfield. There is also a 19 foot elevation change on 17R/35L end to end. And a 20 foot elevation change from the thresholds of 35L/R (separated by 1 mile). And a 10 foot 3% grade elevation change from the airfield elevation point to the threshold of 31, a distance of 2,500 feet.

If you have ever spent any amount of time at OKC it is actually not very flat at all. It is nearly impossible to take pictures of airplanes from ground level at OKC, the elevation changes usually cut off half of the fuselage from just about anywhere.



No info
User currently offlinermoore7734 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3915 times:

Quoting jetmatt777 (Reply 11):
Board flat? How so? Going off memory here, but one of our runways (17L/35R) is identified in a runway extension plan as requiring regrading midfield because of an elevation change -- if they lengthen the runway, the elevation change midfield would prevent seeing the other end of the runway from either side.

I was on I-44 parallel to the field & it appeared board flat visually. Did not realize the nearly 20 foot plus change. But then again I was going probably 70 MPH    thru there & glanced quickly at it. Thanks for clarifying. As a side note ended putting over 3000 miles plus on rental car going all over that state from top to bottom & east and west to the state borders doing a RF field survey.


User currently offlinejetmatt777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2761 posts, RR: 33
Reply 13, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3871 times:

Quoting rmoore7734 (Reply 12):
I was on I-44 parallel to the field & it appeared board flat visually. Did not realize the nearly 20 foot plus change. But then again I was going probably 70 MPH    thru there & glanced quickly at it. Thanks for clarifying. As a side note ended putting over 3000 miles plus on rental car going all over that state from top to bottom & east and west to the state borders doing a RF field survey.

Oklahoma appears flat....but really the elevation changes are rolling hills and not the traditional cresting-hill, although we do have cresting-hills as well. (for lack of a better term) You don't realize how "not flat" Oklahoma is until you have an ice storm....and realize every single street is sloped up/down by pretty decent amounts. All perception! 



No info
User currently offlinermoore7734 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3807 times:

Quoting jetmatt777 (Reply 13):
Oklahoma appears flat....but really the elevation changes are rolling hills and not the traditional cresting-hill, although we do have cresting-hills as well. (for lack of a better term) You don't realize how "not flat" Oklahoma is until you have an ice storm....and realize every single street is sloped up/down by pretty decent amounts. All perception! 

I have learned my lesson though... will check FAA airport diagrams before I comment on how flat I think an airport is.   


User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7552 posts, RR: 32
Reply 15, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3748 times:

Quoting rmoore7734 (Reply 14):
check FAA airport diagrams

On another thread about a year ago - someone said it was impossible to have a 100 ft elevation change on a runway - so I posted the LAS diagram - with 146 ft change on 7L/25R.


User currently offlinermoore7734 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 11 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3726 times:

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 15):
On another thread about a year ago - someone said it was impossible to have a 100 ft elevation change on a runway - so I posted the LAS diagram - with 146 ft change on 7L/25R.

I would not have believed it till I checked it out    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...d/d2/McCarran_Airport_Diagram.svg. Thanks

  


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Why The Dip On Runway 8R/26L @ ATL
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why The Bigger Intake On The Same 727? posted Sun Feb 27 2011 10:38:51 by c5load
Why The Sawtooth Edge On 787 Engine? posted Sat Feb 12 2011 11:48:38 by KevinPDX
Why Select MDA On The MCP (or Altitude Preselect)? posted Thu May 27 2010 20:20:29 by bio15
Piper Seminole: Why No Prime On The 3rd Cylinders? posted Thu Apr 8 2010 13:13:45 by Northwest727
Why The Extra Door On This 767 And Not This 767? posted Thu Apr 1 2010 18:39:46 by c5load
Why No Winglets On The 736? posted Tue Sep 1 2009 18:20:16 by Hawaiian763
737-900ER - Why The Horrible Sound On Takeoff? posted Wed Aug 5 2009 18:14:08 by Comorin
CF6-6 Engine On DC-10... Why The Weird Cone? posted Tue Mar 4 2008 08:11:31 by BR715-A1-30
Why No Winglets On The A380 posted Thu Dec 20 2007 12:14:58 by DL767captain
Why The "wheel" On Landing Gear Levers? posted Fri Mar 3 2006 11:52:41 by Slinker

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format