Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is This Legal Or Not Unbelievable Thing To Do?  
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2465 posts, RR: 44
Posted (2 years 3 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 6057 times:

This guy does something really risky and silly i know if you need to do any sort of work on an aircraft you have to jump through hoops but this guy does it like its an RC aircraft
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Du51...g&feature=youtube_gdata_player


On a wing and a prayer
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineflyingturtle From Switzerland, joined Oct 2011, 2550 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (2 years 3 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 6029 times:

Quoting JumboJim747 (Thread starter):
but this guy does it like its an RC aircraft

It's a real 747.


Compare with Great Video of 747 landing gear. (by famfflores Apr 17 2012 in Tech Ops)



David



Keeping calm is terrorism against those who want to live in fear.
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2465 posts, RR: 44
Reply 2, posted (2 years 3 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 6021 times:

Yes i know its real but this guy added the camera himself with cable ties seems weird to me


On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 20342 posts, RR: 59
Reply 3, posted (2 years 3 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 5709 times:

Quoting JumboJim747 (Reply 2):

Yes i know its real but this guy added the camera himself with cable ties seems weird to me

Apparently, he cleared it with his company. There is an alternate landing gear extension/retraction on the 747 that allows the NLG to be left down when the MLG is retracted.

What surprises me is that it didn't damage the camera. The camera would get quite a cold soak at altitude. If it is not waterproof, on descent, the camera (and its circuitry) will remain extremely cold, which could very well lead to condensation forming on the interior circuitry where it is sheltered from the airflow, especially if they pass through a cloud.


User currently offlineRoseflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9817 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (2 years 3 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 5669 times:

You have to get a modification approved by the engineering organization from that airline to ensure it does not impact the certification of the airplane. Adding equipment like a camera does not necessarily need a supplemental type certificate, but it would need some engineering to make it legal to be installed. Using a hand held camera and a zip tie is a bit crude, however if the camera is not using electrical power from the airplane, is not near the fuel system, and if it is outside the pressure vessel there aren't that many regulations.

Airlines do install sensors on airplanes for various reasons. It's not abnormal to have engineering install strain gauges or some other type of measuring equipment on the airplane to measure something. Boeing, Airbus and various suppliers work regularly with airlines to instrument airplanes as a part of their aging aircraft design work, although typically airplanes aren't flying regular revenue service in this configuration. I've seen a 737 with all sorts of strain gauges hooked up to the nose landing gear to measure various parameters to help improve reliability of components.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineTod From Denmark, joined Aug 2004, 1729 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (2 years 3 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 5613 times:

As mentioned above, it just takes some engineering paper for most airlines to do that with the aircraft during a test flight as its in 'experimental' status. Revenue flights are a whole different story. I've been required to go the STC path just to put temp sensors in air ducts and connect them to a little 9 volt data logger if pax are on onboard inflight.

User currently offlinekiffy From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 218 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 3 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4827 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR

Check out the end of this Delta commercial...  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm6iyOq0v-Y#t=46s

User currently offlineAF1624 From France, joined Jul 2006, 665 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 3 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 4462 times:

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 3):
What surprises me is that it didn't damage the camera. The camera would get quite a cold soak at altitude. If it is not waterproof, on descent, the camera (and its circuitry) will remain extremely cold, which could very well lead to condensation forming on the interior circuitry where it is sheltered from the airflow, especially if they pass through a cloud.

It was probably a GoPro.

A nuclear blast wouldn't damage a GoPro. These cameras can resist anything. Seriously. I've dropped mine from a 10 floor building and the casing was barely scratched. Some guys attached these cameras to rockets or atmospheric balloons and flew them thousands of feet in the air, they came back to the ground with no parachute, and the thing was still intact.

One guy lost his camera on a beach, the thing stayed in the water for 6 months before being found by some random guy. Camera intact after a good wash.



Cheers
User currently offlinetravelavnut From Netherlands, joined May 2010, 1667 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (2 years 3 months 21 hours ago) and read 4336 times:

Quoting AF1624 (Reply 7):

It was probably a GoPro

This video was shot with a Contour HD, still very sturdy.

Although I don't know if it would have survived this;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aU-KvtA20v8

"bumped my head on the door frame on exit unclasping the latch on the box. The camera popped out on exit at 12.500 and fell straight down onto the landing area at the DZ and was recovered by a fellow skydiver. It even caught our landings. Not one scratch on the body or lens. Still can't believe that I got it back and that it is totally fine. A buddy the same day who is one of our camera flyers had the same thing happen but with his SLR....not the same result. I'm definitely a gopro fan for life these little guys are bomb proof"



Live From Amsterdam!
User currently offlineAF1624 From France, joined Jul 2006, 665 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 3 months 20 hours ago) and read 4304 times:

Quoting travelavnut (Reply 8):
Although I don't know if it would have survived this;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aU-KvtA20v8


I'm telling you that thing, even without its protective casing which was the case in that video, will survive anything. Seriously, they should build bomb shelters out of GoPros.

I have a Contour+ as well as I do motovlogs (vlogs on a motorbike) and having tested the two I can say two things :

The Contour is not as sturdy as the GoPro, not by a long shot, but it still is VERY sturdy.

The Contour's image quality is ridiculous compared to the GoPro's. But it is still okay.

That's a bit off-topic though, sorry OP.

[Edited 2012-09-21 08:57:55]


Cheers
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Is This Legal Or Not Unbelievable Thing To Do?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
BP Turbo Oil (Use It, Or Not To Use It) posted Thu May 3 2012 20:36:10 by N8911E
Emergency: When To Land Gear Up Or Not posted Mon Feb 21 2011 10:11:36 by Northwest727
To Backtrack Or Not To Backtrack? posted Sat Jan 16 2010 07:49:55 by BeakerLTN
To NAT Or Not To NAT? posted Tue Jul 14 2009 10:46:14 by Meristem
To Soap Or Not To Soap? posted Tue Nov 28 2006 08:04:19 by Turbonytro
Flare Or Not To Flare? posted Mon Oct 30 2006 09:58:37 by GlobalVillage
Too Much Or Too Little To Do? posted Wed Mar 23 2005 03:59:01 by Swisskloten
What's This Airline Pilot Going To Do? - Takeoff? posted Wed Jun 11 2003 22:40:41 by Mr Spaceman
To Squawk Or Not To Squawk? posted Tue May 29 2001 03:18:12 by Tygue
To Close Or Not? posted Sun Mar 18 2001 04:54:19 by Bryan Becker

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format